Skip to content

Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session

AB 627

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

trading of water pollution credits, granting rule-making authority, and making an appropriation.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Generally, under current law, a person may not discharge pollutants into the

waters of this state from a point source (such as a pipe) without a permit from the

Department of Natural Resources (DNR) that specifies limits on the discharge of

water pollutants. Current law requires DNR to administer at least one pilot project

to evaluate the trading of water pollution credits. Under a pilot project, a person who

is required to obtain a water pollution permit may be authorized to discharge more

pollutants than would otherwise be allowed if the person reaches an agreement

under which another person agrees to reduce the amount of water pollution that the

other person causes or if the person reaches an agreement to provide money that

DNR or a local government uses to reduce water pollution.

This bill requires DNR to administer a program, rather than at least one pilot

project, for the trading of water pollution credits. In addition to providing for

agreements as under current law, the bill provides that DNR may authorize a person

who is required to obtain two water pollution permits to discharge more pollutants

than would otherwise be allowed under one permit if the person agrees to reduce the

amount of water pollution below what would otherwise be allowed under the second

permit. The bill also provides that DNR may authorize a person to discharge more

pollutants than would otherwise be allowed if the person agrees to construct a project

or implement a plan that results in reducing water pollution from sources other than

the permitted source.

Under current law and under the bill, a water pollution credit trading

agreement is only allowed if it results in an improvement in water quality and if the

increase and the reduction involve the same pollutant or the same water quality

standard. Under current law, a water pollution trading project may only be

conducted within a project area that meets specified criteria. This bill eliminates the

requirement concerning a project area, but requires that the increase and the

reduction in pollution occur within the same water basin or portion of a water basin,

as determined by DNR. Under current law, the term of a water pollution trading

agreement may not exceed five years. This bill eliminates the restriction on the term

of an agreement. Both current law and the bill require that trading of water pollution

credits be conducted in accordance with the federal Water Pollution Control Act.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Endsley (R) , Knilans (R) , LeMahieu (R) , Spanbauer (R)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Natural Resources, Ayes 16, Noes 0

Passed 16–0 Mar 9, 2012 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Feb 24, 2012 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Knilans, Endsley, Spanbauer and LeMahieu

  2. Feb 24, 2012 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Natural Resources

  3. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Mar 7, 2012 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Mar 7, 2012 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Mar 9, 2012 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Natural Resources, Ayes 16, Noes 0

  7. Mar 9, 2012 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  8. Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1