Assembly Bill 57
Certain controlled substances and providing a penalty
Topics: Crime and criminals: Felony, Drugs, Legislature: Criminal Penalties, Joint Review Committee on, Municipality: Ordinance
Stopped before the full Assembly voted
The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.
-
Introduced, passed
Mar 21, 2011
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, stopped here
Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.
-
Senate vote, not reached
-
Governor, not reached
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Failed to pass pursuant to ”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Current law prohibits the manufacture, distribution, delivery, or possession of substances included in the schedule of controlled substances. Current law categorizes substances into five schedules, depending on the nature of the substance.
Schedule I substances are those that have a high potential for abuse, have no currently accepted medical use, and are not accepted as safe for use in treatment under medical supervision.
Read the full summary Show less
This bill identifies several nonnarcotic, hallucinogenic substances that are commonly known as "synthetic cannabinoids" and classifies those substances as Schedule I controlled substances. The bill also identifies two stimulant substances and classifies those as Schedule I controlled substances.
Under the bill, a person who possesses a synthetic cannabinoid may, for a first offense, be fined up to $1,000, imprisoned for up to six months, or both. For a second or subsequent offense, the person is guilty of a Class I felony and may be fined up to $10,000, imprisoned for up to three years and six months, or both. A person who manufactures, distributes, or delivers a synthetic cannabinoid, or who possesses a synthetic cannabinoid with the intent to manufacture, distribute, or deliver it, is guilty of a Class H felony and subject to a fine up to $10,000, imprisonment for up to six years, or both. The bill also enables a town, city, village, or county to pass an ordinance that provides a forfeiture for a first violation of possession of a synthetic cannabinoid.
Under the bill, a person who possesses either of the stimulant substances may, for a first offense, be fined up to $5,000, imprisoned for up to one year, or both. For a second or subsequent offense, the person is guilty of a Class I felony and may be fined up to $10,000, imprisoned for up to three years and six months, or both. A person who manufactures, distributes, or delivers either of the stimulant substances, or who possesses either of the stimulant substances with the intent to manufacture, distribute, or deliver it, is guilty of a felony, the classification of which depends on the amount of the controlled substance involved in the offense.
Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime, the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a report concerning the proposed penalty and the costs or savings that are likely to result if the bill is enacted.
Who's behind it
21 lawmakers are its . 17 are Republicans and 4 are Democrats.
10 more lawmakers .
See all 31 names Hide the names
Authors (21)
- Penny Bernard Schaber · Democrat, Assembly
- Garey Bies · Republican, Assembly
- Edward Brooks · Republican, Assembly
- Andy Jorgensen · Democrat, Assembly
- Dean Kaufert · Republican, Assembly
- Samantha Kerkman · Republican, Assembly
- Joel Kleefisch · Republican, Assembly
- Joe Knilans · Republican, Assembly
- Cory Mason · Democrat, Assembly
- Dan Meyer · Republican, Assembly
- Jeff Mursau · Republican, Assembly
- Steve Nass · Republican, Senate
- Kevin Petersen · Republican, Assembly
- Roger Rivard · Republican, Assembly
- Erik Severson · Republican, Assembly
- Christine Sinicki · Democrat, Assembly
- Richard Spanbauer · Republican, Assembly
- Jim Steineke · Republican, Assembly
- Pat Strachota · Republican, Assembly
- Jeremy Thiesfeldt · Republican, Assembly
- Evan Wynn · Republican, Assembly
Signed on in support (10)
- Alberta Darling · Republican, Senate
- Sheila Harsdorf · Republican, Senate
- Jim Holperin · Democrat, Senate
- André Jacque · Republican, Senate
- Robert Jauch · Democrat, Senate
- Neal Kedzie · Republican, Senate
- Julie M. Lassa · Democrat, Senate
- Luther S. Olsen · Republican, Senate
- Dale Schultz · Republican, Senate
- Van Wanggaard · Republican, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
How lawmakers voted
There was one vote on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Criminal Justice and Corrections vote to recommend it
Passed, 8 to 0 · May 25, 2011
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Criminal Justice and Corrections, Ayes 8, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Mar 23, 2012
The session ended, and the bill died with it.
-
May 25, 2011
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
May 25, 2011
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 8 to 0.
-
May 5, 2011
1 more senator signed on in support.
-
Apr 29, 2011
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Apr 21, 2011
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Mar 30, 2011
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Mar 29, 2011
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Mar 28, 2011
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Mar 24, 2011
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Mar 21, 2011
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Criminal Justice and Corrections.
-
Mar 21, 2011
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Mar 21, 2011 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Bies, Knilans, Kleefisch, Jorgensen, Bernard Schaber, Brooks, Kaufert, Kerkman, Mason, Meyer, Mursau, Nass, Petersen, Sinicki, Spanbauer, Steineke, Strachota, Thiesfeldt, Wynn, Rivard and Severson;Cosponsored by Senators Harsdorf, Jauch, Holperin, Lassa, Olsen, Schultz, Darling and Wanggaard
- Mar 21, 2011 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Criminal Justice and Corrections
- Mar 24, 2011 · Assembly
Representative Jacque added as a coauthor
- Mar 28, 2011 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 29, 2011 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 30, 2011 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 21, 2011 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Apr 29, 2011 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- May 5, 2011 · Assembly
Senator Kedzie added as a cosponsor
- May 12, 2011 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- May 25, 2011 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by committee on Criminal Justice and Corrections, Ayes 8, Noes 0
- May 25, 2011 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Jun 2, 2011 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 6-8-2011 by committee on Rules
- Jun 8, 2011 · Assembly
Laid on the table
- Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote