Skip to content

Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session

AB 562

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

limiting the authority of a city, village, or town to enact a development moratorium ordinance.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, a county board may engage in zoning and land use planning

by creating a county planning agency or by designating a previously constituted

county committee or commission as the county planning agency. If a county board

creates or designates such an agency, the agency is required to direct the preparation

of a county development plan for the physical development of the towns within the

county and for the cities and villages within the county whose governing bodies agree

to have their areas included in the county plan.

Also under current law, a city or village, or certain towns that exercise village

powers, may create a city, village, or town plan commission to engage in zoning and

land use planning. If a city, village, or town creates such a commission, the

commission is required to adopt a master plan for the physical development of the

city, village, or town, including in some instances, in the case of a city or village,

unincorporated areas outside of the city or village that are related to the city's or

village's development.

Under the current law commonly known as the "Smart Growth" statute, if a

city, village, town, county, or regional planning commission creates a development

plan or master plan (comprehensive plan) or amends an existing comprehensive

plan, the plan must contain certain planning elements. The required planning

elements include the following: housing; transportation; utilities and community

facilities; agricultural, natural, and cultural resources; economic development; land

use; and intergovernmental cooperation.

Subject to a number of limitations and conditions, this bill authorizes a city,

village, or town (municipality) to enact a development moratorium ordinance if the

municipality has enacted, is in the process of enacting or amending, or is exempt

from having to enact, a comprehensive plan. The municipality may enact a

development moratorium ordinance (moratorium) only if its governing body adopts

a resolution stating either that a moratorium is needed to prevent a shortage in or

the overburdening of its public facilities or that a moratorium is needed to address

a significant threat to the public health or safety. In either case, the municipality

must obtain a written report from a professional engineer stating that the possible

effect on public facilities, or the possible threat to public health or safety, justifies the

need for a moratorium. In the case of a possible health or safety threat, the report

may also be from a physician or registered nurse.

The moratorium must contain a number of elements, including a statement

describing the problem giving rise to the need for the moratorium, the actions the

municipality intends to take to address the problem, and the length of time the

moratorium will apply. The moratorium may remain in effect only until the

municipality addresses the problem giving rise to the need for the moratorium, or for

12 months, whichever occurs first. The bill also authorizes the municipality to

extend the moratorium for another six months if the problem is not addressed. In

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Jacque (R) , LeMahieu (R) , Steineke (R) , Stroebel (R)

Votes

Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Housing, Ayes 8, Noes 0

Passed 8–0 Mar 9, 2012 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Feb 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Steineke, Jacque, LeMahieu and Stroebel

  2. Feb 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Housing

  3. Feb 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Feb 28, 2012 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Steineke

  7. Mar 7, 2012 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  8. Mar 9, 2012 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Housing, Ayes 8, Noes 0

  9. Mar 9, 2012 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Housing, Ayes 7, Noes 1

  10. Mar 9, 2012 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  11. Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1