Skip to content

Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session

AB 558

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

the governor's read to lead development fund, the Read to Lead Development Council, grants in support of literacy and early childhood development programs, teacher licensure, screening kindergarten pupils for reading readiness, remedial reading services for certain pupils, evaluating teacher preparatory programs and educator effectiveness, requiring the exercise of rule-making authority, and making an appropriation.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Read to lead

This bill creates the Read to Lead Development Council in the Office of the

Governor. The council consists of the governor, the state superintendent of public

instruction, four legislators, and 15 additional members appointed by the governor.

The bill creates a segregated fund, designated the governor's read to lead

development fund, consisting of all contributions made to the fund. The bill

appropriates moneys in the fund to the governor and to the state superintendent to

award grants in support of literacy and early childhood development programs. The

governor may award a grant to any person other than a school board. The state

superintendent may award a grant only to a school board. The governor and the state

superintendent jointly determine the amount of each grant. The bill directs the Read

to Lead Development Council to advise the governor and state superintendent on

grant recipients.

Assessments of reading readiness

This bill directs each school board and each independent charter school

annually to assess all pupils in five-year-old kindergarten programs for reading

readiness. If the Department of Public Instruction (DPI) determines that sufficient

moneys are available, the school board and the charter school must also assess all

pupils in four-year-old kindergarten programs. The school board and charter school

must use an assessment selected by DPI. The school board and charter school must

provide a pupil whose assessment indicates that he or she is at risk of reading

difficulty with remedial reading services. The bill appropriates moneys to DPI to

provide school districts and independent charter schools with the assessments.

Teacher licensure

Beginning January 1, 2014, the bill prohibits DPI from issuing an initial

teaching license that authorizes the holder to teach in grades kindergarten to five

or in special education unless the applicant has passed an examination that tests the

applicant's knowledge of specified facets of reading development and reading

instruction. The bill provides that any teacher who passes the examination must

notify DPI in order to have a notation added to the teacher's license indicating that

he or she passed the examination.

Teacher preparatory programs

Under current law, DPI establishes standards and requirements for and

approves education programs leading to licensure as a teacher, including programs

leading to licensure as an alternative education program teacher. This bill requires

each teacher education program located in this state to, beginning on July 1, 2012,

and annually thereafter, provide DPI with a list of graduates, and their graduation

dates, from each term or semester of the program's most recently completed

academic year. The bill requires DPI to include this information about graduates of

teacher education programs in the statewide student information system.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Ballweg (R) , Brooks (R) , Endsley (R) , Kestell (R) , Marklein (R) , Spanbauer (R)

3 cosponsors

Darling (R) , Olsen (R) , Schultz (R)

Votes

Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 7, Noes 4

Passed 7–4 Feb 27, 2012 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 7, Noes 4

Passed 7–4 Feb 27, 2012 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Feb 10, 2012 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Kestell, Marklein, Ballweg, Brooks, Endsley and Spanbauer;Cosponsored by Senators Olsen, Darling and Schultz

  2. Feb 10, 2012 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Education

  3. Feb 14, 2012 · Assembly

    LRB correction

  4. Feb 14, 2012 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Feb 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  6. Feb 22, 2012 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  7. Feb 22, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by committee on Education

  8. Feb 22, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by committee on Education

  9. Feb 27, 2012 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 6, Noes 5

  10. Feb 27, 2012 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  11. Feb 27, 2012 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 7, Noes 4

  12. Feb 27, 2012 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 7, Noes 4

  13. Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 3-6-2012 by committee on Rules

  14. Mar 5, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Kestell

  15. Mar 5, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Pope-Roberts

  16. Mar 5, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 3 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Pope-Roberts

  17. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 4 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representatives Krusick and Fields

  18. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 4 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representatives Krusick and Fields

  19. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 2 offered by Representative Pope-Roberts

  20. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:32 A.M. on 3-13-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22

  21. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 to Assembly amendment 4 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representatives Krusick and Fields

  22. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 3 to Assembly amendment 4 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Krusick

  23. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representatives Mason, Turner and Barca

  24. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  25. Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1