Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Assembly Bill 4

Automobile insurance coverage limits, permissible policy provisions, and proof of financial responsibility

Topics: Insurance: Agent, Insurance: Motor vehicle

Became law

The governor signed it on Apr 12, 2011. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jan 14, 2011

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Feb 2, 2011

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Apr 5, 2011

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2011 Wisconsin Act 14

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 13, 2011: “Published 4-26-2011”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Proof of financial responsibility Under former law, prior to 2009 Wisconsin Act 28 (the biennial budget act), motor vehicles operated in this state were not required to be covered by policies of bodily injury and property damage liability insurance, but owners and operators of motor vehicles involved in accidents were subject to certain financial responsibility requirements. The biennial budget act retained and modified these financial responsibility requirements following a motor vehicle accident while also requiring insurance coverage for motor vehicles operated in this state.

Under current law, if a motor vehicle accident results in injury, death, or property damage of $1,000 or more, the Department of Transportation (DOT) is required to notify the operator and owner of the vehicle involved in the accident that the person must deposit with DOT security for the accident in an amount specified by DOT, which DOT has determined is sufficient to satisfy any judgment for damages resulting from the accident. Unless an exception applies, if a person fails to timely deposit security after this notice, DOT must suspend the person's operating privilege if the person was the vehicle operator and suspend all vehicle registrations of the person if the person was the vehicle owner. One of the exceptions is that the person provides proof of financial responsibility. In addition, if DOT receives a certified copy of a judgment for damages of $500 or more arising out of a motor vehicle accident, DOT must immediately suspend the operating privilege and all registrations of the person against whom the judgment was rendered unless the person can provide proof of financial responsibility. In both situations, proof of financial responsibility includes coverage under a motor vehicle liability insurance policy with the following minimum limits, exclusive of interest and costs, for any single accident:

Read the full summary

1. Before January 1, 2010, $25,000 for bodily injury to or death of one person, $50,000 for bodily injury to or death of more than one person, and $10,000 for property damage.

2. From January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2016, $50,000 for bodily injury to or death of one person, $100,000 for bodily injury to or death of more than one person, and $15,000 for property damage.

3. After December 31, 2016, the limits specified in item 2., above, adjusted for inflation and published by DOT.

This bill decreases the minimum limits required under a policy that is acceptable proof of financial responsibility to $25,000 for bodily injury to or death of one person, $50,000 for bodily injury to or death of more than one person, and $10,000 for property damage. The bill also eliminates inflation adjustments for these limits and eliminates statutory language that these limits are determined exclusive of interest and costs.

This bill does not eliminate the provisions of the biennial budget act that, as of June 1, 2010, prohibit a person from operating a motor vehicle in this state unless the owner or operator has a motor vehicle liability insurance policy in effect with respect to the motor vehicle. However, the bill affects these provisions by reducing the required coverage from the minimum limits specified in items 1. to 3., above, to $25,000 for bodily injury to or death of one person, $50,000 for bodily injury to or death of more than one person, and $10,000 for property damage.

Uninsured motorist and medical payments coverages Before the biennial budget act, all motor vehicle liability insurance policies were required to include uninsured motorist coverage in limits of at least $25,000 per person and $50,000 per accident and medical payments coverage in the amount of at least $1,000 per person, although an insured could reject medical payments coverage. Uninsured motorist coverage provides coverage for persons who are legally entitled to recover damages for bodily injury from owners or operators of motor vehicles that are not insured. Medical payments coverage pays for medical or chiropractic services provided to persons who are injured while using the insured motor vehicle. Starting on November 1, 2009, as a result of provisions in the biennial budget act, the minimum limits for uninsured motorist coverage that motor vehicle liability insurance policies must include, except for those written by town mutuals, is $100,000 per person and $300,000 per accident and the minimum limits for medical payments coverage that those policies must include is $10,000. This bill changes the required minimum limits back to $25,000 per person and $50,000 per accident for uninsured motorist coverage and back to $1,000 per person for medical payments coverage.

Underinsured motorist coverage Before the biennial budget act, motor vehicle liability insurance policies did not have to include underinsured motorist coverage but insurers were required to provide written notice of the availability of that coverage and, if an insured accepted underinsured motorist coverage after receiving notice of its availability, the policy had to include the coverage in limits of at least $50,000 per person and $100,000 per accident. Underinsured motorist coverage provides coverage for persons who are legally entitled to recover damages for bodily injury from owners or operators of underinsured motor vehicles. "Underinsured motor vehicle" was not defined in the statutes.

The biennial budget act eliminated the requirement to provide notice of the availability of underinsured motorist coverage and required, starting on November 1, 2009, every motor vehicle liability insurance policy, except for those written by town mutuals, to include that coverage in limits of at least $100,000 per person and $300,000 per accident. In addition, current law now defines an underinsured motor vehicle as a motor vehicle that is involved in an accident with an insured and which, at the time of the accident, was covered by a motor vehicle liability insurance policy with liability limits that are less than the amount needed to fully compensate the insured for his or her damages. The bill retains the requirement that underinsured motorist coverage be provided in every motor vehicle liability insurance policy, except for those written by town mutuals, and reduces the minimum required limits to $50,000 per person and $100,000 per accident. Also, the bill modifies the definition of an underinsured motor vehicle to one with liability limits that are lower than the limits of the insured's underinsured motorist coverage. The effect of this change is that, regardless of the extent of the insured's damages, there is no coverage under the insured's underinsured motorist coverage if the other vehicle involved in the accident has liability limits at least as great as the limits of the insured's underinsured motorist coverage.

Umbrella and excess liability insurance policies Current law, as a result of provisions in the biennial budget act, requires an insurer, except for a town mutual, that writes umbrella or excess liability policies that cover motor vehicle liability to make a written offer of both uninsured motorist coverage and underinsured motorist coverage whenever application is made for such an umbrella or excess liability policy. An applicant or insured may reject the coverage, but must do so in writing. If an insurer fails to provide a required written offer of uninsured or underinsured motorist coverage and the umbrella or excess liability policy does not include the coverage, or coverages, for which an offer was not given, a court must, on the request of the insured, reform the policy to include the coverage or coverages with the same limits as the liability coverage limits under the policy. Current law also excludes umbrella and excess liability policies from the statutory requirements related to the types of coverage that must be provided in a policy that covers motor vehicles and the minimum limits required for those types of coverage (coverage and limits requirements).

The bill restores former law by eliminating the requirement that an insurer writing an umbrella or excess liability policy must make a written offer of uninsured motorist coverage and underinsured motorist coverage and the requirement that a court must reform such a policy to include either coverage. However, the bill retains the current law provision that umbrella and excess liability policies are not subject to the coverage and limits requirements. In addition, the bill also excludes commercial liability policies from the coverage and limits requirements and defines those policies as ones that are intended principally to provide primary coverage for an insured's general liability arising out of its business or other commercial activities but that include coverage for the insured's liability arising out of the ownership, maintenance, or use of a motor vehicle as one component of the policy.

Miscellaneous motor vehicle insurance provisions Current law, as a result of provisions in the biennial budget act, defines an uninsured motor vehicle as including not only an unidentified motor vehicle involved in a hit-and-run accident with an insured but also an unidentified motor vehicle that is simply involved in an accident with the insured, provided that an independent third party provides evidence in support of the unidentified motor vehicle's involvement in the accident. The bill replaces that part of the definition of an uninsured motor vehicle with a "phantom motor vehicle," which is defined as one that is involved in an accident with the insured, that does not make contact with the insured or a vehicle the insured is occupying at the time of the accident, and for which neither the owner nor the operator can be ascertained. Additionally, the facts of the accident must be corroborated by competent evidence provided by someone other than the insured or any other person who makes an underinsured motorist claim as a result of the accident, the accident must be reported to the police or other authorities within 72 hours, and the insured or his or her legal representative must, within 30 days, file with the insurer a statement under oath that the insured has a cause of action for damages against a person whose identity cannot be ascertained and that sets forth the facts supporting the statement. The bill also excludes a motor vehicle that is owned by a governmental unit from the definition of an uninsured motor vehicle.

Current law, as a result of provisions in the biennial budget act, makes a number of formerly permissible provisions prohibited in a motor vehicle liability insurance policy. The bill restores former law, making the following provisions permissible in a motor vehicle liability insurance policy:

1. Providing that, regardless of the number of policies, persons, or vehicles involved, the limits for any coverage under the policy may not be added to the limits for similar coverage applying to other motor vehicles to determine an overall limit of coverage available for a person in any one accident.

2. Providing that the maximum amount of uninsured or underinsured motorist coverage available for bodily injury or death suffered by a person not using a motor vehicle in an accident (such as a pedestrian) is the highest single limit of uninsured or underinsured motorist coverage for any vehicle with respect to which the person is insured at the time of the accident.

3. Providing that the maximum amount of medical payments coverage available for bodily injury or death suffered by a person not using a motor vehicle in an accident is the highest single limit of medical payments coverage for any vehicle with respect to which the person is insured at the time of the accident.

4. Providing that the limits under the policy for uninsured or underinsured motorist coverage for bodily injury or death resulting from an accident shall be reduced by amounts paid or payable by or on behalf of a person or organization that is legally responsible for the bodily injury or death; amounts paid or payable under any worker's compensation law; or amounts paid or payable under any disability benefits laws.

Current law provides that an insurer may not place an applicant for motor vehicle insurance in a high-risk category on the basis that the applicant has not previously had motor vehicle insurance. The bill removes this prohibition.

Who's behind it

58 lawmakers are its ⁠. 56 are Republicans, 1 is a Democrat and 1 is a Independent.

13 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 71 names

Authors (58)

Signed on in support (13)

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 9 votes on this bill. Taking a bill up right away needs two-thirds of the members, a higher bar than passing it, so that vote can draw more yeses than the final one.

Assembly Committee on Insurance vote on an amendment

Passed, 8 to 5 · Jan 27, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Insurance, Ayes 8, Noes 5”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 58 to 34 · Feb 2, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 10 laid on table, Ayes 58, Noes 34”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 60 to 32 · Feb 2, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 11 laid on table, Ayes 60, Noes 32”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 57 to 35 · Feb 2, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 12 laid on table, Ayes 57, Noes 35”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 58 to 34 · Feb 2, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 8 laid on table, Ayes 58, Noes 34”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 57 to 35 · Feb 2, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 9 laid on table, Ayes 57, Noes 35”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to take it up right away

Passed, 60 to 32 · Feb 2, 2011 · 4 didn't vote

See how each of the 96 representatives voted

D: Democrat, I: Independent, R: Republican

Yes (60)

Didn't vote (4)

Official motion: “Refused to suspend rules to read a third time, Ayes 60, Noes 32”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 61 to 34 · Mar 8, 2011 · 1 didn't vote

See how each of the 96 representatives voted

D: Democrat, I: Independent, R: Republican

Yes (61)

Didn't vote (1)

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 61, Noes 34”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to take it up right away

Passed, 57 to 38 · Mar 8, 2011 · 1 didn't vote

See how each of the 96 representatives voted

D: Democrat, I: Independent, R: Republican

Yes (57)

No (38)

Didn't vote (1)

Official motion: “Refused to suspend rules to order immediately messaged, Ayes 57, Noes 38”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 13, 2011

    The new law was published.

  2. Apr 12, 2011

    The governor signed it. It became 2011 Wisconsin Act 14.

  3. Apr 12, 2011

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Apr 5, 2011

    The Senate passed it too.

  5. Mar 16, 2011

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.

  6. Mar 10, 2011

    The Senate received it.

  7. Mar 10, 2011

    “Messaged pursuant to Assembly Rule 50 (1)” (the official wording)

  8. Mar 8, 2011

    The Assembly passed it, 61 to 34.

  9. Feb 2, 2011

    “Record and vote on tabling AA12 expunged” (the official wording)

  10. Feb 2, 2011

    The Assembly adopted it.

  11. Jan 27, 2011

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  12. Jan 27, 2011

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 10 to 3.

  13. Jan 19, 2011

    The committee held a public hearing.

  14. Jan 18, 2011

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  15. Jan 14, 2011

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Insurance.

  16. Jan 14, 2011

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jan 14, 2011 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Nygren, Petersen, Steineke, Klenke, Knilans, Krug, Petryk, Rivard, Endsley, Tranel, Marklein, Severson, Wynn, Bernier, Tiffany, Jacque, Weininger, Knudson, T. Larson, Kooyenga, Farrow, Kuglitsch, Litjens, August, Kapenga, Thiesfeldt, Williams, Honadel, Ripp, Nerison, J. Fitzgerald, Kramer, Suder, Vos, Knodl, Ballweg, Mursau, Murtha, Kestell, Meyer, Petrowski, Tauchen, Brooks, A. Ott, J. Ott, Bies, Van Roy, Kaufert, Stone, Kerkman, LeMahieu, Strachota, Kleefisch, Nass, Spanbauer, Pridemore, Ziegelbauer and Fields;Cosponsored by Senators Lasee, Lazich, Taylor, Darling, Hopper, Wanggaard, Galloway, Kapanke, Leibham, Harsdorf, Kedzie and Vinehout

  2. Jan 14, 2011 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Insurance

  3. Jan 18, 2011 · Assembly

    Representative Danou added as a coauthor

  4. Jan 19, 2011 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Jan 25, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Kapenga

  6. Jan 26, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Molepske Jr

  7. Jan 26, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 3 offered by Representative Molepske Jr

  8. Jan 26, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 4 offered by Representative Molepske Jr

  9. Jan 26, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 5 offered by Representative Molepske Jr

  10. Jan 26, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 6 offered by Representative Molepske Jr

  11. Jan 27, 2011 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  12. Jan 27, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 7 offered by committee on Insurance

  13. Jan 27, 2011 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Insurance, Ayes 8, Noes 5

  14. Jan 27, 2011 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 7 adoption recommended by committee on Insurance, Ayes 8, Noes 5

  15. Jan 27, 2011 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Insurance, Ayes 10, Noes 3

  16. Jan 27, 2011 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  17. Jan 31, 2011 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 2-2-2011 by committee on Rules

  18. Feb 2, 2011 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  19. Feb 2, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 adopted

  20. Feb 2, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 7 adopted

  21. Feb 2, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 8 offered by Representatives Molepske Jr and Richards

  22. Feb 2, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 8 laid on table, Ayes 58, Noes 34

  23. Feb 2, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 9 offered by Representatives Molepske Jr and Richards

  24. Feb 2, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 9 laid on table, Ayes 57, Noes 35

  25. Feb 2, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 10 offered by Representatives Molepske Jr and Clark

  26. Feb 2, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 10 laid on table, Ayes 58, Noes 34

  27. Feb 2, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 11 offered by Representatives Young, Kessler, E. Coggs and Zamarripa

  28. Feb 2, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 11 laid on table, Ayes 60, Noes 32

  29. Feb 2, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 12 offered by Representative D. Cullen

  30. Feb 2, 2011 · Assembly

    Record and vote on tabling AA12 expunged

  31. Feb 2, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 12 laid on table, Ayes 57, Noes 35

  32. Feb 2, 2011 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  33. Feb 2, 2011 · Assembly

    Refused to suspend rules to read a third time, Ayes 60, Noes 32

  34. Mar 8, 2011 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 61, Noes 34

  35. Mar 8, 2011 · Assembly

    Refused to suspend rules to order immediately messaged, Ayes 57, Noes 38

  36. Mar 10, 2011 · Assembly

    Messaged pursuant to Assembly Rule 50 (1)

  37. Mar 10, 2011 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  38. Mar 16, 2011 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  39. Mar 16, 2011 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  40. Apr 4, 2011 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 4-5-2011 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  41. Apr 5, 2011 · Senate

    Read a second time

  42. Apr 5, 2011 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  43. Apr 5, 2011 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  44. Apr 5, 2011 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in

  45. Apr 5, 2011 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  46. Apr 5, 2011 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  47. Apr 6, 2011 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled

  48. Apr 12, 2011 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 4-11-2011

  49. Apr 12, 2011 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-12-2011. 2011 Wisconsin Act 14

  50. Apr 13, 2011 · Assembly

    Published 4-26-2011

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote