Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Assembly Bill 663

Fraud, waste, and mismanagement in state government and authorizing the expenditure of funds

Topics: Administration, Department of: Budget and fiscal issues, Fraud, Legislative Audit Bureau, Legislature: Member, State agencies

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 6, 2012

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Assembly vote, not reached

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Assembly Committee on Ways and Means. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Current law requires the Legislative Audit Bureau (LAB) to maintain a toll-free telephone number with voice mail to receive reports of fraud, waste, and mismanagement in state government. LAB must relay these reports either to the appropriate LAB employee for investigation or to a state agency for investigation.

If the state agency conducts the investigation, it must deliver the results of the investigation to LAB in a timely manner.

Read the full summary

This bill provides that if an LAB or state agency investigation finds that fraud, waste, or mismanagement has occurred, the individual submitting the report must be paid a reward equal to $100,000, 2 percent of the moneys that are recovered in any legal action resulting from the fraud, waste, or mismanagement, or 2 percent of the moneys that are saved in the succeeding fiscal year as a result of eliminating the fraud, waste, or mismanagement, whichever is least. Under the bill, LAB must determine whether moneys can be saved or recovered as a result of eliminating the fraud, waste, or mismanagement and must certify to the secretary of administration the amounts to be paid as rewards to individuals. The secretary of administration must pay the rewards from the appropriation account that is used to fund the program that is the focus of the report of fraud, waste, or mismanagement.

The bill also provides that a senator or representative to the assembly may make a report to LAB on behalf of any individual who contacts the office of the senator or representative. If an LAB or state agency investigation finds that fraud, waste, or mismanagement has occurred, the senator or representative must identify the individual who must be paid the award. A senator or representative may also introduce a bill on behalf of the individual to eliminate the fraud, waste, or mismanagement. If the bill is enacted and if LAB determines that the legislation will eliminate the fraud, waste, or mismanagement, the individual shall be paid the award.

Who's behind it

5 lawmakers are its ⁠. All 5 are Republicans.

See all 5 names

Authors (5)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2012

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Mar 22, 2012

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  3. Mar 20, 2012

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  4. Mar 6, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Ways and Means.

  5. Mar 6, 2012

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Weininger, Jacque, Marklein, Thiesfeldt and Tranel

  2. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Ways and Means

  3. Mar 20, 2012 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Mar 22, 2012 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate