Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Assembly Bill 417

Procedures for establishing a claim (suggested as remedial legislation by the Office of the State Treasurer)

Topics: Circuit court, Statutes: Revision, Treasurer: State

Passed the Assembly, then stopped

The Assembly passed it on Mar 6, 2012, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to ⁠. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Dec 7, 2011

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Mar 6, 2012

  4. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, a person may claim an interest in abandoned, intangible property by filing a claim with the state treasurer. Intangible property is presumed to be abandoned if it is held, issued, or owing in the ordinary course of a holder's business and it has remained unclaimed by the owner for more than five years after it became payable or distributable. Current law requires the state treasurer to consider each claim within 90 days after the claim is filed. The state treasurer may also refer a claim to the attorney general for an opinion on whether to either allow the claim or deny the claim in whole or in part.

A person aggrieved by a decision of the state treasurer or whose claim has not been acted upon within 90 days (claimant) may, under current law, bring an action to establish the claim in circuit court. If, in circuit court, the claimant establishes the claim against the state treasurer, the court must award costs and reasonable attorney fees to the claimant.

Read the full summary

This bill permits a claimant to petition for judicial review of the decision or inaction of the state treasurer under chapter 227 of the statutes; chapter 227 establishes uniform procedures for the review of administrative actions and decisions. The bill also eliminates the mandatory award of costs and reasonable attorneys fees to a claimant who prevails against the state treasurer in circuit court in those cases in which the circuit court determines the state treasurer was substantially justified in taking its position or in which special circumstances exist that would make the award of costs and attorney fees unjust.

This bill is explained in the Notes provided by the Joint Legislative Council in the bill.

Who's behind it

Bill Kramer, a Republican, is its ⁠.

1 more lawmaker ⁠.

See all 2 names

Author (1)

Signed on in support (1)

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Judiciary and Ethics vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 2 · Mar 2, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Judiciary and Ethics, Ayes 5, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2012

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Mar 7, 2012

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations.

  3. Mar 7, 2012

    The Senate received it.

  4. Mar 6, 2012

    The Assembly passed it.

  5. Mar 2, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. Mar 2, 2012

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 2.

  7. Feb 2, 2012

    The committee held a public hearing.

  8. Dec 7, 2011

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Judiciary and Ethics.

  9. Dec 7, 2011

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Dec 7, 2011 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representative Kramer;Cosponsored by Senator Grothman

  2. Dec 7, 2011 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary and Ethics

  3. Feb 2, 2012 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Mar 1, 2012 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  5. Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Judiciary and Ethics, Ayes 5, Noes 2

  6. Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  7. Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 3-6-2012 by committee on Rules

  8. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  9. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  10. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  11. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  12. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  13. Mar 7, 2012 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  14. Mar 7, 2012 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations

  15. Mar 23, 2012 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote