Skip to content

Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session

AB 433

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

requiring an ignition interlock device for first drunken driving offenses.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, a court is required to order a person's motor vehicle

operating privilege be restricted to operating vehicles that are equipped with an

ignition interlock device if a person commits a second or subsequent offense related

to operating a vehicle while intoxicated or a first offense while his or her alcohol

concentration is 0.15 or greater, refuses to take a test for intoxication, or injures or

kills a person while operating a vehicle while intoxicated. Under current law, the

operating privilege restriction stays in place for not less than one year nor more than

the maximum operating privilege revocation period permitted for the refusal or

violation.

This bill requires a court to order the operating privileges of a person who

commits a first offense related to operating a vehicle while intoxicated, regardless

of his or her alcohol concentration, be restricted to operating vehicles that are

equipped with an ignition interlock device. The draft does not change the minimum

or maximum periods for the restriction.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: C. Taylor (D) , Clark (D) , Hulsey (D) , Molepske Jr (D) , Pasch (D) , Richards (D) , Spanbauer (R) , Staskunas (D) , Zepnick (D)

4 cosponsors

C. Larson (D) , Carpenter (D) , S. Coggs (D) , Schultz (R)

Votes

Suspending the rules (to take a vote immediately) needs a two-thirds majority — a higher bar than passing the bill, which needs a simple majority. That's why a suspension motion can show more Ayes than the passage vote that follows it. Glossary

Assembly: Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Homeland Security and State Affairs and take up, Ayes 38, Noes 59

Failed 38–59 Mar 13, 2012 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Dec 16, 2011 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Staskunas, Pasch, C. Taylor, Spanbauer, Clark, Richards, Zepnick, Hulsey and Molepske Jr;Cosponsored by Senators C. Larson, Carpenter, S. Coggs and Schultz

  2. Dec 16, 2011 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Homeland Security and State Affairs

  3. Dec 30, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Jan 4, 2012 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Jan 23, 2012 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Homeland Security and State Affairs and take up, Ayes 38, Noes 59

  7. Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1