Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
removing cap on enrollment of Family Care and other long-term care programs.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, Family Care, Family Care Partnership, the Program of
All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE), and the self-directed services option
known as IRIS (collectively known as long-term care programs) provide
community-based, long-term care services to individuals who meet certain
functional and financial criteria and who are either frail elders or adults with
physical or developmental disabilities. In a county where a long-term care program
is available, the 2011-2013 biennial budget act (
2011 Wisconsin Act 32
) caps the
enrollment in long-term care programs until June 30, 2013, for a resource center
service area at the number of individuals enrolled in those programs in that service
area on June 30, 2011, with exceptions for certain individuals relocating from an
institutional facility. This bill removes the cap on enrollment in long-term care
programs.
Family Care currently is not available in all counties. The 2011-2013 biennial
budget act prohibits the Department of Health Services (DHS) from contracting with
entities to administer Family Care in a county that does not administer Family Care
as of July 1, 2011, unless DHS determines that administering Family Care in that
county would be more cost-effective than the current long-term care service delivery
mechanism. This bill eliminates the prohibition on expansion of Family Care.
The 2011-2013 biennial budget act allocates moneys for DHS to provide
services and support items offered through Family Care to individuals who are on
a waiting list for a long-term care program and who are in urgent need of long-term
care services, as determined by DHS. This bill eliminates that funding allocation.
Currently, as required by the 2011-2013 biennial budget act, DHS must study
various aspects of the cost-effectiveness of the long-term care programs. This bill
does not alter that requirement.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: A. Ott (R) , Bernier (R) , Brooks (R) , Danou (D) , Doyle (D) , Endsley (R) , Fields (D) , Grigsby (D) , Jorgensen (D) , Kaufert (R) , Kestell (R) , Molepske Jr (D) , Pasch (D) , Petryk (R) , Richards (D) , Ripp (R) , Sinicki (D) , Spanbauer (R) , Staskunas (D) , Steinbrink (D) , Stone (R) , Tranel (R) , Van Roy (R) , Wynn (R) , Ziegelbauer (I)
Votes
Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Aging and Long-Term Care, Ayes 4, Noes 2
Passed 4–2 Feb 29, 2012 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Jan 18, 2012 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Kaufert, Kestell, Van Roy, Brooks, Doyle, A. Ott, Ziegelbauer, Bernier, Wynn, Richards, Stone, Steinbrink, Ripp, Tranel, Molepske Jr, Grigsby, Endsley, Fields, Staskunas, Jorgensen, Pasch, Petryk, Danou, Sinicki and Spanbauer;Cosponsored by Senators Moulton, Vukmir, Carpenter, Harsdorf, Erpenbach, Wanggaard, Jauch, Risser, C. Larson and Holperin
- Jan 18, 2012 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Aging and Long-Term Care
- Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 23, 2012 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Feb 24, 2012 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Knodl
- Feb 28, 2012 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Feb 29, 2012 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Aging and Long-Term Care, Ayes 4, Noes 2
- Feb 29, 2012 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Aging and Long-Term Care, Ayes 6, Noes 0
- Feb 29, 2012 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 3-6-2012 by committee on Rules
- Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Kooyenga
- Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 withdrawn and returned to author
- Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representatives Bernard Schaber, Barca and Pasch
- Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 11:14 A.M. on 3-13-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Laid on the table
- Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1