Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
various changes in the unemployment insurance law.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill makes various changes in the unemployment insurance (UI) law.
Significant provisions include:
Discharges for certain conduct or violations of certain work rules or policies
Currently, if an employee is discharged for misconduct connected with his or her
employment (interpreted by the courts to include only misconduct that evinces
willful or wanton disregard of the employer's interests or carelessness or negligence
in the performance of duties to such degree or recurrence as to manifest culpability
or wrongful intent or exhibiting such behavior as to endanger the physical safety of
persons on the work site) the employee is ineligible to receive benefits until seven
weeks have elapsed since the end of the week in which the discharge occurs and the
employee earns wages, or certain other amounts treated as wages, after the week in
which the discharge occurs equal to at least 14 times the employee's weekly benefit
rate in employment covered by the unemployment insurance law of any state or the
federal government. In addition, all wages earned with the employer that discharges
the employee are excluded in determining the amount of any future benefits to which
the employee is entitled. However, if an employee is discharged for failing to notify
an employer of tardiness or absenteeism that becomes excessive under certain
conditions, the employee is ineligible to receive benefits until six weeks have elapsed
since the end of the week in which the discharge occurs and the employee earns
wages, or certain other amounts treated as wages, after the week in which the
discharge occurs equal to at least six times the the employee's weekly benefit rate in
work covered by the unemployment insurance law of any state or the federal
government. In addition, if an employee's work is suspended by an employer for good
cause connected with the employee's work, the employee is ineligible to receive
benefits until three weeks have elapsed since the end of the week in which the
suspension occurs or until the suspension ends, whichever occurs first.
This bill deletes the current disqualifiers for discharges resulting from
absenteeism or tardiness and for disciplinary suspensions but retains the
disqualifier for misconduct. The bill also creates a new disqualifier that applies to
certain discharges or suspensions that do not result from misconduct, as currently
defined. Under the bill, an employee who is discharged for intentional conduct
connected with his or her employment that a reasonable person would not engage in,
if the conduct is documented by the employee's employer and the employee knew or
should have known that the conduct would not be considered reasonable by the
employer, or for a knowing violation of a reasonable and uniformly enforced rule or
policy of his or her employer, when reasonably applied, is ineligible to receive benefits
until six weeks have elapsed since the end of the week in which the discharge occurs
and the employee earns wages, or certain other amounts treated as wages, after the
week in which the discharge occurs equal to at least six times the employee's weekly
benefit rate in employment covered by the unemployment insurance law of any state
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Full history
- Jan 4, 2012 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Ballweg, Brooks, Honadel, Litjens, Marklein, A. Ott, Rivard, Tauchen and Wynn
- Jan 4, 2012 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Labor and Workforce Development
- Jan 11, 2012 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Jan 12, 2012 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1