Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Assembly Bill 427

The purposes, authority, and responsibilities of the Educational Approval Board and the regulation of schools by that board

Topics: Educational Approval Board, Technical college, Trades and occupations

Passed the Assembly, then stopped

The Assembly passed it on Feb 21, 2012, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to ⁠. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Dec 14, 2011

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 94 to 0

  4. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Education Other educational and cultural agencies Under current law, the Educational Approval Board (EAB) is required to protect the general public by inspecting and approving private trade, correspondence, business, and technical schools, changes of ownership or control of those schools, teaching locations used by those schools, and courses of instruction offered by those schools and to regulate the soliciting of students for courses and courses of instruction offered by those schools. Current law also requires EAB to perform certain actions to protect students, prevent fraud, and encourage generally accepted educational standards at those schools. Those actions include requiring schools offering courses and courses of instruction to residents of this state to furnish information concerning their facilities, curricula, instructors, enrollment policies, tuition and other charges and fees, refund policies, and policies concerning the negotiability of promissory instruments received in payment of tuition and other charges.

Current law also prohibits a solicitor representing any school from soliciting students for a course or course of instruction for a consideration or remuneration, except upon the actual business premises of the school, unless the solicitor first secures a solicitor's permit from EAB, and includes provisions relating to application for and issuance of solicitor's permits, refusal or revocation of those permits, and consequences for soliciting students without a permit. Moreover, current law permits EAB to indemnify a student, parent, or sponsor from an appropriation commonly referred to as the student protection fund if a school closure results in losses to the student, parent, or sponsor. Finally, current law permits EAB to take possession of the student records of schools, including certain schools not approved by EAB, that have discontinued their operations, are proposing to discontinue their operations, or are in imminent danger of discontinuing their operations, if the records are in danger of being destroyed, secreted, mislaid, or otherwise being made unavailable to the person who is the subject of the record. Schools not approved by EAB whose student records EAB may take into possession include tax-exempt schools that were incorporated in this state before January 1, 1992, or that had their headquarters and principal places of business in this state before 1970; schools that are licensed, approved, and supervised by other state agencies; schools approved by the Department of Public Instruction for the training of teachers; and schools accredited by accrediting agencies recognized by EAB.

Read the full summary

This bill moves the powers and duties of EAB from a chapter of the statutes relating to the Technical College System to its own newly created chapter, reorganizes those powers and duties, and makes various substantive changes with respect to those powers and duties. Specifically, the bill does the following:

1.

Purposes.

Specifies that the purposes of EAB are to protect the general public and to support quality educational options and requires EAB to accomplish those purposes by doing all of the following:

a. Evaluating and approving schools, which the bill redefines to mean, subject to certain exceptions, any individual, partnership, association, corporation, or limited liability company doing business within this state, whether located within or outside this state, that offers, maintains, provides, or conducts for a fee a course of study that provides practical or academic instruction, education, or training leading to a diploma, certificate, degree, or other indicia that a student has acquired knowledge or skills (program), including any private trade, technical, career, distance learning, or degree-granting school.

b. Collecting and disseminating outcome and satisfaction information for the students of schools.

c. Performing annual reviews of schools.

d. Conducting regular on-site evaluations of schools.

e. Holding schools accountable for improving their performance and effectiveness.

f. Supporting options for innovative and quality programs offered by schools.

2.

Accountability.

Requires EAB to develop, periodically review, and, if appropriate, revise a strategic plan and to use the strategic plan to evaluate annually EAB's performance and effectiveness.

3.

Authority.

Requires EAB to approve schools, programs that another state agency or board is not authorized to approve or accept, changes of ownership or control of schools, teaching locations used by schools, and school representatives who, in places other than a school, attempt to secure the enrollment of students in the school if those schools, programs, changes of ownership or control, meet the requirements and standards established by EAB and that comply with rules promulgated by EAB. In the case of a school that offers a program that another state agency or board is authorized to approve or accept, including a program leading to a credential that is required for licensure or a program providing professional development for a licensee, the bill requires EAB to cooperate with that other state agency or board in the approval of the school by EAB and the approval or acceptance of the program by that other state agency or board. The bill also grants to the state superintendent of public instruction the exclusive authority to approve or accept programs offered in this state leading to the licensure of teachers and schools that, in this state, offer only those programs.

4.

Responsibility.

Requires EAB to perform certain actions to hold schools accountable for achieving satisfactory student outcomes and to ensure that programs meet generally accepted educational, occupational, and industry standards, including establishing standards and criteria for approving schools offering programs that are delivered primarily by distance learning and requiring a school, prior to enrolling a student who is a resident of this state, to provide the student with a catalog that includes information about the following:

a. The school's mission, facilities, programs, and instructors.

b. The school's policies concerning enrollment and admissions, academic progress, and student conduct.

c. Student services, including employment assistance services, that the school provides.

d. The school's complaint procedures.

e. Student outcome and satisfaction information.

f. The school's fees, refund policies, and policies concerning the negotiability of promissory instruments received in payment of fees.

g. Any other information EAB considers necessary to hold schools accountable for achieving satisfactory student outcomes and to ensure that programs meet generally accepted educational, occupational, and industry standards.

5.

Reporting.

Requires an approved school to submit annually to EAB all of the following:

a. Information about the school as prescribed by EAB, including a current school catalog, an enrollment contract, if one is used, copies of advertising used by the school, and financial information as EAB considers necessary.

b. Student satisfaction and outcome information, including information on the number of students from the prior year who are continuing in the current year, the number of new students starting in the current year, the number of students who have dropped out or withdrawn since the prior year, the number of students who are anticipated to continue next year, the number of students completing a program, the number of completers successfully employed, and such other information as EAB considers necessary.

c. A report on the school's progress in achieving the goals of its institutional plan.

6.

Recruiting.

Deletes, effective 24 months after the date of publication of the bill, the statutory provisions relating to solicitor's permits, but retains EAB's responsibility to regulate student recruitment and to issue permits to school representatives.

7.

Student protection fund.

Permits EAB to pursue any legal action it considers necessary to recover any losses paid from the student protection fund.

Who's behind it

2 lawmakers are its ⁠. 1 is a Republican. 1 has no party on record.

1 more lawmaker ⁠.

See all 3 names

Authors (2)

  • Steve Nass · Republican, Senate
  • by request of The Educational Approval Board (EAB)

Signed on in support (1)

How lawmakers voted

There were 3 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Colleges and Universities vote to recommend it

Passed, 11 to 0 · Jan 19, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Colleges and Universities, Ayes 11, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 94 to 0 · Feb 21, 2012 · 5 didn't vote

See how each of the 99 representatives voted

D: Democrat, I: Independent, R: Republican

Yes (94)

Didn't vote (5)

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 94, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Education vote to recommend it

Passed, 6 to 0 · Mar 8, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 6, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2012

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Mar 8, 2012

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 6 to 0.

  3. Feb 28, 2012

    The committee held a public hearing.

  4. Feb 22, 2012

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Education.

  5. Feb 22, 2012

    The Senate received it.

  6. Feb 21, 2012

    The Assembly passed it, 94 to 0.

  7. Jan 19, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  8. Jan 19, 2012

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 11 to 0.

  9. Jan 5, 2012

    The committee held a public hearing.

  10. Dec 14, 2011

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Colleges and Universities.

  11. Dec 14, 2011

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Dec 14, 2011 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representative Nass, by request of The Educational Approval Board (EAB);Cosponsored by Senator Schultz

  2. Dec 14, 2011 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Colleges and Universities

  3. Jan 5, 2012 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Jan 12, 2012 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  5. Jan 19, 2012 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Colleges and Universities, Ayes 11, Noes 0

  6. Jan 19, 2012 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  7. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 2-21-2012 by committee on Rules

  8. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  9. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  10. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  11. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 94, Noes 0

  12. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  13. Feb 22, 2012 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  14. Feb 22, 2012 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Education

  15. Feb 28, 2012 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  16. Mar 7, 2012 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  17. Mar 8, 2012 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 6, Noes 0

  18. Mar 8, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  19. Mar 23, 2012 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote