Skip to content

Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session

AB 548

Became law Official bill text Atom feed

the typeface used, and rates charged, for publication of legal notices.

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Assembly, completed
  3. Passes Senate, completed
  4. Governor signs, completed
  5. Law, completed

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, certain legal notices are required by statute or by an order

of a court to be published in a newspaper. Legal notices are generally published in

a newspaper likely to give notice in the area or to the person affected. Current law

sets standards for the publication of legal notices, including the type of newspaper

that may publish legal notices, a standard line length and type face for a legal notice,

and a minimum and maximum fee that a newspaper may charge for publication of

legal notices. Current law allows for different type faces to be used if the publisher

opts not to use the standard type face. Publication fees vary depending on the type

face used and whether the legal notice is being published for the first time or for a

second or subsequent time. Additionally, under current law, if the person requesting

publication submits a legal notice to a newspaper in a format that does not require

the newspaper to typeset or otherwise modify the legal notice, the fee for a second or

subsequent publication applies. The minimum and maximum fee is adjusted every

two years.

Under this bill, all legal notices must be published in Arial type face and a

standard line rate applies for all publications. The bill eliminates the minimum rate

and requires the standard line rate to be reviewed annually. In addition, under the

bill, any newspaper that publishes a legal notice must also place an electronic copy

of the legal notice, at no additional charge, on a Web site that is maintained by

Wisconsin newspapers for the purpose of maintaining an electronic version of

printed and published legal notices.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: A. Ott (R) , Doyle (D) , Endsley (R) , LeMahieu (R) , Marklein (R) , Molepske Jr (D) , Petryk (R) , Spanbauer (R) , Thiesfeldt (R)

5 cosponsors

Harsdorf (R) , Holperin (D) , Leibham (R) , Schultz (R) , Shilling (D)

Votes

Suspending the rules (to take a vote immediately) needs a two-thirds majority — a higher bar than passing the bill, which needs a simple majority. That's why a suspension motion can show more Ayes than the passage vote that follows it. Glossary

Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Homeland Security and State Affairs, Ayes 8, Noes 0

Passed 8–0 Feb 27, 2012 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Refused to suspend rules to read a third time, Ayes 61, Noes 36

Passed 61–36 Mar 6, 2012 official source full page

Aye · 61

Not voting · 2

Full history

  1. Feb 8, 2012 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Marklein, Doyle, Endsley, LeMahieu, A. Ott, Petryk, Spanbauer, Thiesfeldt and Molepske Jr;Cosponsored by Senators Leibham, Harsdorf, Holperin, Schultz and Shilling

  2. Feb 8, 2012 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Homeland Security and State Affairs

  3. Feb 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Feb 22, 2012 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Feb 27, 2012 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Homeland Security and State Affairs, Ayes 8, Noes 0

  7. Feb 27, 2012 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  8. Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 3-6-2012 by committee on Rules

  9. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Refused to suspend rules to read a third time, Ayes 61, Noes 36

  10. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:29 A.M. on 3-13-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22

  11. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  12. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  13. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  14. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  15. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  16. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  17. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  18. Mar 14, 2012 · Senate

    Rules suspended and taken up

  19. Mar 14, 2012 · Senate

    Read a second time

  20. Mar 14, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  21. Mar 14, 2012 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  22. Mar 14, 2012 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in

  23. Mar 14, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  24. Mar 14, 2012 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  25. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled

  26. Apr 5, 2012 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 4-5-2012

  27. Apr 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-6-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 228

  28. Apr 10, 2012 · Assembly

    Published 4-19-2012