Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
certain shoreland zoning standards and ordinances that regulate the repair and expansion of nonconforming structures.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, a county must enact a shoreland zoning ordinance for all
shorelands in its unincorporated area and the ordinance must meet shoreland
zoning standards established by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) by
rule. Current law defines a shoreland to be an area within a certain distance from
the edge of a navigable water. Current law also specifies that, if a shoreland area is
annexed by a city or village (annexing municipality) or is part of a town that
incorporates as a city or village (incorporated municipality), then, with certain
exceptions, the county shoreland zoning ordinance continues in effect and must be
enforced by the annexing or incorporated municipality. The exceptions in current
law allow the annexing or incorporated municipality to enforce its own zoning
ordinance with respect to shorelands if the ordinance complies with shoreland
zoning standards that are at least as restrictive as the county shoreland zoning
ordinance.
This bill prohibits a county from enacting, and prohibits a county, city, or village
from enforcing, any provision in a county shoreland zoning ordinance that regulates
the use, location, maintenance, expansion, replacement, or relocation of a
nonconforming structure if that provision is more restrictive than the shoreland
zoning standards for nonconforming structures promulgated by DNR. The
prohibition under the bill also applies to a shoreland zoning ordinance enacted by an
annexing or incorporated municipality. The bill defines a nonconforming structure
as a dwelling or building that does not conform with a county shoreland zoning
ordinance, other than an ordinance regulating a nonconforming use, but that
lawfully existed before the county shoreland zoning ordinance was enacted.
The bill also provides that DNR may not establish a shoreland zoning standard,
and a county may not enact or enforce a shoreland zoning ordinance, that prohibits
the construction of a structure or building on certain lots, parcels, or tracts (lots).
Under the bill, a shoreland zoning standard or ordinance may not prohibit the
construction of a structure or a building on a lot that does not meet minimum area
and width requirements if the lot met those requirements when the lot was originally
created or if there was no shoreland zoning standard or ordinance in effect that
established minimum area and width requirements when the lot was originally
created.
Generally under current law, zoning restrictions that would otherwise apply to
a damaged or destroyed nonconforming structure may not prohibit, subject to a
number of conditions, the restoration of the structure if it will be restored to the size,
location, and use it had before the damage or destruction occurred, unless the size
must be larger to comply with state or federal requirements. In addition, and subject
to the same conditions, the restrictions in the zoning ordinance may not impose
limits on the costs of the repair, reconstruction, or improvement of the structure. The
conditions that apply to the restrictions in the zoning ordinance are as follows:
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by committee on Housing, Ayes 8, Noes 0
Passed 8–0 Mar 9, 2012 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Feb 20, 2012 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Tiffany, Murtha, Litjens, Rivard, Jacque and Steineke
- Feb 20, 2012 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Natural Resources
- Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly
Withdrawn from committee on Natural Resources and referred to committee on Housing
- Feb 29, 2012 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 29, 2012 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Tiffany
- Mar 5, 2012 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Tiffany
- Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 7, 2012 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Mar 9, 2012 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Housing, Ayes 7, Noes 1
- Mar 9, 2012 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Mar 9, 2012 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by committee on Housing, Ayes 8, Noes 0
- Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1