Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
custody and physical placement matters when a party is a service member.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Current law contains some specific provisions that apply to actions relating to
custody or physical placement of a child when a party in the action is a service
member. For these purposes, "service member" is defined as a member of the
national guard or of a reserve unit of the U.S. armed forces. Under current law, in
an action affecting the family, such as a divorce, the court may not consider as a factor
in determining legal custody of a child, or in determining whether to modify an
existing order of legal custody, whether a service member party has been or may be
called away to active duty in the U.S. armed forces. Also under current law, if a court
modifies an order of physical placement on the basis that a service member party has
been or will be called to active duty in the U.S. armed forces, the modification order
must require that the allocation of periods of physical placement or physical
placement schedule that was in effect before the modification be reinstated when the
service member is discharged from active duty.
This bill prohibits a court from modifying a legal custody order if a party is a
service member while the service member is on active duty in the U.S. armed forces.
The bill permits a service member who has been awarded periods of physical
placement with a child and who has been called to active duty in the U.S. armed
forces to petition the court to modify the physical placement order to allow a third
party designated by the service member to exercise the service member's periods of
physical placement with the child, on behalf of the service member, while the service
member is on active duty. The court may modify the order in the proposed manner
if it is appropriate and in the best interest of the child. Finally, the bill requires a
court to expedite hearings in actions affecting the family at the request of a service
member party, and to permit a service member party who is on active duty in the U.S.
armed forces to testify at hearings in an action affecting the family by telephone or
other electronic means.
Sponsors
Introduced by: Clark (D) , Pope-Roberts (D) , Radcliffe (D) , Spanbauer (R)
Votes
Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Veterans and Military Affairs, Ayes 11, Noes 0
Passed 11–0 Sep 20, 2011 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Mar 30, 2011 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Spanbauer, Clark, Pope-Roberts and Radcliffe
- Mar 30, 2011 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Veterans and Military Affairs
- Sep 1, 2011 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Sep 14, 2011 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Radcliffe
- Sep 15, 2011 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Sep 20, 2011 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Veterans and Military Affairs, Ayes 11, Noes 0
- Sep 20, 2011 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Veterans and Military Affairs, Ayes 11, Noes 0
- Sep 20, 2011 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1