Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
procedures for establishing a claim (suggested as remedial legislation by the Office of the State Treasurer).
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, a person may claim an interest in abandoned, intangible
property by filing a claim with the state treasurer. Intangible property is presumed
to be abandoned if it is held, issued, or owing in the ordinary course of a holder's
business and it has remained unclaimed by the owner for more than five years after
it became payable or distributable. Current law requires the state treasurer to
consider each claim within 90 days after the claim is filed. The state treasurer may
also refer a claim to the attorney general for an opinion on whether to either allow
the claim or deny the claim in whole or in part.
A person aggrieved by a decision of the state treasurer or whose claim has not
been acted upon within 90 days (claimant) may, under current law, bring an action
to establish the claim in circuit court. If, in circuit court, the claimant establishes
the claim against the state treasurer, the court must award costs and reasonable
attorney fees to the claimant.
This bill permits a claimant to petition for judicial review of the decision or
inaction of the state treasurer under chapter 227 of the statutes; chapter 227
establishes uniform procedures for the review of administrative actions and
decisions. The bill also eliminates the mandatory award of costs and reasonable
attorneys fees to a claimant who prevails against the state treasurer in circuit court
in those cases in which the circuit court determines the state treasurer was
substantially justified in taking its position or in which special circumstances exist
that would make the award of costs and attorney fees unjust.
This bill is explained in the
Notes
provided by the Joint Legislative Council in
the bill.
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Judiciary and Ethics, Ayes 5, Noes 2
Passed 5–2 Mar 2, 2012 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Dec 7, 2011 · Assembly
Introduced by Representative Kramer;Cosponsored by Senator Grothman
- Dec 7, 2011 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary and Ethics
- Feb 2, 2012 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Mar 1, 2012 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by committee on Judiciary and Ethics, Ayes 5, Noes 2
- Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 3-6-2012 by committee on Rules
- Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed
- Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Mar 7, 2012 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Mar 7, 2012 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations
- Mar 23, 2012 · Senate
Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1