Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Assembly Bill 678

Disqualifying a judge or justice

Topics: Attorney, Court: Procedure, Judge, Supreme Court

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 8, 2012

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Assembly vote, not reached

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Assembly Committee on Judiciary and Ethics. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, a judge or justice is required to disqualify himself or herself from presiding over or deciding any legal action under certain circumstances that render the judge or justice incapable of acting in an impartial manner or that make it appear that the judge or justice cannot act in an impartial manner.

This bill requires a judge or justice to disqualify himself or herself from presiding over or deciding any legal action if any legal counsel that represents a party in the action had ever represented the judge or justice under a contingency fee arrangement.

Who's behind it

Fred Clark, a Democrat, is its ⁠.

See all the details

Author (1)

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2012

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Mar 8, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Judiciary and Ethics.

  3. Mar 8, 2012

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 8, 2012 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representative Clark

  2. Mar 8, 2012 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary and Ethics

  3. Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor