Skip to content

Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session

AB 449

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

increased penalty for repeated domestic abuse offenses and providing a penalty.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, if a person is arrested for a domestic abuse crime and

commits a second domestic abuse crime (against the same victim or a different

victim) within 72 hours after being arrested for the first crime, the person's

maximum term of imprisonment for the second crime may be increased by up to two

years. Additionally, the penalty increase changes the status of the second crime from

a misdemeanor to a felony.

Current law generally requires a court to impose a domestic abuse surcharge

on a person who commits certain criminal acts against his or her spouse or former

spouse, against an adult with whom the adult person resides or formerly resided, or

against an adult with whom the adult person has created a child. This surcharge is

in addition to any other fines or terms of imprisonment.

Under this bill, the same increase in the term of imprisonment and the same

change from a misdemeanor to a felony also applies to a person who was convicted,

on two separate occasions, of a felony or a misdemeanor for which a court imposed

a domestic abuse surcharge during the ten-year period immediately prior to the

commission of the crime for which the person presently is being sentenced. Under the

bill, any time the person spent in jail or in prison does not count in computing the

preceding ten-year period.

Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime,

the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a

report concerning the proposed penalty and the costs or savings that are likely to

result if the bill is enacted.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: A. Ott (R) , Ballweg (R) , Bies (R) , Billings (D) , Brooks (R) , Doyle (D) , Endsley (R) , Jacque (R) , Kaufert (R) , Marklein (R) , Petrowski (R) , Petryk (R) , Ringhand (D) , Ripp (R) , Sinicki (D) , Spanbauer (R) , Staskunas (D) , Steineke (R) , Wynn (R)

7 cosponsors

Erpenbach (D) , Lassa (D) , Olsen (R) , S. Coggs (D) , Schultz (R) , Shilling (D) , Wanggaard (R)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Criminal Justice and Corrections, Ayes 6, Noes 1

Passed 6–1 Feb 14, 2012 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Dec 29, 2011 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives A. Ott, Bies, Billings, Brooks, Doyle, Endsley, Jacque, Marklein, Petrowski, Petryk, Ringhand, Ripp, Sinicki, Spanbauer, Staskunas, Steineke, Wynn, Ballweg and Kaufert;Cosponsored by Senators Olsen, S. Coggs, Erpenbach, Lassa, Schultz, Shilling and Wanggaard

  2. Dec 29, 2011 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Criminal Justice and Corrections

  3. Jan 5, 2012 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Jan 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Jan 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Jan 25, 2012 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  7. Jan 26, 2012 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  8. Feb 9, 2012 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  9. Feb 14, 2012 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Criminal Justice and Corrections, Ayes 6, Noes 1

  10. Feb 14, 2012 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  11. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 2-21-2012 by committee on Rules

  12. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  13. Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1