Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
changes to product liability law and the law governing remedies against manufacturers, distributors, sellers, and promoters of a product.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
2011 Wisconsin Act 2
(Act 2) made a number of changes to the law governing
civil actions involving product liability claims brought under a theory of strict
liability and to civil actions against manufacturers, distributors, sellers, and
promoters of products. This bill makes several changes to certain provisions enacted
under Act 2.
Product liability
Requirements for bringing a product liability action based on a defective
product; defenses and exceptions to liability
Act 2 created specific requirements for bringing a product liability action
seeking damages under the theory of strict liability against manufacturers of the
product and against sellers and distributors of the product. Act 2 included defenses
and exceptions to strict liability for these types of parties. Finally, Act 2 included an
inapplicability provision making the requirements for bringing a product liability
action seeking damages under a theory of strict liability, the exceptions to strict
liability, and the defenses to strict liability inapplicable to actions based on a claim
of negligence or breach of warranty. This bill eliminates the inapplicability
provision.
RISK CONTRIBUTION THEORY: Remedies against
manufacturers, distributors, sellers, and promoters of
a product
Under Act 2, a manufacturer, distributor, seller, or promoter of a product who
is a defendant in a civil action generally may be held liable for damages only if an
injured party proves, in addition to causation, damages, and other elements of the
claim, that the specific product that caused the injury was manufactured,
distributed, sold, or promoted by the defendant. Also under Act 2, in cases in which
an injured party cannot prove that the defendant manufactured, distributed, sold or
promoted the specific product that caused the injury, the defendant may be held
liable under risk contribution theory if: 1) the injured party names as defendants in
the action those manufacturers who, collectively, during the relevant production
period, manufactured at least 80 percent of all products sold in this state that are
chemically identical to the specific product that allegedly caused the claimant's
injury and 2) the injured party proves certain other elements related to the cause of
the injury and the right of the injured party to a recovery. These provisions of Act
2 were made applicable to actions or special proceedings commenced on or after the
effective date of the Act.
This bill provides that the provisions of Act 2 governing remedies against
manufacturers, distributors, sellers, and promoters of a product apply to all actions
in law or equity, whenever filed or accrued. The bill includes a statement of
legislative findings and intent which states, in part, that the portions of Act 2
Sponsors
Introduced by: Kooyenga (R) , Vos (R)
2 cosponsors
Grothman (R) , S. Fitzgerald (R)
Full history
- Feb 7, 2012 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Kooyenga and Vos;Cosponsored by Senators Grothman and S. Fitzgerald
- Feb 7, 2012 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary and Ethics
- Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1