Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Assembly Bill 450

Participation in certain training by unemployment insurance claimants, granting rule-making authority, and making an appropriation

Topics: Reports, Unemployment insurance, Workforce Development, Department of

Became law

The governor signed it on Mar 13, 2012. It's ⁠. Before signing, the governor struck some parts using Wisconsin's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Dec 29, 2011

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Feb 16, 2012

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed 33 to 0

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2011 Wisconsin Act 123

Latest entry in the official record, May 23, 2012: “Partial veto failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(b)”

How the partial veto works

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Currently, unemployment insurance (UI) benefits may not be denied to an otherwise eligible individual because the individual is enrolled in a vocational training course or a basic education course that is a prerequisite to such training ("approved training") under certain conditions. Current law also permits a claimant who has exhausted all rights to benefits and is enrolled in an approved training course that meets certain qualifications to potentially qualify to receive up to 26 weeks of additional benefits while enrolled in that training ("extended training"). A claimant who is enrolled in approved or extended training is not subject to certain benefit denials or reductions that would otherwise preclude the claimant from claiming benefits while enrolled in approved or extended training.

This bill creates a pilot program of special occupational training that is not approved training. The bill directs the Department of Workforce Development (DWD) to designate three areas served by local workforce development boards in which the program shall be offered. Under the bill, DWD must offer the program throughout each designated area. Under the bill, the training consists of voluntary six-week placements of UI claimants for 20 to 24 hours per week with employers who elect to offer the training directly. A trainee may not be an employee of the employer offering the training. The bill directs DWD to accept applications from employers who wish to offer the training and to place claimants who wish to participate in available openings. On the application, an employer must affirm that it currently has one job opening for each training participant that it seeks in a position that a successful participant would potentially qualify to fill. Under the bill, no claimant may receive more than two placements during a benefit year (period during which benefits are payable). In addition, no claimant may receive a placement for any week beginning after the end of the first 26 weeks of the claimant's benefit year. The bill provides that a claimant who receives special occupational training is not disqualified from receiving UI benefits solely as a result of participating in the training. The bill requires each claimant to maintain eligibility for UI benefits while participating in the training. Under the bill, a claimant who participates in special occupational training receives a stipend of $75 from DWD for each week in which the claimant participates in the training. The bill appropriates general purpose revenue to make the payments. The bill also provides that a claimant who is participating in special occupational training is considered an employee of the state for purposes of worker's compensation benefits and prohibits such a claimant from making a claim or brining on action in tort against the employer that provided the special occupational training. The program created by the bill does not apply after June 30, 2015.

Read the full summary

The bill directs DWD to report to the legislature no later than December 31, 2014, concerning the effectiveness of the program and DWD's recommendations for extension of the program or changes to the program to enhance its effectiveness.

Who's behind it

26 lawmakers are its ⁠. 22 are Republicans and 4 are Democrats.

8 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 34 names

Authors (26)

Signed on in support (8)

  • Alberta Darling · Republican, Senate
  • Pam Galloway · Republican, Senate
  • Jim Holperin · Democrat, Senate
  • Julie M. Lassa · Democrat, Senate
  • Loudenbeck, Barca, Tranel, Seidel, Kestell, J. Ott, Pridemore, Van Roy, Thiesfeldt, T. Larson, Williams, Danou, Billings, C. Taylor, E. Coggs, Hulsey, Pope-Roberts, Ringhand, Bewley, Pasch, Bernard Schaber, Clark, Milroy and Fields
  • Terry Moulton · Republican, Senate
  • Dale Schultz · Republican, Senate
  • Van Wanggaard · Republican, Senate

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 5 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Labor and Workforce Development vote on an amendment

Passed, 8 to 0 · Feb 13, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Labor and Workforce Development, Ayes 8, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 58 to 37 · Feb 16, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 2 laid on table, Ayes 58, Noes 37”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 95 to 0 · Feb 16, 2012 · 4 didn't vote

See how each of the 99 representatives voted

D: Democrat, I: Independent, R: Republican

Yes (95)

Didn't vote (4)

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 95, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 3 to 2 · Feb 20, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 33 to 0 · Feb 21, 2012

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 33, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 23, 2012

    The Assembly voted to override the veto.

  2. May 22, 2012

    “Partial veto placed on calendar 5-22-2012 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)” (the official wording)

  3. Mar 14, 2012

    The new law was published.

  4. Mar 13, 2012

    The governor signed it after striking some parts with a partial veto. It became 2011 Wisconsin Act 123.

  5. Mar 9, 2012

    Sent to the governor.

  6. Feb 21, 2012

    The Senate passed it too, 33 to 0.

  7. Feb 21, 2012

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  8. Feb 20, 2012

    “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2” (the official wording)

  9. Feb 17, 2012

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.

  10. Feb 17, 2012

    The Senate received it.

  11. Feb 16, 2012

    24 more representatives signed on in support.

  12. Feb 16, 2012

    The Assembly passed it, 95 to 0.

  13. Feb 16, 2012

    “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and taken up” (the official wording)

  14. Feb 16, 2012

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  15. Feb 16, 2012

    The Assembly adopted it.

  16. Feb 13, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  17. Feb 13, 2012

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 8 to 0.

  18. Jan 11, 2012

    The committee held a public hearing.

  19. Dec 29, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  20. Dec 29, 2011

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Labor and Workforce Development.

  21. Dec 29, 2011

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Dec 29, 2011 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Honadel, Kuglitsch, Petersen, Krug, Sinicki, Bernier, Bies, Brooks, Endsley, Jacque, Klenke, Knodl, Litjens, Marklein, Mursau, A. Ott, Petrowski, Petryk, Spanbauer, Staskunas, Steineke, Strachota, Tauchen, Toles, Wynn and Zepnick;Cosponsored by Senators Wanggaard, Galloway, Holperin, Lassa, Moulton and Schultz

  2. Dec 29, 2011 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Labor and Workforce Development

  3. Dec 29, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Jan 11, 2012 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Jan 27, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Honadel

  6. Feb 1, 2012 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  7. Feb 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Labor and Workforce Development, Ayes 8, Noes 0

  8. Feb 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Labor and Workforce Development, Ayes 8, Noes 0

  9. Feb 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  10. Feb 14, 2012 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 2-16-2012 by committee on Rules

  11. Feb 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Honadel

  12. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  13. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 1 adopted

  14. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 adopted

  15. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representatives Pasch, Barca, Richards, Mason and Sinicki

  16. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 laid on table, Ayes 58, Noes 37

  17. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Referred to joint committee on Finance

  18. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and taken up

  19. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  20. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  21. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 95, Noes 0

  22. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Representatives Loudenbeck, Barca, Tranel, Seidel, Kestell, J. Ott, Pridemore, Van Roy, Thiesfeldt, T. Larson, Williams, Danou, Billings, C. Taylor, E. Coggs, Hulsey, Pope-Roberts, Ringhand, Bewley, Pasch, Bernard Schaber, Clark, Milroy and Fields added as coauthors

  23. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  24. Feb 17, 2012 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  25. Feb 17, 2012 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  26. Feb 17, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  27. Feb 20, 2012 · Senate

    Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2

  28. Feb 20, 2012 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-21-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  29. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Senator Darling added as a cosponsor

  30. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Read a second time

  31. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  32. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  33. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 33, Noes 0

  34. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  35. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  36. Mar 1, 2012 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled

  37. Mar 9, 2012 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 3-9-2012

  38. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor with partial veto on 3-12-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 123

  39. Mar 14, 2012 · Assembly

    Published 3-26-2012

  40. May 22, 2012 · Assembly

    Partial veto placed on calendar 5-22-2012 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  41. May 23, 2012 · Assembly

    Partial veto failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(b)

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Partial veto

Wisconsin's governor can strike parts of a budget bill and sign the rest into law.

More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Partial veto

Wisconsin's governor can strike parts of a budget bill and sign the rest into law.

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote