Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Assembly Bill 582

Regulation of rental-purchase agreements and granting rule-making authority

Topics: Consumer protection, Financial Institutions, Department of, Lease

Passed the Assembly, then stopped

The Assembly passed it on Mar 15, 2012, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to ⁠. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 17, 2012

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Mar 15, 2012

  4. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, a consumer credit transaction that is entered into for personal, family, or household purposes is generally subject to the Wisconsin Consumer Act (consumer act). The consumer act grants consumers certain rights and remedies and contains notice and disclosure requirements and prohibitions relating to consumer credit transactions. Currently, a consumer lease that has a term of more than four months is among the consumer credit transactions that are subject to the consumer act. In addition, the consumer act applies to any other consumer lease, if the lessee pays or agrees to pay at least an amount that is substantially equal to the value of the leased property and if the lessee will become, or for not more than a nominal additional payment has the option to become, the owner of the leased property.

This bill creates requirements that specifically apply to rental-purchase agreements, imposes requirements on rental-purchase companies, and exempts rental-purchase companies and rental-purchase agreements from the scope of the consumer act and from provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code relating to security interests. The bill defines a "rental-purchase agreement" as an agreement between a rental-purchase company and a lessee for the use of rental property if all of the following apply: 1) the rental property is to be used primarily for personal, family, or household purposes; 2) the agreement has an initial term of four months or less and is renewable with each payment after the initial term; 3) the agreement does not obligate or require the lessee to renew the agreement beyond the initial term; and 4) the agreement permits, but does not obligate, the lessee to acquire ownership of the rental property. A "rental-purchase company" is defined as a person engaged in the business of entering into rental-purchase agreements in this state or acquiring rental-purchase agreements that are entered into in this state.

Read the full summary

The bill requires a rental-purchase company to file notice with the Department of Financial Institutions (DFI) within 30 days after commencing business in this state. A separate notice is required for each place of business maintained by the rental-purchase company. In addition, the rental-purchase company must pay to DFI an annual fee of $1,000 for each location for which a notice is filed.

Under the bill, the total amount charged by a rental-purchase company for all required charges or fees, excluding applicable taxes and any late fees or reinstatement fees, in a rental-purchase transaction may not exceed twice the maximum cash price of the rental property. The maximum cash price of rental property may not exceed the greater of the following: 1) an amount equal to twice the actual purchase price of the rental property, including any applicable freight charges, paid by the rental-purchase company; or 2) the price at which property of like type and quality is offered, in the ordinary course of business, for sale for cash in the market area of the rental-purchase store where the property is offered for rental purchase. The bill also limits the maximum amount that a lessee must pay to acquire ownership of the property if the lessee elects an early-purchase option after the initial rental period. This maximum amount to acquire ownership under an early-purchase option is the greater of the following: 1) an amount not to exceed 55 percent of the difference between the total of rental payments necessary to acquire ownership of the rental property and the total amount of rental payments paid for use of the rental property at that time, plus applicable taxes; or 2) the amount of one rental payment. Before a lessee acquires ownership of the rental property under an early-purchase option, the rental-purchase company may require the lessee to pay any accrued unpaid rental payments and fees.

The bill specifies that a rental-purchase company must not disclose, in a rental-purchase agreement or otherwise, any percentage rate calculation, including an annual percentage rate.

Under the bill, a lessee may reinstate a rental-purchase agreement that has ended without losing any rights or options previously acquired if all of the following apply: 1) the lessee voluntarily returned or surrendered the rental property within seven days after the expiration of the rental-purchase agreement; and 2) not more than 120 days have passed after the date on which the rental-purchase agreement ended. As a condition of reinstatement, the rental-purchase company may require the payment of all past-due rental charges, any applicable late fees, a reinstatement fee not to exceed $5, and the rental payment for the next term. Upon reinstatement, the rental-purchase company must provide the lessee with the same rental property or with substitute property of comparable quality and condition. A rental-purchase company must provide written notice to a lessee of the lessee's rights and obligations relating to reinstatement of the rental-purchase agreement within 15 days of repossession or voluntary return or surrender of the rental property, if the lessee is entitled to reinstatement.

Under the bill, a rental-purchase company that violates any of these provisions, or any applicable rule or order of DFI, pertaining to a lessee is liable to the lessee in an amount equal to the greater of the following: 1) the actual damages sustained by the lessee as a result of the violation; 2) if the action is not brought as a class action, 25 percent of the total payments necessary for the lessee to acquire ownership of the rental property, but not less than $100 nor more than $1,000; or 3) if the action is brought as a class action, the amount the court determines to be appropriate. However, there are two limitations on such an award of damages. First, a rental-purchase company is not liable for any violation if the rental-purchase company shows by a preponderance of the evidence that the violation was not intentional and resulted from a bona fide error, and the rental-purchase company maintained procedures reasonably adapted to avoid such an error. Second, in a class action or series of class actions, the total recovery by all lessees arising out of the same violation may not be more than the lesser of $500,000 or 1 percent of the net worth of the rental-purchase company. If a court awards any monetary amount of damages to a lessee, the rental-purchase company is also liable to the lessee for the costs of the action and reasonable attorney fees.

The bill allows DFI to promulgate rules relating to rental-purchase company disclosure requirements and requirements for rental-purchase companies to maintain records and make reports to DFI. The bill also requires DFI to administer and enforce the provisions of the bill.

Who's behind it

5 lawmakers are its ⁠. All 5 are Republicans.

1 more lawmaker ⁠.

See all 6 names

Authors (5)

Signed on in support (1)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 8 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Financial Institutions vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 4 · Mar 2, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Financial Institutions, Ayes 5, Noes 4”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote

Failed, 38 to 52 · Mar 15, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Refused to refer to committee on Financial Institutions, Ayes 38, Noes 52”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 56 to 36 · Mar 15, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 56, Noes 36”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 54 to 38 · Mar 15, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 2 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 54, Noes 38”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 56 to 36 · Mar 15, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 3 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 56, Noes 36”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 56 to 36 · Mar 15, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 5 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 56, Noes 36”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 56 to 36 · Mar 15, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 6 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 56, Noes 36”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 52 to 39 · Mar 15, 2012 · 6 didn't vote

See how each of the 97 representatives voted

D: Democrat, I: Independent, R: Republican

Yes (52)

No (39)

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 52, Noes 39, Paired 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2012

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Mar 15, 2012

    The Assembly passed it, 52 to 39.

  3. Mar 15, 2012

    The Assembly adopted it.

  4. Mar 14, 2012

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.

  5. Mar 14, 2012

    The Senate received it.

  6. Mar 6, 2012

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  7. Mar 2, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  8. Mar 2, 2012

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 4.

  9. Mar 2, 2012

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  10. Feb 28, 2012

    The committee held a public hearing.

  11. Feb 17, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Financial Institutions.

  12. Feb 17, 2012

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 17, 2012 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Petryk, Bernier, Litjens, Stone and Suder;Cosponsored by Senator Moulton

  2. Feb 17, 2012 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Financial Institutions

  3. Feb 28, 2012 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Feb 28, 2012 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  5. Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Financial Institutions, Ayes 5, Noes 4

  7. Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  8. Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 3-6-2012 by committee on Rules

  9. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  10. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  11. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representatives Kramer, Petryk, Kerkman, Suder and Danou

  12. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Hintz

  13. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 3 offered by Representative Hintz

  14. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 4 offered by Representative Hintz

  15. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:34 A.M. on 3-13-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22

  16. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Petryk

  17. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Hintz

  18. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Hintz

  19. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 3 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Hintz

  20. Mar 14, 2012 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  21. Mar 14, 2012 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  22. Mar 14, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  23. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  24. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Refused to refer to committee on Financial Institutions, Ayes 38, Noes 52

  25. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 56, Noes 36

  26. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 54, Noes 38

  27. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 3 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 56, Noes 36

  28. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 4 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Hintz

  29. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 4 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 withdrawn and returned to author

  30. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 5 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Hintz

  31. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 5 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 56, Noes 36

  32. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 6 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Hintz

  33. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 6 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 56, Noes 36

  34. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 7 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Hintz

  35. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 7 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 withdrawn and returned to author

  36. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 adopted

  37. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  38. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  39. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 52, Noes 39, Paired 2

  40. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  41. Mar 23, 2012 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote