Skip to content

Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session

AB 455

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

the use of seclusion and physical restraint on pupils in public schools.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Effective September 1, 2012, this bill prohibits an employee of a public school

(including a charter school) and certain other individuals who provide services for

the benefit of a public school from using seclusion or physical restraint on a pupil at

a public school except under certain conditions. Seclusion is the involuntary

confinement of a pupil, apart from other pupils, in a room or area from which the

pupil is physically prevented from leaving. Physical restraint is a restriction that

immobilizes or reduces the ability of a pupil to freely move his or her torso, arms, legs,

or head.

An individual covered by the bill may use seclusion on a pupil only if all of the

following apply:

1. The pupil's behavior presents a clear, present, and immediate risk to the

physical safety of the pupil or others and it is the least restrictive intervention

available.

2. The seclusion lasts only as long as necessary to resolve the risk to physical

safety.

3. A covered individual maintains constant supervision of the pupil.

4. The seclusion room or area is free of objects or fixtures that may injure the

pupil.

5. The pupil has adequate access to bathroom facilities, drinking water,

necessary medication, and meals.

6. No door connecting the seclusion room or area to other rooms or areas is

capable of being locked.

A covered individual may use physical restraint on a pupil only if all of the

following apply:

1. The pupil's behavior presents a clear, present, and immediate risk to the

physical safety of the pupil or others and it is the least restrictive intervention

available.

2. The degree of force used and the duration of the physical restraint do not

exceed the degree and duration that are reasonable and necessary to resolve the risk.

3. There are no medical contraindications to the use of physical restraint.

4. None of the following maneuvers or techniques are used:

a. Those that do not give adequate attention and care to protecting the pupil's

head.

b. Those that cause chest compression.

c. Those that place pressure or weight on the pupil's neck or throat

5. It does not constitute corporal punishment.

6. Neither mechanical nor chemical restraints are used.

Whenever seclusion or physical restraint is used on a pupil, the school principal

must notify the pupil's parent and prepare a written report.

The bill generally prohibits a covered individual from using physical restraint

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Endsley (R) , Kestell (R) , Pasch (D) , Pocan (D) , Pope-Roberts (D) , Ripp (R) , Sinicki (D) , Spanbauer (R)

3 cosponsors

Lassa (D) , Olsen (R) , Schultz (R)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 10, Noes 0

Passed 10–0 Jan 27, 2012 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Jan 3, 2012 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Kestell, Pasch, Endsley, Pocan, Pope-Roberts, Ripp, Sinicki and Spanbauer;Cosponsored by Senators Olsen, Lassa and Schultz

  2. Jan 3, 2012 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Education

  3. Jan 10, 2012 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Jan 10, 2012 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Jan 18, 2012 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Jan 27, 2012 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 10, Noes 0

  7. Jan 27, 2012 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  8. Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 3-6-2012 by committee on Rules

  9. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:11 A.M. on 3-13-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22

  10. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  11. Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1