Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
trading of water pollution credits, granting rule-making authority, and making an appropriation.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Generally, under current law, a person may not discharge pollutants into the
waters of this state from a point source (such as a pipe) without a permit from the
Department of Natural Resources (DNR) that specifies limits on the discharge of
water pollutants. Current law requires DNR to administer at least one pilot project
to evaluate the trading of water pollution credits. Under a pilot project, a person who
is required to obtain a water pollution permit may be authorized to discharge more
pollutants than would otherwise be allowed if the person reaches an agreement
under which another person agrees to reduce the amount of water pollution that the
other person causes or if the person reaches an agreement to provide money that
DNR or a local government uses to reduce water pollution.
This bill requires DNR to administer a program, rather than at least one pilot
project, for the trading of water pollution credits. In addition to providing for
agreements as under current law, the bill provides that DNR may authorize a person
who is required to obtain two water pollution permits to discharge more pollutants
than would otherwise be allowed under one permit if the person agrees to reduce the
amount of water pollution below what would otherwise be allowed under the second
permit. The bill also provides that DNR may authorize a person to discharge more
pollutants than would otherwise be allowed if the person agrees to construct a project
or implement a plan that results in reducing water pollution from sources other than
the permitted source.
Under current law and under the bill, a water pollution credit trading
agreement is only allowed if it results in an improvement in water quality and if the
increase and the reduction involve the same pollutant or the same water quality
standard. Under current law, a water pollution trading project may only be
conducted within a project area that meets specified criteria. This bill eliminates the
requirement concerning a project area, but requires that the increase and the
reduction in pollution occur within the same water basin or portion of a water basin,
as determined by DNR. Under current law, the term of a water pollution trading
agreement may not exceed five years. This bill eliminates the restriction on the term
of an agreement. Both current law and the bill require that trading of water pollution
credits be conducted in accordance with the federal Water Pollution Control Act.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Natural Resources, Ayes 16, Noes 0
Passed 16–0 Mar 9, 2012 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Feb 24, 2012 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Knilans, Endsley, Spanbauer and LeMahieu
- Feb 24, 2012 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Natural Resources
- Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 7, 2012 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Mar 7, 2012 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Mar 9, 2012 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by committee on Natural Resources, Ayes 16, Noes 0
- Mar 9, 2012 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1