Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
limiting the authority of a city, village, or town to enact a development moratorium ordinance.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, a county board may engage in zoning and land use planning
by creating a county planning agency or by designating a previously constituted
county committee or commission as the county planning agency. If a county board
creates or designates such an agency, the agency is required to direct the preparation
of a county development plan for the physical development of the towns within the
county and for the cities and villages within the county whose governing bodies agree
to have their areas included in the county plan.
Also under current law, a city or village, or certain towns that exercise village
powers, may create a city, village, or town plan commission to engage in zoning and
land use planning. If a city, village, or town creates such a commission, the
commission is required to adopt a master plan for the physical development of the
city, village, or town, including in some instances, in the case of a city or village,
unincorporated areas outside of the city or village that are related to the city's or
village's development.
Under the current law commonly known as the "Smart Growth" statute, if a
city, village, town, county, or regional planning commission creates a development
plan or master plan (comprehensive plan) or amends an existing comprehensive
plan, the plan must contain certain planning elements. The required planning
elements include the following: housing; transportation; utilities and community
facilities; agricultural, natural, and cultural resources; economic development; land
use; and intergovernmental cooperation.
Subject to a number of limitations and conditions, this bill authorizes a city,
village, or town (municipality) to enact a development moratorium ordinance if the
municipality has enacted, is in the process of enacting or amending, or is exempt
from having to enact, a comprehensive plan. The municipality may enact a
development moratorium ordinance (moratorium) only if its governing body adopts
a resolution stating either that a moratorium is needed to prevent a shortage in or
the overburdening of its public facilities or that a moratorium is needed to address
a significant threat to the public health or safety. In either case, the municipality
must obtain a written report from a professional engineer stating that the possible
effect on public facilities, or the possible threat to public health or safety, justifies the
need for a moratorium. In the case of a possible health or safety threat, the report
may also be from a physician or registered nurse.
The moratorium must contain a number of elements, including a statement
describing the problem giving rise to the need for the moratorium, the actions the
municipality intends to take to address the problem, and the length of time the
moratorium will apply. The moratorium may remain in effect only until the
municipality addresses the problem giving rise to the need for the moratorium, or for
12 months, whichever occurs first. The bill also authorizes the municipality to
extend the moratorium for another six months if the problem is not addressed. In
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Housing, Ayes 8, Noes 0
Passed 8–0 Mar 9, 2012 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Feb 13, 2012 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Steineke, Jacque, LeMahieu and Stroebel
- Feb 13, 2012 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Housing
- Feb 15, 2012 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 28, 2012 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Steineke
- Mar 7, 2012 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Mar 9, 2012 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Housing, Ayes 8, Noes 0
- Mar 9, 2012 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Housing, Ayes 7, Noes 1
- Mar 9, 2012 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1