Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Assembly Bill 621

Attempts to influence action upon model or similar proposed legislation, prohibiting the expending of certain moneys by members of the legislature, and reporting by certain persons providing or state public officials receiving certain things of value for scholarship purposes

Topics: Ethics, Government Accountability Board, Legislature: Criminal Penalties, Joint Review Committee on, Legislature: Member, Lobbying, Public officers, Uniform legislation

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 23, 2012

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Assembly vote, not reached

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Assembly Committee on Assembly Organization. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Currently, with certain exceptions, a principal (person who employs a lobbyist) must register and file semiannual itemized expense statements with the Government Accountability Board (GAB). A lobbyist is a person who is retained by a principal and whose duties include attempting to influence state legislative action or rule making by oral or written communication, on behalf of the principal, with an elective state official, agency official, or legislative employee in this state.

Subject to the current exceptions, this bill requires registration and the filing of expense statements, in addition, by a principal who attempts to influence the development, drafting, consideration, modification, adoption, rejection, or defeat of uniform, model, suggested, or recommended legislation for consideration by the legislatures of this state and other states by oral or written communication with any person who is a member, employee, or agent of a body that proposes uniform, model, suggested, or recommended legislation for consideration by the legislatures of this state and other states. Violators are subject to a forfeiture (civil penalty) of not more than $5,000 for each violation. A principal filing a statement that the principal does not believe is true is guilty of a felony and may be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned for not more than six years, or both.

Read the full summary

Currently, with certain exceptions, each state public official who is required to file an annual statement of economic interests with GAB and who receives for a published work or for the presentation of a talk or participation in a meeting, any thing of pecuniary value exceeding a total of $50, excluding the value of food or beverages offered coincidentally with a talk or meeting, must report, on his or her statement, the identity of every person from whom the official receives the thing of value, the circumstances under which it is received, and the approximate value thereof.

The bill specifically extends this reporting requirement to each state public official who is required to file statements of economic interests and who receives for attendance at a meeting or conference any thing of pecuniary value for scholarship purposes and requires statements concerning things of value received to indicate whether a thing of value was received for scholarship purposes.

The bill also requires each person who provides any thing of value to a member of the legislature for scholarship purposes to file a report with GAB, in the manner and form specified by GAB, within 90 days after the thing of value is provided, disclosing the name of each member who received the thing of value together with the name of any legislative employee or state agency official who received any thing of value in connection with the same transaction or occurrence, the date that the thing of value was provided, and the names of any persons who contributed money to the person for the purpose of providing the thing of value within the 12-month period preceding the date on which the thing of value is provided. Currently, there is no similar requirement.

Violators of either of the above reporting requirements are subject to a forfeiture of not more than $500 for each violation. Intentional violators are guilty of a misdemeanor and are subject to a fine of not less than $100 nor more than $5,000 or imprisonment for not more than one year, or both.

Finally, the bill prohibits any member of the legislature from expending any moneys allocated for the operation of his or her office for membership fees in any organization that proposes uniform, model, suggested, or recommended legislation for consideration by the legislatures of this state and other states.

Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime, the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a report concerning the proposed penalty and the costs or savings that are likely to result if the bill is enacted.

Who's behind it

10 lawmakers are its ⁠. All 10 are Democrats.

5 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 15 names

Authors (10)

Signed on in support (5)

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2012

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Feb 23, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Assembly Organization.

  3. Feb 23, 2012

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 23, 2012 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Pocan, Berceau, Bernard Schaber, Grigsby, Jorgensen, Pasch, Pope-Roberts, Roys, Sinicki and C. Taylor;Cosponsored by Senators C. Larson, Risser, T. Cullen, Taylor and Lassa

  2. Feb 23, 2012 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Assembly Organization

  3. Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor