Skip to content

Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session

AB 534

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

intentional program violations of public assistance programs.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

The Wisconsin Works (W-2) program provides work experience and benefits for

low-income custodial parents who are at least 18 years old, as well as job search

assistance to noncustodial parents who are required to pay child support, to minor

custodial parents, and to pregnant women who are not custodial parents. Under

Wisconsin Shares, which is also part of the W-2 program, an individual who is the

parent of a child under the age of 13 or, if the child is disabled, under the age of 19,

who needs child care services to participate in various educational or work activities,

and who satisfies other eligibility criteria, may receive a child care subsidy for child

care services. The W-2 program is currently administered by the Department of

Children and Families (DCF). DCF also administers a program that provides

emergency assistance to needy persons in cases of fire, flood, natural disaster, energy

crisis, or homelessness or impending homelessness (emergency assistance program).

Under current law, if a court finds or if it is determined after an administrative

hearing that an individual has intentionally violated any statute or rule governing

the W-2 program on three separate occasions, a W-2 agency may permanently deny

the individual benefits under the W-2 program. Under this bill, a W-2 agency, an

entity administering Wisconsin Shares, or DCF is required deny an individual

benefits under the W-2 program or the emergency assistance program as follows:

1. For a first intentional program violation, for six months.

2. For a second intentional program violation, for one year.

3. For a third intentional program violation, permanently.

Under the bill, an intentional program violation is defined as making a false or

misleading statement, intentionally misrepresenting or withholding facts, or

committing any act that constitutes a violation of state or federal law for the purpose

of using, presenting, transferring, acquiring, receiving, possessing, or trafficking

public assistance benefits. The bill also specifies that DCF, a W-2 agency, or an entity

administering Wisconsin Shares determines whether an individual has committed

an intentional program violation for purposes of denying benefits.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: A. Ott (R) , Ballweg (R) , Endsley (R) , J. Ott (R) , Jacque (R) , Kerkman (R) , Kestell (R) , Knodl (R) , Knudson (R) , Krug (R) , Marklein (R) , Pridemore (R) , Rivard (R) , Spanbauer (R) , Steineke (R) , Strachota (R) , T. Larson (R) , Thiesfeldt (R) , Van Roy (R) , Vos (R) , Wynn (R) , Ziegelbauer (I)

2 cosponsors

Darling (R) , Lazich (R)

Votes

Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Children and Families, Ayes 7, Noes 0

Passed 7–0 Mar 2, 2012 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Feb 7, 2012 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Krug, Knodl, Ballweg, Endsley, Jacque, Kerkman, Kestell, Knudson, T. Larson, Marklein, A. Ott, Pridemore, Spanbauer, Steineke, Strachota, Thiesfeldt, Van Roy, Vos, Wynn, Ziegelbauer, J. Ott and Rivard;Cosponsored by Senators Darling and Lazich

  2. Feb 7, 2012 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Children and Families

  3. Feb 7, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Krug

  4. Feb 8, 2012 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Feb 8, 2012 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  6. Feb 17, 2012 · Assembly

    LRB correction

  7. Feb 22, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Krug

  8. Feb 22, 2012 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  9. Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Children and Families, Ayes 4, Noes 3

  10. Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  11. Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 3-6-2012 by committee on Rules

  12. Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Children and Families, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  13. Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by committee on Children and Families, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  14. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 3 offered by Representatives Molepske Jr and Vruwink

  15. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 4 offered by Representative Molepske Jr

  16. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:23 A.M. on 3-13-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22

  17. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 5 offered by Representative Molepske Jr

  18. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 6 offered by Representative Molepske Jr

  19. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 7 offered by Representative Berceau

  20. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 8 offered by Representative Berceau

  21. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  22. Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1