Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Assembly Bill 597

Certain shoreland zoning standards and ordinances that regulate the repair and expansion of nonconforming structures

Topics: Natural Resources, Department of: Administration, Shoreland zoning

Stopped before the full Assembly voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 20, 2012

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, a county must enact a shoreland zoning ordinance for all shorelands in its unincorporated area and the ordinance must meet shoreland zoning standards established by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) by rule. Current law defines a shoreland to be an area within a certain distance from the edge of a navigable water. Current law also specifies that, if a shoreland area is annexed by a city or village (annexing municipality) or is part of a town that incorporates as a city or village (incorporated municipality), then, with certain exceptions, the county shoreland zoning ordinance continues in effect and must be enforced by the annexing or incorporated municipality. The exceptions in current law allow the annexing or incorporated municipality to enforce its own zoning ordinance with respect to shorelands if the ordinance complies with shoreland zoning standards that are at least as restrictive as the county shoreland zoning ordinance.

This bill prohibits a county from enacting, and prohibits a county, city, or village from enforcing, any provision in a county shoreland zoning ordinance that regulates the use, location, maintenance, expansion, replacement, or relocation of a nonconforming structure if that provision is more restrictive than the shoreland zoning standards for nonconforming structures promulgated by DNR. The prohibition under the bill also applies to a shoreland zoning ordinance enacted by an annexing or incorporated municipality. The bill defines a nonconforming structure as a dwelling or building that does not conform with a county shoreland zoning ordinance, other than an ordinance regulating a nonconforming use, but that lawfully existed before the county shoreland zoning ordinance was enacted.

Read the full summary

The bill also provides that DNR may not establish a shoreland zoning standard, and a county may not enact or enforce a shoreland zoning ordinance, that prohibits the construction of a structure or building on certain lots, parcels, or tracts (lots).

Under the bill, a shoreland zoning standard or ordinance may not prohibit the construction of a structure or a building on a lot that does not meet minimum area and width requirements if the lot met those requirements when the lot was originally created or if there was no shoreland zoning standard or ordinance in effect that established minimum area and width requirements when the lot was originally created.

Generally under current law, zoning restrictions that would otherwise apply to a damaged or destroyed nonconforming structure may not prohibit, subject to a number of conditions, the restoration of the structure if it will be restored to the size, location, and use it had before the damage or destruction occurred, unless the size must be larger to comply with state or federal requirements. In addition, and subject to the same conditions, the restrictions in the zoning ordinance may not impose limits on the costs of the repair, reconstruction, or improvement of the structure. The conditions that apply to the restrictions in the zoning ordinance are as follows:

1. The structure must have been damaged or destroyed after March 1, 2006.

2. The structure must have been damaged or destroyed by violent wind, vandalism, fire, flood, ice, snow, mold, or infestation.

Under this bill, a zoning ordinance may not prohibit, or limit based on cost, the repair, maintenance, reconstruction, renovation, or remodeling of a nonconforming structure in existence on the effective date of a zoning ordinance that relates to that structure.

Who's behind it

6 lawmakers are its ⁠. All 6 are Republicans.

See all 6 names

Authors (6)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Housing vote on an amendment

Passed, 8 to 0 · Mar 9, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by committee on Housing, Ayes 8, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2012

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Mar 9, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  3. Mar 9, 2012

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 1.

  4. Mar 6, 2012

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  5. Mar 5, 2012

    The committee held a public hearing.

  6. Feb 29, 2012

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  7. Feb 21, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Housing.

  8. Feb 20, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Natural Resources.

  9. Feb 20, 2012

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 20, 2012 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Tiffany, Murtha, Litjens, Rivard, Jacque and Steineke

  2. Feb 20, 2012 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Natural Resources

  3. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Withdrawn from committee on Natural Resources and referred to committee on Housing

  4. Feb 29, 2012 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Feb 29, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Tiffany

  6. Mar 5, 2012 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  7. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Tiffany

  8. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  9. Mar 7, 2012 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  10. Mar 9, 2012 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by committee on Housing, Ayes 8, Noes 0

  11. Mar 9, 2012 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Housing, Ayes 7, Noes 1

  12. Mar 9, 2012 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  13. Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote