Skip to content

Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session

AB 50

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

agreements relating to motor carrier liability.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, a party shipping goods with a motor carrier and the motor

carrier are generally free to agree to the terms under which the motor carrier will

transport the goods and provide related shipping services. Where certain shipping

documents are used, the law includes certain presumptions but these presumptions

may generally be varied by agreement.

This bill prohibits, and renders void and unenforceable, any provision of a

motor carrier transportation contract, or covenant or agreement collateral to or

affecting a motor carrier transportation contract, from indemnifying, holding

harmless, or requiring the motor carrier to provide a defense to the "promisee" or its

employees or affiliates from or against any liability for loss or damage resulting from

the negligence or intentional acts or omissions of the promisee or its employees or

affiliates. Under the bill, a "promisee" is a person, including an individual or a

business entity, that enters into a motor carrier transportation contract with a motor

carrier (typically the shipper of goods). An "affiliate" of the promisee includes agents

of the promisee and independent contractors directly responsible to the promisee.

A "motor carrier transportation contract" means any agreement, regardless of

whether it is written, oral, express, or implied, between a motor carrier and a

promisee covering the transportation of property for hire by the motor carrier; the

motor carrier's entrance on property for the purpose of loading, unloading, or

transporting property for hire; or any service of the motor carrier incidental to either

of these activities, including the storage of property.

Sponsors

Introduced by: A. Ott (R) , Bies (R) , Brooks (R) , Kaufert (R) , Klenke (R) , Nygren (R) , Van Roy (R)

5 cosponsors

Galloway (R) , Kedzie (R) , Lasee (R) , Lazich (R) , Schultz (R)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 15, Noes 0

Passed 15–0 Jun 2, 2011 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Mar 15, 2011 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Nygren, Klenke, Bies, Brooks, A. Ott, Van Roy and Kaufert;Cosponsored by Senators Lazich, Lasee, Galloway, Kedzie and Schultz

  2. Mar 15, 2011 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation

  3. May 24, 2011 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Jun 2, 2011 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  5. Jun 2, 2011 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 15, Noes 0

  6. Jun 2, 2011 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  7. Jun 2, 2011 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 6-8-2011 by committee on Rules

  8. Jun 8, 2011 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  9. Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1