Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Assembly Bill 683

Equally divided determinations of the Wisconsin Supreme Court on matters of judicial discipline or permanent disability

Topics: Court: Commissioner, Judge, Jury, Supreme Court

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 8, 2012

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Assembly vote, not reached

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Assembly Committee on Judiciary and Ethics. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, the Judicial Commission (commission) must investigate any possible misconduct or permanent disability of a judge or circuit or supplemental court commissioner. If, after the investigation, the commission finds probable cause that the judge or court commissioner has engaged in misconduct or has a permanent disability, the commission must file a petition with the Wisconsin Supreme Court (supreme court) and prosecute the case against the judge or court commissioner. The case is heard either by a panel of judges or, when requested by the commission, a jury.

Also under current law, the supreme court must review the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations made by the panel of judges and determine appropriate discipline of the judge or court commissioner in cases of misconduct and appropriate action in cases of permanent disability.

Read the full summary

This bill provides that, in cases where the supreme court is equally divided on the question of appropriate discipline or action, the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations of the panel of judges are binding on the disciplined or disabled judge or court commissioner. The bill also clarifies that, in those cases of discipline or permanent disability that are heard by a jury, the supreme court must review the jury verdict and recommendations of the presiding judge. If the supreme court is equally divided on the question of appropriate discipline or action in a case heard by a jury, the jury verdict and recommendations of the presiding judge are binding on the disciplined or disabled judge or court commissioner.

Who's behind it

11 lawmakers are its ⁠. All 11 are Democrats.

2 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 13 names

Authors (11)

Signed on in support (2)

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2012

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Mar 8, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Judiciary and Ethics.

  3. Mar 8, 2012

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 8, 2012 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Hebl, Jorgensen, Roys, C. Taylor, Berceau, Turner, Pasch, Richards, Bewley, Pope-Roberts and Kessler;Cosponsored by Senators S. Coggs and C. Larson

  2. Mar 8, 2012 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary and Ethics

  3. Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor