Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
registration and operation of all-terrain vehicles and utility terrain vehicles, granting rule-making authority, and making appropriations.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) regulates the
operation of all-terrain vehicles (ATVs). DNR also regulates utility terrain vehicles
(UTVs), in consultation with the Department of Transportation, under a pilot
program that expires on June 30, 2012.
UTV pilot program
Under current law, a UTV is defined as a motor driven device, other than a golf
cart or low-speed vehicle, that is designed to be used primarily off of a highway and
that has, and was originally manufactured with, certain features, including a gross
weight of more than 900 pounds but not more than 1,999 pounds, a cargo or dump
box, four or more low-pressure tires, non-straddling seats for at least two occupants,
and certain safety systems.
The UTV pilot program allows DNR, a federal agency, a county, or a
municipality to designate an ATV route or trail within its respective jurisdiction for
use by persons operating UTVs. The UTV pilot program provides that if a county
adopts a resolution electing to participate in the pilot program, then the resolution
applies to all of the municipalities within the county unless a municipality adopts a
resolution to opt out of the program.
Under the UTV pilot program, no person may operate a UTV on a designated
ATV route or trail unless DNR registers the UTV. The UTV pilot program authorizes
DNR to register and charge registration fees for UTVs in the same manner as it
registers and charges registration fees for ATVs that are registered for public use
under current law. Under the UTV pilot program, certain laws that apply to ATVs
also apply to UTVs, including traffic citation laws, rules of operation, prohibitions
on operation while intoxicated, and certain equipment requirements. The UTV pilot
program prohibits a person who is younger than 16 from operating a UTV and
requires a person who is born on or after January 1, 1988, and who operates a UTV
to hold a valid all-terrain vehicle safety certificate.
UTV operation and funding under the bill
This bill eliminates the UTV pilot program and establishes a permanent
method for regulating the use of UTVs on ATV routes and trails. As with the pilot
program, the bill authorizes DNR and federal agencies, counties, and municipalities
to designate ATV routes and trails that may be used by persons operating UTVs.
Under the bill, as under the pilot program, most of the laws that apply to the
operation of ATVs also apply to the operation of UTVs. As under the UTV pilot
program, the bill allows the operation of UTVs only on those ATV routes and trails
that are specifically designated as open to UTV operation. The bill requires DNR to
establish uniform signs and standards for the operation of UTVs on ATV routes and
trails. The definition of a UTV under the bill is similar to the definition under the
pilot program except that it also specifies that a vehicle does not qualify as a UTV
if the vehicle would meet federal motor vehicle safety standards, or if it is a dune
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 14, Noes 0
Passed 14–0 Feb 14, 2012 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Dec 29, 2011 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Severson, Rivard, Endsley, Krug, Marklein, Nygren, A. Ott, Petryk, Spanbauer, Strachota, Tauchen, Tiffany and Tranel;Cosponsored by Senators Leibham, Holperin, Harsdorf, Moulton, Hansen, Lassa and Taylor
- Dec 29, 2011 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation
- Jan 4, 2012 · Assembly
Representative Brooks added as a coauthor
- Jan 24, 2012 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Severson
- Jan 27, 2012 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 31, 2012 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Feb 6, 2012 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Severson
- Feb 7, 2012 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 7, 2012 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Feb 14, 2012 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 14, Noes 0
- Feb 14, 2012 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 14, Noes 0
- Feb 14, 2012 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 14, 2012 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 14, Noes 0
- Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 2-21-2012 by committee on Rules
- Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly
Laid on the table
- Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1