Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Assembly Bill 517

The length of vehicles that may be operated on a highway and granting rule-making authority

Topics: Bus and truck: Taxation or registration, Metropolitan transportation, Road, Transportation, Department of: Vehicles

Stopped before the full Assembly voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 2, 2012

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, a person may not operate on a highway any combination of two vehicles (vehicle combination) with an overall length in excess of 65 feet unless a specific exception applies or the person has a permit to exceed these lengths.

This bill increases the generally applicable overall length limit for vehicle combinations from 65 feet to 70 feet. However, the Department of Transportation (DOT) may, by rule, establish exceptions to this general length limit with respect to specific types of vehicles or designated highways. Under the bill, motor bus-trailer combinations owned and operated by, and for the exclusive use of, nonprofit organizations are subject to the general length limit of 70 feet, an increase from their length limit of 58 feet under current law.

Read the full summary

Under current law, there is an exception to the general length limit that allows for the operation of tractor-semitrailer combinations with an overall length not exceeding 75 feet on the state trunk highway system except those parts designated by DOT by rule as ineligible for this length limit or as long truck routes for which there is no length limit. In addition, there is an exception to the general single vehicle length limit that allows for the operation of a semitrailer as part of a vehicle combination if the semitrailer does not exceed 53 feet, its kingpin-to-axle length does not exceed 43 feet, and it is operated on the state trunk highway system except those parts designated by DOT by rule as ineligible for this length limit.

Under this bill, this 75 feet length limit exception for tractor-semitrailer combinations, and this 53 feet length limit exception for certain semitrailers, apply on all highways, not just state trunk highways, subject to the same exceptions for designated ineligible highways or long truck routes that apply under current law.

Under current law, the overall length limit for combinations of two or three vehicles operated or transported by the drive-away method in saddlemount combination is 65 feet. The term "saddlemount combination" is neither defined nor described by statute, but DOT defines it by rule as a combination of vehicles in which a truck or truck tractor tows one or more trucks or truck tractors, each connected by a saddle to the vehicle in front of it; the towed vehicles essentially piggyback the power unit or one another. Also under current law, DOT and local authorities may issue permits for combinations of two or three vehicles operated or transported by the drive-away method in saddlemount combination with an overall length not exceeding 65 feet.

This bill increases, from 65 feet to 75 feet, the length limit for combinations of two or three vehicles operated or transported by the drive-away method in saddlemount combination. In addition, the bill eliminates provisions of current law related to the issuance of permits for these vehicle combinations.

The bill also increases, from 65 feet to 66 feet, the vehicle length limit for articulated buses operated in urban areas.

Who's behind it

4 lawmakers are its ⁠. 3 are Republicans. 1 has no party on record.

2 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 6 names

Authors (4)

Signed on in support (2)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Transportation vote to recommend it

Passed, 13 to 0 · Feb 16, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 13, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2012

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Feb 20, 2012

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  3. Feb 16, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  4. Feb 16, 2012

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 13 to 0.

  5. Feb 7, 2012

    The committee held a public hearing.

  6. Feb 2, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Transportation.

  7. Feb 2, 2012

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 2, 2012 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Petrowski, A. Ott and Bies, by request of Department of Transportation;Cosponsored by Senators Lazich and Lasee

  2. Feb 2, 2012 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation

  3. Feb 7, 2012 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Feb 14, 2012 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  5. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 13, Noes 0

  6. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  7. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 2-21-2012 by committee on Rules

  8. Feb 20, 2012 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  9. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  10. Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote