Skip to content

Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session

AB 417

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

procedures for establishing a claim (suggested as remedial legislation by the Office of the State Treasurer).

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, a person may claim an interest in abandoned, intangible

property by filing a claim with the state treasurer. Intangible property is presumed

to be abandoned if it is held, issued, or owing in the ordinary course of a holder's

business and it has remained unclaimed by the owner for more than five years after

it became payable or distributable. Current law requires the state treasurer to

consider each claim within 90 days after the claim is filed. The state treasurer may

also refer a claim to the attorney general for an opinion on whether to either allow

the claim or deny the claim in whole or in part.

A person aggrieved by a decision of the state treasurer or whose claim has not

been acted upon within 90 days (claimant) may, under current law, bring an action

to establish the claim in circuit court. If, in circuit court, the claimant establishes

the claim against the state treasurer, the court must award costs and reasonable

attorney fees to the claimant.

This bill permits a claimant to petition for judicial review of the decision or

inaction of the state treasurer under chapter 227 of the statutes; chapter 227

establishes uniform procedures for the review of administrative actions and

decisions. The bill also eliminates the mandatory award of costs and reasonable

attorneys fees to a claimant who prevails against the state treasurer in circuit court

in those cases in which the circuit court determines the state treasurer was

substantially justified in taking its position or in which special circumstances exist

that would make the award of costs and attorney fees unjust.

This bill is explained in the

Notes

provided by the Joint Legislative Council in

the bill.

Sponsors

Introduced by: Kramer (R)

1 cosponsors

Grothman (R)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Judiciary and Ethics, Ayes 5, Noes 2

Passed 5–2 Mar 2, 2012 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Dec 7, 2011 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representative Kramer;Cosponsored by Senator Grothman

  2. Dec 7, 2011 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary and Ethics

  3. Feb 2, 2012 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Mar 1, 2012 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  5. Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Judiciary and Ethics, Ayes 5, Noes 2

  6. Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  7. Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 3-6-2012 by committee on Rules

  8. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  9. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  10. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  11. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  12. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  13. Mar 7, 2012 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  14. Mar 7, 2012 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations

  15. Mar 23, 2012 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1