Assembly Bill 439
Intoxicated operation of all-terrain vehicles, snowmobiles, motorboats, and motor vehicles, snowmobile safety instruction for persons under 16 years of age, and providing penalties
Topics: Boat, Drunken driving, Legislature: Criminal Penalties, Joint Review Committee on, Natural Resources, Department of: Recreation and boating, Recreation vehicle, Snowmobile
Stopped in committee
It had a but no committee vote, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.
-
Introduced, passed
Dec 20, 2011
-
Committee, stopped here
Stopped here. It had a hearing but no committee vote.
-
Assembly vote, not reached
-
Senate vote, not reached
-
Governor, not reached
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Failed to pass pursuant to ”
It sat with the Assembly Committee on Transportation.
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Under current law, a person may not operate a snowmobile, an all-terrain vehicle (ATV), or a motorboat while under the influence of alcohol or a controlled substance to a degree that he or she cannot operate the vehicle or boat safely. Under current law, a personal watercraft is included in the definition of "motorboat."
Current law also prohibits the operation of an ATV, a recreational motorboat, or a snowmobile by a person who has an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more. For motorboats being operated on a commercial basis, the maximum alcohol concentration is 0.04. These laws are respectively referred to under current law as the intoxicated operation of an ATV law, the intoxicated boating law, and the intoxicated snowmobiling law. Under current law, a person who refuses to submit to a legal request for a breath, blood, or urine sample pursuant to an arrest for operating a snowmobile, an ATV, or a recreational motorboat while under the influence is in violation of what is known as the refusal law.
Read the full summary Show less
Under current law, in imposing a penalty for a violation of the intoxicated operation of an ATV, the intoxicated boating, or the intoxicated snowmobiling law, a court may only count as a previous conviction of the same law, or the applicable refusal law. For example, if a person is before the court for violating the intoxicated snowmobiling law or the snowmobile refusal law, the court may count only previous convictions of the intoxicated snowmobiling law and the snowmobile refusal law as prior convictions. Previous convictions of the intoxicated operation of an ATV law or of the intoxicated boating law or of the applicable refusal laws may not be counted.
Under this bill, a court must count previous convictions of any of these intoxicated operation or refusal laws that occurred within the previous five years when imposing a penalty for a violation of any of these laws.
The bill makes the provisions of the intoxicated operation of an ATV, the intoxicated boating, and the intoxicated snowmobiling laws more consistent. These changes include:
1. Raising the age of absolute sobriety for the operation of snowmobiles and ATVs to 21. Current law requires absolute sobriety for persons under the age of 19 who are operating snowmobiles and ATVs and for persons under the age of 21 for motorboats.
2. Adopting the higher penalties for various violations where the penalties for violations of the intoxicated operation of an ATV law, the intoxicated boating law, the intoxicated snowmobiling law, and the refusal law conflict.
3. Imposing increased penalties for violating the intoxicating boating law or the intoxicated snowmobiling law or related refusal law if the motorboat or snowmobile is operated with a passenger under 16 years of age. The increased penalty already exists for a violation of the intoxicated operation of an ATV law and the ATV refusal law.
4. Repealing the provisions that imposed increased penalties for operating an ATV with an alcohol concentration level that is 0.17 or more. Under current law, these increased penalties are not imposed for violations of the intoxicated boating or the intoxicated snowmobiling laws.
The bill provides that when counting the number of convictions within the previous five years, the previous convictions for intoxicated operation of that same type of recreational vehicle or the related refusal law that occurred before the effective date of this bill are counted, but previous convictions for the other two types of recreational vehicles that occurred before the effective date of this bill are not counted.
The bill also requires a court to enter an order to suspend the person's privilege to operate a snowmobile, an ATV, and a motorboat for a period of not less than 12 months and not more that 16 months if the court imposes a penalty for a violation of the intoxicated operation of an ATV, the intoxicated boating, or the intoxicated snowmobiling law or the related refusal law. The bill also provides a forfeiture and additional six-month period of operating privilege suspension for violating the order of suspension.
If the person is found guilty of a violation of the intoxicated operation of an ATV, the intoxicated boating, or the intoxicated snowmobiling law or the related refusal law and has, within the previous five years, violated one of these laws, the bill requires the court to revoke the person's privilege to operate a motor vehicle for not less than six months and not more than 12 months. Under the bill, the person may be eligible for an occupational driver's license at any time during the revocation period. The bill requires the person whose operating privilege was revoked to pay a $140 reinstatement fee.
Under the bill, if a person has had his or her privilege to operate a motor vehicle suspended or revoked for a violation of a prohibition against operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, the person may not operate a snowmobile, an ATV, or a motorboat during the period of that motor vehicle operating privilege suspension or revocation. The bill also provides a forfeiture and an additional six-month period of operating privilege suspension for violating the order of suspension.
Under current law the sentences of persons who are convicted of certain second, third, or fourth offenses involving the operation of a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant may be reduced if the violator successfully completes a period of probation that includes alcohol and other drug treatment. A person may complete a treatment program and receive a reduced period of imprisonment only once. This bill allows this option to be used for persons convicted of a violation of the intoxicated operation of an ATV, the intoxicated boating, the intoxicated snowmobiling law, or the applicable refusal law.
Under current law, with limited exceptions, no person may operate a snowmobile without having completed a snowmobile safety course. For persons under the age of 16, the course must include six hours of classroom instruction. This bill repeals this classroom instruction requirement.
Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime, the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a report concerning the proposed penalty and the costs or savings that are likely to result if the bill is enacted.
Who's behind it
9 lawmakers are its . 5 are Republicans and 4 are Democrats.
1 more lawmaker .
See all 10 names Hide the names
Authors (9)
- Alvin Ott · Republican, Assembly
- Terese Berceau · Democrat, Assembly
- Garey Bies · Republican, Assembly
- Brett Hulsey · Democrat, Assembly
- André Jacque · Republican, Senate
- Louis Molepske Jr. · Democrat, Assembly
- Warren Petryk · Republican, Assembly
- Tony Staskunas · Democrat, Assembly
- Jeremy Thiesfeldt · Republican, Assembly
Signed on in support (1)
- Luther S. Olsen · Republican, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
What happened
-
Mar 23, 2012
The session ended, and the bill died with it.
-
Jan 31, 2012
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Jan 26, 2012
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Jan 10, 2012
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Jan 4, 2012
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Dec 20, 2011
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Transportation.
-
Dec 20, 2011
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Dec 20, 2011 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Bies, Molepske Jr, Berceau, Hulsey, Jacque, A. Ott, Petryk, Staskunas and Thiesfeldt;Cosponsored by Senator Olsen
- Dec 20, 2011 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation
- Jan 4, 2012 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 10, 2012 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 26, 2012 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 31, 2012 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Feb 2, 2012 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Molepske Jr
- Feb 29, 2012 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Molepske Jr
- Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate