Assembly Bill 467
Consideration of certain greenhouse gas emissions in determining requirements applicable to a stationary source of air pollution
Topics: Air pollution, Energy conservation, Natural Resources, Department of: Environmental protection
Became law
The governor signed it on Apr 3, 2012. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Jan 9, 2012
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Jan 26, 2012
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Feb 14, 2012
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2011 Wisconsin Act 171
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 5, 2012: “Published 4-16-2012”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
The federal Clean Air Act allows the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to authorize a state to administer the act if the state's air pollution control program is at least as stringent as the act. Currently, EPA delegates the authority to administer the federal Clean Air Act in this state to the Department of Natural Resources (DNR).
Current federal law and state law require construction permits and operation permits for certain stationary sources of air pollution, based on the amount of specified air contaminants emitted by the sources. Current law also requires certain stationary sources for which an air pollution permit is required to use what is called best available control technology (BACT) to control emissions of certain air pollutants. BACT requires the maximum degree of emission reduction achievable as specified by the permitting agency on a case-by-case basis, considering energy, economic, and environmental impacts.
Read the full summary Show less
EPA promulgated regulations, effective in 2011, requiring stationary sources that emit over threshold amounts of greenhouse gases to obtain construction and operation permits and requiring those sources to use BACT for greenhouse gas emissions. Greenhouse gases are gases, including carbon dioxide, that trap heat in the atmosphere. DNR promulgated corresponding rules. More recently, EPA modified its regulations by providing that, before July 21, 2014, carbon dioxide emissions from the burning or decomposition of organic material, other than fossil fuels, will not be counted toward the threshold for permitting because of greenhouse gas emissions or toward the requirement to use BACT. The modified federal regulation excludes from counting toward the threshold, for example, carbon dioxide emissions resulting from the decomposition of waste in a landfill, from burning gas derived from a landfill or manure digester, and from burning wood, wood waste, and other biomass.
This bill prohibits DNR from considering carbon dioxide emissions from the burning or decomposition of organic material, other than fossil fuels, in determining whether an air pollution construction permit or operation permit is required because of greenhouse gas emissions and in determining whether a stationary source is required to use BACT for greenhouse gas emissions, as long as this prohibition is consistent with federal law.
Who's behind it
9 lawmakers are its . 8 are Republicans and 1 is a Democrat.
2 more lawmakers .
See all 11 names Hide the names
Authors (9)
- Alvin Ott · Republican, Assembly
- Joan Ballweg · Republican, Senate
- Edward Brooks · Republican, Assembly
- Mike Endsley · Republican, Assembly
- John Klenke · Republican, Assembly
- Scott Krug · Republican, Assembly
- Michelle Litjens · Republican, Assembly
- Louis Molepske Jr. · Democrat, Assembly
- Jim Steineke · Republican, Assembly
Signed on in support (2)
- Pam Galloway · Republican, Senate
- André Jacque · Republican, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 4 votes on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Natural Resources vote to recommend it
Passed, 16 to 0 · Jan 24, 2012
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Natural Resources, Ayes 16, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate Committee on Natural Resources and Environment vote on an amendment
Passed, 7 to 0 · Feb 8, 2012
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report introduction and adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Natural Resources and Environment, Ayes 7, Noes 0 by committee on Natural Resources and Environment”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote
Passed, 3 to 2 · Feb 13, 2012
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote on an amendment
Passed, 90 to 5 · Feb 21, 2012
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Senate amendment 1 concurred in, Ayes 90, Noes 5”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 5, 2012
The new law was published.
-
Apr 3, 2012
The governor signed it. It became 2011 Wisconsin Act 171.
-
Mar 30, 2012
Sent to the governor.
-
Feb 21, 2012
“Action ordered immediately messaged” (the official wording)
-
Feb 16, 2012
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Feb 16, 2012
The Assembly adopted it.
-
Feb 14, 2012
The Senate passed it too, 33 to 0.
-
Feb 14, 2012
The Senate adopted it.
-
Feb 13, 2012
“Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 3, Noes 2” (the official wording)
-
Feb 13, 2012
Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.
-
Feb 8, 2012
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 0.
-
Feb 2, 2012
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Jan 31, 2012
Sent to the Senate Committee on Natural Resources and Environment.
-
Jan 27, 2012
The Senate received it.
-
Jan 26, 2012
The Assembly passed it.
-
Jan 24, 2012
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Jan 24, 2012
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 16 to 0.
-
Jan 18, 2012
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Jan 17, 2012
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Jan 11, 2012
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Jan 9, 2012
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Natural Resources.
-
Jan 9, 2012
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Jan 9, 2012 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Klenke, Brooks, Litjens, Steineke, Krug, A. Ott, Endsley, Ballweg and Molepske Jr;Cosponsored by Senator Galloway
- Jan 9, 2012 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Natural Resources
- Jan 11, 2012 · Assembly
Representative Jacque added as a coauthor
- Jan 17, 2012 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 18, 2012 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Jan 18, 2012 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Jan 24, 2012 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by committee on Natural Resources, Ayes 16, Noes 0
- Jan 24, 2012 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Jan 24, 2012 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 1-26-2012 by committee on Rules
- Jan 26, 2012 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Jan 26, 2012 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Jan 26, 2012 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Jan 26, 2012 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed
- Jan 26, 2012 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Jan 27, 2012 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Jan 31, 2012 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Natural Resources and Environment
- Feb 2, 2012 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Feb 8, 2012 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Feb 8, 2012 · Senate
Report introduction and adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Natural Resources and Environment, Ayes 7, Noes 0 by committee on Natural Resources and Environment
- Feb 8, 2012 · Senate
Report concurrence as amended recommended by committee on Natural Resources and Environment, Ayes 7, Noes 0
- Feb 8, 2012 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Feb 13, 2012 · Senate
Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 3, Noes 2
- Feb 13, 2012 · Senate
Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 3, Noes 2
- Feb 13, 2012 · Senate
Placed on calendar 2-14-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Feb 14, 2012 · Senate
Read a second time
- Feb 14, 2012 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 adopted
- Feb 14, 2012 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 14, 2012 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Feb 14, 2012 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 33, Noes 0
- Feb 14, 2012 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly
Received from Senate amended and concurred in as amended (Senate amendment 1 adopted)
- Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 2-21-2012 by committee on Rules
- Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly
Senate amendment 1 concurred in, Ayes 90, Noes 5
- Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly
Action ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 1, 2012 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled
- Mar 30, 2012 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 3-30-2012
- Apr 3, 2012 · Assembly
Report approved by the Governor on 4-2-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 171
- Apr 5, 2012 · Assembly
Published 4-16-2012
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote