Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
legislative consideration of a biennial budget bill.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill makes the following changes relating to consideration of biennial
budget bills:
Earmark transparency report
The bill requires the Legislative Fiscal Bureau (LFB) to prepare an earmark
transparency report on each biennial budget bill and on each amendment thereto.
The report must contain all of the following: a list of all earmarks; the cost of each
earmark; and the beneficiary of each earmark. If the beneficiary is an individual,
LFB must identify the assembly and senate district in which the beneficiary resides.
If the beneficiary is an entity, LFB must identify the assembly and senate district in
which the beneficiary is located, incorporated, or organized. With respect to an
amendment to a biennial budget bill, LFB must identify the representative to the
assembly or senator who proposed the earmark.
Joint Committee on Finance consideration of biennial budget bill
The bill provides that the Joint Committee on Finance may not vote to
recommend passage of a biennial budget bill or an amendment thereto until LFB has
distributed a copy of the earmark transparency report to each member of the
legislature and has made the report available on the legislature's Internet Web site.
Senate and assembly consideration of biennial budget bill
The bill provides that neither house of the legislature may pass a biennial
budget bill until LFB has distributed a copy of the earmark transparency report on
the biennial budget bill, as amended, to each member of the legislature and has made
the report available on the legislature's Internet Web site. The bill further provides
that, if a committee of conference is convened on a biennial budget bill, a conference
report may not contain any earmark that was not included in the executive budget
bill or an amendment thereto that was passed by either house of the legislature but
may reduce any earmark that was so included.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Full history
- Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Kramer, Bernier, Endsley, Farrow, Jacque, Kapenga, Kestell, Kooyenga, LeMahieu, J. Ott, Petersen, Petryk, Rivard, Spanbauer, Steineke, Strachota, Thiesfeldt and Wynn;Cosponsored by Senators Zipperer, Leibham, Vukmir, Carpenter and Galloway
- Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Jobs, Economy and Small Business
- Mar 8, 2012 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1