Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
commissioners of the Public Service Commission; notices, orders, and determinations of the commission; certificates of authority issued by the commission; approval of contracts by the commission; electricity sales from certain wholesale merchant plants; public utility removal of certain electric service lines; renewable resource credits; tampering or interfering with utility equipment; granting rule-making authority; and providing penalties.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
PSC notices, orders, and determinations.
Under current law, the Public
Service Commission (PSC) is allowed to initiate, investigate, and order a hearing at
its discretion upon such notice as the PSC deems proper. This bill allows the PSC
to provide the notice by personal delivery, mail, electronic mail, or any other
reasonable method. The bill also allows the PSC to provide notice in such manner
in contested cases, which are administrative proceedings involving parties whose
interests are determined or adversely affected by the PSC. Current law generally
requires notice for a contested case to be provided by mail.
Also under current law, unless the PSC specifies a different effective date, the
PSC's orders and determinations take effect 20 days after the PSC files and serves
an order or determination on the parties to the proceeding in which the PSC made
the order or determination or on the parties' attorneys. This bill provides that an
order or determination takes effect on the day after the order or determination is filed
and served, unless the PSC specifies a different effective date. Current law also
specifies that service must be done by personal delivery or mail. This bill allows
service to be done by personal delivery, mail, electronic mail, or any other method
that the PSC determines is likely to reach the parties or attorneys.
Firm sales of electricity to affiliates.
Current law generally prohibits an
affiliated interest from making a firm sale of electricity of three years or more to a
public utility with which the affiliated interest is affiliated. Under current law, an
affiliated interest is considered to be affiliated with a public utility if the affiliated
interest has specified ownership or control interests in common with the public
utility. Current law defines "firm sale" as a sale in which electricity is intended to
be available to a purchaser at all times during a specified period on an
uninterruptible basis. This bill creates an exception to the prohibition for a firm sale
from an affiliated interest's wholesale merchant plant located in Adams or Juneau
county to an affiliated public utility, but only if the affiliated public utility owned,
operated, or controlled the affiliated interest before January 1, 2012. Under current
law, which the bill does not affect, a "wholesale merchant plant" is defined, in part,
as an electric generating plant that does not provide retail electric service.
Contracts or arrangements with affiliates.
Current law generally requires
the PSC to approve contracts or arrangements between public utilities and their
affiliated interests. An exception to the requirement applies if the amount of
consideration involved in the contract or arrangement does not exceed $25,000 or 5
percent of the equity of the public utility, whichever is smaller. This bill revises the
exception so that PSC approval is not required if the amount of consideration does
not exceed $250,000 or 5 percent of the equity, whichever is smaller. In addition,
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: A. Ott (R) , Ballweg (R) , Bies (R) , Brooks (R) , Danou (D) , Endsley (R) , Hintz (D) , Honadel (R) , J. Ott (R) , Jacque (R) , Kestell (R) , Klenke (R) , Krug (R) , Marklein (R) , Molepske Jr (D) , Mursau (R) , Nerison (R) , Nygren (R) , Petersen (R) , Petrowski (R) , Petryk (R) , Rivard (R) , Staskunas (D) , T. Larson (R) , Tauchen (R) , Tiffany (R) , Weininger (R) , Zepnick (D) , Ziegelbauer (I)
Votes
Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Energy and Utilities, Ayes 10, Noes 0
Passed 10–0 Feb 16, 2012 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Feb 3, 2012 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Klenke, Zepnick, Ballweg, Bies, Brooks, Danou, Endsley, Hintz, Jacque, Kestell, Krug, T. Larson, Marklein, Molepske Jr, Mursau, Nerison, Nygren, A. Ott, J. Ott, Petersen, Petrowski, Petryk, Rivard, Staskunas, Tauchen, Tiffany, Weininger, Ziegelbauer and Honadel;Cosponsored by Senators Zipperer, Holperin, Hansen, King, Lasee, Olsen, Shilling, Taylor and Galloway
- Feb 3, 2012 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Energy and Utilities
- Feb 7, 2012 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 7, 2012 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 7, 2012 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Feb 7, 2012 · Assembly
Representative Bernier added as a coauthor
- Feb 14, 2012 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Energy and Utilities, Ayes 10, Noes 0
- Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 2-21-2012 by committee on Rules
- Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by committee on Energy and Utilities
- Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Energy and Utilities, Ayes 10, Noes 0
- Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly
Laid on the table
- Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1