Skip to content

Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session

AB 463

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

permits for discharges into wetlands; wetland mitigation; wetland mapping and delineation; fees for permits and other authorizations or determinations by the Department of Natural Resources relating to structures, deposits, and other activities in or near navigable waters; making appropriations; and providing penalties.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Wetland permitting and mitigation

Under current law, there are two permitting procedures for discharging

dredged or fill material into a wetland depending on whether the wetland is subject

to federal jurisdiction. Under federal law, activities involving the discharge of

dredged or fill material into wetlands subject to federal jurisdiction (federal

wetlands) must comply with certain guidelines contained in regulations

promulgated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACE). Wetlands that are exempt

from federal jurisdiction are those that are nonnavigable and that are isolated,

intrastate wetlands. Current state law regulates discharges in these wetlands

(nonfederal wetlands).

Current law makes a distinction between wetlands that are in, or that are in

proximity to, an area of special natural resource interest (ASNRI) wetlands and

those wetlands that are outside these areas. Current law defines ASNRI as being

an area that has significant ecological, cultural, aesthetic, educational, recreational,

or scientific value and specifically lists certain areas.

Under current law, a discharge into a federal or nonfederal wetland will be

authorized under an individual or general water quality certification only if the

discharge complies with all of the water quality standards that apply to wetlands.

These standards are promulgated as rules by the Department of Natural Resources

(DNR) and require that various functional values of wetlands be protected from

adverse impacts. These functional values include providing protection from

flooding, recharging groundwater, and providing habitat for wildlife.

Under current law, before ACE may issue a federal permit applicable to a

federal wetland, or authorize an activity pursuant to a general federal permit, DNR

must issue a water quality certification. For a nonfederal wetland, the discharge

must be authorized by a water quality certification issued by DNR but no federal

permit is required. For a nonfederal wetland, the discharge may be authorized by

an individual certification or a general certification. Under current law, DNR may

issue a general water quality certification for types of discharges that are similar in

nature and will cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Under current law,

DNR must issue general water quality certifications that are consistent with all of

the general permits issued under federal law.

Under rules promulgated by DNR, in order for DNR to issue an individual

wetland water quality certification DNR must first find that no practicable

alternative exists which would avoid causing adverse impacts to the wetland and

that all practicable measures will be taken to minimize the adverse impacts to the

functional value of the affected wetlands. DNR then considers any proposed

mitigation and various other factors to determine whether there will be an adverse

impact to wetland functional values or to water quality that is significant or other

environmental consequences that are significant. The factors used in this step of the

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Brooks (R) , Endsley (R) , Honadel (R) , Jacque (R) , Marklein (R) , Mursau (R) , Rivard (R) , Stone (R)

2 cosponsors

Kedzie (R) , Schultz (R)

Votes

Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Natural Resources, Ayes 14, Noes 2

Passed 14–2 Jan 24, 2012 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 10 adoption recommended by committee on Natural Resources, Ayes 16, Noes 0

Passed 16–0 Jan 24, 2012 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Jan 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Mursau, Rivard, Brooks, Honadel, Jacque, Endsley, Marklein and Stone;Cosponsored by Senators Kedzie and Schultz

  2. Jan 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Natural Resources

  3. Jan 10, 2012 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Jan 17, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Mursau

  5. Jan 18, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 8 offered by Representatives Molepske Jr and Mason

  6. Jan 18, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 9 offered by Representatives Molepske Jr and Mason

  7. Jan 18, 2012 · Assembly

    LRB correction

  8. Jan 18, 2012 · Assembly

    LRB correction

  9. Jan 18, 2012 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  10. Jan 18, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 10 offered by committee on Natural Resources

  11. Jan 18, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representatives Molepske Jr and Mason

  12. Jan 18, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 3 offered by Representatives Molepske Jr and Mason

  13. Jan 18, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 4 offered by Representatives Molepske Jr and Mason

  14. Jan 18, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 5 offered by Representatives Molepske Jr and Mason

  15. Jan 18, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 6 offered by Representatives Molepske Jr and Mason

  16. Jan 18, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 7 offered by Representatives Molepske Jr and Mason

  17. Jan 19, 2012 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  18. Jan 24, 2012 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Natural Resources, Ayes 14, Noes 2

  19. Jan 24, 2012 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 10 adoption recommended by committee on Natural Resources, Ayes 16, Noes 0

  20. Jan 24, 2012 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Natural Resources, Ayes 10, Noes 6

  21. Jan 24, 2012 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  22. Jan 24, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 11 offered by Representative Mursau

  23. Feb 14, 2012 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 2-16-2012 by committee on Rules

  24. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:01 a.m. on 2-21-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 21

  25. Feb 17, 2012 · Assembly

    LRB correction

  26. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    LRB correction

  27. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  28. Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1