Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Assembly Bill 529

Licensing of taxicabs by a 1st class city

Topics: Milwaukee: City, Taxi

Passed the Assembly, then stopped

The Assembly passed it on Feb 21, 2012, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to ⁠. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 3, 2012

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Feb 21, 2012

  4. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, a city, village, or town may regulate and license taxicabs and chauffeurs and operators of taxicabs and may prohibit the use of motor vehicles for taxicab purposes on the highways of the city, village, or town if the vehicle or operator of the vehicle is unlicensed.

Under this bill, a 1st class city (currently, only the city of Milwaukee) may regulate and license taxicabs by use of a taxicab medallion license system. Under this system, medallion licenses are initially issued to certain currently licensed taxicab operators upon payment of a fee not to exceed $500 and, annually, the city may issue additional medallion licenses by public auction. Not more than an additional two percent of the initial medallion licenses issued during the first five years, and one percent of existing medallion licenses thereafter, may be issued annually. Medallion licenses are transferable upon the payment of a transfer fee to the city and a holder of a medallion license may allow another person to operate a taxicab under his or her medallion license.

Who's behind it

8 lawmakers are its ⁠. 6 are Democrats and 2 are Republicans.

3 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 11 names

Authors (8)

Signed on in support (3)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Transportation vote on an amendment

Passed, 13 to 0 · Feb 16, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 13, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 55 to 39 · Feb 21, 2012 · 5 didn't vote

See how each of the 99 representatives voted

D: Democrat, I: Independent, R: Republican

Yes (55)

No (39)

Didn't vote (5)

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 55, Noes 39”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2012

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Mar 8, 2012

    The committee held a public hearing.

  3. Feb 22, 2012

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Transportation and Elections.

  4. Feb 22, 2012

    The Senate received it.

  5. Feb 21, 2012

    The Assembly passed it, 55 to 39.

  6. Feb 21, 2012

    The Assembly adopted it.

  7. Feb 21, 2012

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  8. Feb 16, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  9. Feb 16, 2012

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 13 to 0.

  10. Feb 14, 2012

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  11. Feb 7, 2012

    The committee held a public hearing.

  12. Feb 3, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Transportation.

  13. Feb 3, 2012

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 3, 2012 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Farrow, Zamarripa, Young, Stone, D. Cullen, Richards, Fields and Zepnick;Cosponsored by Senators Lasee, Taylor and Darling

  2. Feb 3, 2012 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation

  3. Feb 7, 2012 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Feb 10, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Farrow

  5. Feb 14, 2012 · Assembly

    Representative E. Coggs added as a coauthor

  6. Feb 14, 2012 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  7. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 13, Noes 0

  8. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 13, Noes 0

  9. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  10. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 2-21-2012 by committee on Rules

  11. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  12. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  13. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 adopted

  14. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  15. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  16. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 55, Noes 39

  17. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  18. Feb 22, 2012 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  19. Feb 22, 2012 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation and Elections

  20. Mar 8, 2012 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  21. Mar 15, 2012 · Senate

    Senator Darling withdrawn as a cosponsor

  22. Mar 23, 2012 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote