Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
the performance of highway improvement projects by a county and private construction projects by a political subdivision.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, as created in the 2011 Biennial Budget Act (Act 32), a county
is generally prohibited from using its own workforce to perform a highway
improvement project on a highway under the jurisdiction of another county or a
municipality that is located in a different county. A city with a population of 5,000
or more is prohibited from having a highway improvement project performed by a
county workforce unless the project is under, and meets the requirements of, the local
roads improvement program. Also under current law, as created in Act 32, a city,
village, town, or county may not use its own workforce to perform a construction
project for which a private person is financially responsible. This bill eliminates
these prohibitions.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Full history
- Dec 29, 2011 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Bewley, Doyle, A. Ott, Molepske Jr, Danou, Berceau, Bernard Schaber, Spanbauer, Clark, Ringhand, Bies, Brooks and Hintz;Cosponsored by Senators Vinehout, Lassa, Jauch, T. Cullen, Schultz, S. Coggs and C. Larson
- Dec 29, 2011 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation
- Feb 2, 2012 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1