Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
exception to local levy limits for the village of Warrens.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Generally under current law, and subject to a number of exceptions, a city,
village, town, or county (political subdivision) may not increase its levy by a
percentage that exceeds its "valuation factor," which is defined as the greater of
either zero percent or the percentage change in the political subdivision's equalized
value due to new construction, less improvements removed. The base amount of a
political subdivision's levy, on which the levy limit is imposed, is the actual levy for
the immediately preceding year.
In 2011, the Department of Revenue (DOR) undervalued a tax incremental
district in the village of Warrens. Under current law, if DOR makes an error in
determining the equalized value in any county or taxation district, DOR corrects the
error by adjusting the taxation district's equalized value in the year after the year
in which DOR made the error. Because of the 2011 valuation error, should the village
impose its intended 2012 levy, the resulting tax rate would be higher than the village
intended. If the village reduces its levy and resulting tax rate, however, the levy will
be less than initially intended and the levy limit for 2013 would be based at the
reduced levy for 2012. Under this bill, the levy limits applicable to the village of
Warrens for 2013 are increased by the amount by which the village reduces its levy
from the amount it would have levied in 2012 if not for the valuation error to
compensate for that error. The actual levy limit increase amount is determined by
the Department of Revenue.
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 10, Noes 0
Passed 10–0 Feb 27, 2012 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Feb 7, 2012 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Radcliffe and Vruwink;Cosponsored by Senators Vinehout and Lassa
- Feb 7, 2012 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Ways and Means
- Feb 9, 2012 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Feb 17, 2012 · Assembly
LRB correction
- Feb 23, 2012 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Feb 27, 2012 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 10, Noes 0
- Feb 27, 2012 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 3-6-2012 by committee on Rules
- Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 11:24 A.M. on 3-13-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Laid on the table
- Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1