Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Assembly Bill 526

Loans and repayment assistance by a political subdivision for energy and water improvements to premises and collection of the debt by special charge

Topics: Energy conservation, Lien, Municipality: Finance, Real property, Water supply

Stopped before the full Assembly voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 3, 2012

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, a city, village, or town may impose a special charge against real property for services rendered by allocating the cost of the service to the properties that are served. Generally, a special charge is not payable in installments.

Also under current law, a city, village, town, or county (political subdivision) may make a loan to, or enter into a loan repayment agreement with, an owner or lessee of a premises for making or installing certain energy or water efficiency improvements (property assessed clean energy or PACE program). The political subdivision may collect a loan repayment under the PACE program as a special charge. A special charge imposed under the PACE program may be collected in installments.

Read the full summary

Under this bill, a political subdivision that imposes a special charge under the PACE program and allows the charge to be paid in installments may allow a third party that has provided financing for the PACE program project to collect the installments. Also under this bill, a delinquent PACE program special charge installment becomes a lien on the property that benefits from the PACE program project. Also under this bill, if the political subdivision funds a PACE program project that costs $250,000 or more, the political subdivision must require the owner of the premises to obtain a written guarantee from the contractor or project engineer that the PACE program project will achieve a savings-to-investment ratio greater than 1.0 or that the contractor or engineer will pay the owner any shortfall in savings. For a PACE program project that costs less than $250,000, a political subdivision may require a third party technical review of the projected savings before making a PACE program loan or agreement.

Who's behind it

5 representatives are its ⁠. 4 are Republicans and 1 is a Democrat.

3 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 8 names

Authors (5)

Signed on in support (3)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Energy and Utilities vote to recommend it

Passed, 10 to 0 · Feb 20, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Energy and Utilities, Ayes 10, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2012

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Feb 27, 2012

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  3. Feb 20, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  4. Feb 20, 2012

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 10 to 0.

  5. Feb 7, 2012

    The committee held a public hearing.

  6. Feb 6, 2012

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  7. Feb 3, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Energy and Utilities.

  8. Feb 3, 2012

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 3, 2012 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Weininger, Tauchen, Spanbauer, T. Larson and Molepske Jr;Cosponsored by Senators Cowles, Holperin and Wanggaard

  2. Feb 3, 2012 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Energy and Utilities

  3. Feb 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Feb 7, 2012 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Feb 20, 2012 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Energy and Utilities, Ayes 10, Noes 0

  7. Feb 20, 2012 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  8. Feb 27, 2012 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  9. Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 3-6-2012 by committee on Rules

  10. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:22 A.M. on 3-13-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22

  11. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  12. Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote