Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Assembly Bill 548

The typeface used, and rates charged, for publication of legal notices

Topics: Data processing, Newspaper and magazine, Public document

Became law

The governor signed it on Apr 6, 2012. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 8, 2012

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Mar 13, 2012

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Mar 14, 2012

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2011 Wisconsin Act 228

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 10, 2012: “Published 4-19-2012”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, certain legal notices are required by statute or by an order of a court to be published in a newspaper. Legal notices are generally published in a newspaper likely to give notice in the area or to the person affected. Current law sets standards for the publication of legal notices, including the type of newspaper that may publish legal notices, a standard line length and type face for a legal notice, and a minimum and maximum fee that a newspaper may charge for publication of legal notices. Current law allows for different type faces to be used if the publisher opts not to use the standard type face. Publication fees vary depending on the type face used and whether the legal notice is being published for the first time or for a second or subsequent time. Additionally, under current law, if the person requesting publication submits a legal notice to a newspaper in a format that does not require the newspaper to typeset or otherwise modify the legal notice, the fee for a second or subsequent publication applies. The minimum and maximum fee is adjusted every two years.

Under this bill, all legal notices must be published in Arial type face and a standard line rate applies for all publications. The bill eliminates the minimum rate and requires the standard line rate to be reviewed annually. In addition, under the bill, any newspaper that publishes a legal notice must also place an electronic copy of the legal notice, at no additional charge, on a Web site that is maintained by Wisconsin newspapers for the purpose of maintaining an electronic version of printed and published legal notices.

Who's behind it

9 lawmakers are its ⁠. 7 are Republicans and 2 are Democrats.

5 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 14 names

Authors (9)

Signed on in support (5)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill. Taking a bill up right away needs two-thirds of the members, a higher bar than passing it, so that vote can draw more yeses than the final one.

Assembly Committee on Homeland Security and State Affairs vote to recommend it

Passed, 8 to 0 · Feb 27, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Homeland Security and State Affairs, Ayes 8, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to take it up right away

Passed, 61 to 36 · Mar 6, 2012 · 2 didn't vote

See how each of the 99 representatives voted

D: Democrat, I: Independent, R: Republican

Yes (61)

Didn't vote (2)

Official motion: “Refused to suspend rules to read a third time, Ayes 61, Noes 36”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 10, 2012

    The new law was published.

  2. Apr 6, 2012

    The governor signed it. It became 2011 Wisconsin Act 228.

  3. Apr 5, 2012

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Mar 14, 2012

    The Senate passed it too.

  5. Mar 13, 2012

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.

  6. Mar 13, 2012

    The Senate received it.

  7. Mar 13, 2012

    The Assembly passed it.

  8. Feb 27, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  9. Feb 27, 2012

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 8 to 0.

  10. Feb 16, 2012

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  11. Feb 15, 2012

    The committee held a public hearing.

  12. Feb 8, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Homeland Security and State Affairs.

  13. Feb 8, 2012

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 8, 2012 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Marklein, Doyle, Endsley, LeMahieu, A. Ott, Petryk, Spanbauer, Thiesfeldt and Molepske Jr;Cosponsored by Senators Leibham, Harsdorf, Holperin, Schultz and Shilling

  2. Feb 8, 2012 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Homeland Security and State Affairs

  3. Feb 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Feb 22, 2012 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Feb 27, 2012 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Homeland Security and State Affairs, Ayes 8, Noes 0

  7. Feb 27, 2012 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  8. Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 3-6-2012 by committee on Rules

  9. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  10. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  11. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Refused to suspend rules to read a third time, Ayes 61, Noes 36

  12. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:29 A.M. on 3-13-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22

  13. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  14. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  15. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  16. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  17. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  18. Mar 14, 2012 · Senate

    Rules suspended and taken up

  19. Mar 14, 2012 · Senate

    Read a second time

  20. Mar 14, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  21. Mar 14, 2012 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  22. Mar 14, 2012 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in

  23. Mar 14, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  24. Mar 14, 2012 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  25. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled

  26. Apr 5, 2012 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 4-5-2012

  27. Apr 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-6-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 228

  28. Apr 10, 2012 · Assembly

    Published 4-19-2012

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote