Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Assembly Bill 638

Technical changes to the qualified production activities income and franchise tax credit

Topics: Corporation: Taxation, Farmland preservation, Franchise: Taxation, Income tax: Credit, Industrial development, Revenue, Department of

Became law

The governor signed it on Apr 6, 2012. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 27, 2012

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 78 to 16

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Mar 14, 2012

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2011 Wisconsin Act 232

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 10, 2012: “Published 4-19-2012”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under the federal Internal Revenue Code, a taxpayer may claim a deduction equal to 9 percent of the taxpayer's qualified production activities income in the taxable year or 9 percent of the taxpayer's total taxable income, whichever is less.

For federal tax purposes, qualified production activities income is, generally, the amount of the taxpayer's domestic production gross receipts that exceed the sum of the cost of goods sold and other expenses, losses, or deductions. Domestic production gross receipts are, generally, gross receipts derived from property that was manufactured, produced, grown, or extracted in the United States.

Read the full summary

Under current law, as created by 2011 Wisconsin Act 32 , an individual taxpayer may claim a state income tax credit equal to the taxpayer's qualified production activities income derived from manufacturing property or agricultural property located in this state, multiplied by a certain percentage. A corporation may claim a state income and franchise tax credit equal to the lesser of its taxable income apportioned to this state or its qualified production activities income derived from manufacturing property or agricultural property located in this state, multiplied by a certain percentage. The percentage of qualified production activities income that a taxpayer may claim as a credit is 1.875 percent for 2013, 3.75 percent for 2014, 5.526 percent for 2015, and 7.5 percent for 2016 and for each year thereafter. Under current law, "qualified production activities income" means qualified production activities income as determined under the federal Internal Revenue Code for purposes of claiming a federal tax deduction.

This bill makes technical changes to the state tax credits for qualified production activities income derived from manufacturing property or agricultural property located in this state in order to facilitate the Department of Revenue's administration of the credits. Specifically, the bill provides a method for determining the qualified production activities income derived from manufacturing property or agricultural property located in this state rather than rely on the federal definition of "qualified production activities income," which includes income from economic activities in all states.

Who's behind it

Dale Kooyenga, a Republican, is its ⁠.

1 more lawmaker ⁠.

See all 2 names

Author (1)

Signed on in support (1)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 3 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Ways and Means vote to recommend it

Passed, 8 to 1 · Mar 6, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 8, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 58 to 36 · Mar 13, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 2 laid on table, Ayes 58, Noes 36”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 78 to 16 · Mar 13, 2012 · 5 didn't vote

See how each of the 99 representatives voted

D: Democrat, I: Independent, R: Republican

Yes (78)

Didn't vote (5)

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 78, Noes 16”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 10, 2012

    The new law was published.

  2. Apr 6, 2012

    The governor signed it. It became 2011 Wisconsin Act 232.

  3. Apr 5, 2012

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Mar 14, 2012

    The Senate passed it too.

  5. Mar 13, 2012

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.

  6. Mar 13, 2012

    The Senate received it.

  7. Mar 13, 2012

    The Assembly passed it, 78 to 16.

  8. Mar 7, 2012

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  9. Mar 6, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  10. Mar 6, 2012

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 8 to 1.

  11. Mar 1, 2012

    The committee held a public hearing.

  12. Feb 27, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Ways and Means.

  13. Feb 27, 2012

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 27, 2012 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representative Kooyenga;Cosponsored by Senator Grothman

  2. Feb 27, 2012 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Ways and Means

  3. Mar 1, 2012 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Kooyenga

  5. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 8, Noes 1

  7. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  8. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:47 A.M. on 3-13-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22

  9. Mar 7, 2012 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  10. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  11. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representatives Barca, Pasch, Bernard Schaber and Clark

  12. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 laid on table, Ayes 58, Noes 36

  13. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  14. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  15. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 78, Noes 16

  16. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  17. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  18. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  19. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  20. Mar 14, 2012 · Senate

    Rules suspended and taken up

  21. Mar 14, 2012 · Senate

    Read a second time

  22. Mar 14, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  23. Mar 14, 2012 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  24. Mar 14, 2012 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in

  25. Mar 14, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  26. Mar 14, 2012 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  27. Mar 29, 2012 · Assembly

    LRB correction

  28. Mar 29, 2012 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled

  29. Apr 5, 2012 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 4-5-2012

  30. Apr 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-6-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 232

  31. Apr 10, 2012 · Assembly

    Published 4-19-2012

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote