Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Assembly Bill 668

Terminating a tenancy for criminal activity and requiring notice to landlord of nuisance investigation by law enforcement agency

Topics: Crime and criminals, Landlord and tenant, Municipality: Ordinance, Nuisance, Police

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 6, 2012

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Assembly vote, not reached

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Assembly Committee on Housing. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, a tenant's tenancy may be terminated by the landlord for, among other things, nonpayment of rent, committing waste, or breaching a covenant or condition of the tenant's rental agreement, or if the property owner receives notice from a law enforcement agency or the office of the district attorney that a nuisance exists in the rental unit because the property is being used for drug-related purposes or criminal gang-related purposes. Under this bill, a property owner may terminate the tenancy of a residential tenant if criminal activity caused by any person takes place in the tenant's rental unit or if criminal activity caused by the tenant, a member of the tenant's household, or an invited guest or associate of the tenant or of a member of the tenant's household takes place on the property owner's rental property.

Criminal activity is defined in the bill as any act or behavior that is punishable in this state by a fine or period of imprisonment or that is a violation of an ordinance of the county, city, village, or town in which the rental property is located.

Read the full summary

The property owner must provide written notice to the tenant to vacate the property on or before a date that is at least five days after the notice is given. The notice, which does not give the tenant the right to cure the breach, must advise the tenant of the basis for its issuance and of the tenant's right to contest the termination of tenancy in an eviction action. If the tenant contests the termination of tenancy in an eviction action, the property owner must prove the allegation of criminal activity by the greater preponderance of the credible evidence. The termination of tenancy does not relieve the tenant of any obligation, such as payment of rent, to the property owner.

Also under the bill, if a county, city, village, or town has an ordinance regulating nuisances, the local law enforcement agency must notify the owner or property manager of residential rental property whenever the law enforcement agency investigates an alleged nuisance at the residential rental property.

Who's behind it

9 lawmakers are its ⁠. 7 are Republicans, 1 is a Democrat and 1 is a Independent.

See all 9 names

Authors (9)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2012

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Mar 22, 2012

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  3. Mar 6, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Housing.

  4. Mar 6, 2012

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Honadel, Endsley, Jacque, A. Ott, Rivard, Spanbauer, Staskunas, Stroebel and Ziegelbauer

  2. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Housing

  3. Mar 22, 2012 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Mar 22, 2012 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate