Skip to content

Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session

AB 535

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

exception to local levy limits for the village of Warrens.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Generally under current law, and subject to a number of exceptions, a city,

village, town, or county (political subdivision) may not increase its levy by a

percentage that exceeds its "valuation factor," which is defined as the greater of

either zero percent or the percentage change in the political subdivision's equalized

value due to new construction, less improvements removed. The base amount of a

political subdivision's levy, on which the levy limit is imposed, is the actual levy for

the immediately preceding year.

In 2011, the Department of Revenue (DOR) undervalued a tax incremental

district in the village of Warrens. Under current law, if DOR makes an error in

determining the equalized value in any county or taxation district, DOR corrects the

error by adjusting the taxation district's equalized value in the year after the year

in which DOR made the error. Because of the 2011 valuation error, should the village

impose its intended 2012 levy, the resulting tax rate would be higher than the village

intended. If the village reduces its levy and resulting tax rate, however, the levy will

be less than initially intended and the levy limit for 2013 would be based at the

reduced levy for 2012. Under this bill, the levy limits applicable to the village of

Warrens for 2013 are increased by the amount by which the village reduces its levy

from the amount it would have levied in 2012 if not for the valuation error to

compensate for that error. The actual levy limit increase amount is determined by

the Department of Revenue.

Sponsors

Introduced by: Radcliffe (D) , Vruwink (D)

2 cosponsors

Lassa (D) , Vinehout (D)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 10, Noes 0

Passed 10–0 Feb 27, 2012 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Feb 7, 2012 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Radcliffe and Vruwink;Cosponsored by Senators Vinehout and Lassa

  2. Feb 7, 2012 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Ways and Means

  3. Feb 9, 2012 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Feb 17, 2012 · Assembly

    LRB correction

  5. Feb 23, 2012 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Feb 27, 2012 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 10, Noes 0

  7. Feb 27, 2012 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  8. Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 3-6-2012 by committee on Rules

  9. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:24 A.M. on 3-13-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22

  10. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  11. Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1