Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
the prohibition on telephone solicitations to residential customers, granting rule-making authority, and making an appropriation.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Current law regulates "telephone solicitation," which is defined as the
unsolicited initiation of a telephone conversation for the purpose of encouraging the
recipient of the telephone call to purchase property, goods, or services. Current law
generally prohibits a telephone solicitor, or employee or contractor of a telephone
solicitor, from making a telephone solicitation to a residential customer if the
customer's landline or wireless telephone number is included in a nonsolicitation
directory maintained by the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer
Protection (DATCP), which lists residential customers who do not wish to receive
telephone solicitations. Current law exempts the following from the prohibition: 1)
telephone solicitations made by nonprofit organizations; 2) telephone solicitations
made in response to a recipient's request; and 3) telephone solicitations made to
current clients of the person selling property, goods, or services that are the reason
for the solicitation. Current law requires DATCP to promulgate rules requiring that
telephone solicitors register with DATCP and pay initial registration and annual
registration renewal fees to DATCP, which DATCP must use for establishing and
maintaining the nonsolicitation directory, as well as for consumer protection,
information, and education. Current law prohibits a telephone solicitor who is not
registered from requiring that employees or contractors make telephone
solicitations in this state. Current law also provides that if a residential customer
does not biennially renew his or her listing in the nonsolicitation directory, DATCP
must eliminate the customer's telephone number from the directory.
Federal law also regulates telephone solicitations by authorizing the Federal
Trade Commission (FTC) to prohibit deceptive and abusive telemarketing acts or
practices. Under that authority, the FTC has promulgated a regulation that, with
certain exceptions, prohibits a telemarketer from initiating a telephone call
encouraging the purchase of goods or services if the recipient's telephone number is
on a national "do-not-call" registry maintained by the FTC that consists of the
telephone numbers of persons who do not wish to receive such calls. One of the
exceptions applies to telemarketing calls to businesses. Federal law requires
telemarketers to pay annual fees in order to access the registry. The FTC allows a
person to add a landline or wireless telephone number to the registry through a
toll-free number or over the Internet. Under federal law, inclusion of a telephone
number in the registry is permanent and a person is not required to periodically
renew the inclusion. However, a person may remove a telephone number from the
registry and the FTC must periodically review the registry and remove telephone
numbers that have been disconnected or reassigned to another person.
This bill eliminates the state's nonsolicitation directory and instead prohibits
a telephone solicitor, or employee or contractor of a telephone solicitor, from making
a telephone solicitation, as defined under current state law, to a landline or wireless
telephone number that is included on a "state do-not-call registry," which the bill
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Consumer Protection and Personal Privacy, Ayes 7, Noes 1
Passed 7–1 Mar 6, 2012 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Feb 24, 2012 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Ripp, Jacque, Tranel, Spanbauer, Wynn, Marklein and Bies;Cosponsored by Senator Holperin
- Feb 24, 2012 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Consumer Protection and Personal Privacy
- Feb 27, 2012 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 28, 2012 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by committee on Consumer Protection and Personal Privacy, Ayes 7, Noes 1
- Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1