Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Assembly Bill 746

Discontinuance of the use of voting machines, recounts of machine-readable ballots, petitions for recounts, inspection of areas where voted ballots are stored, and destruction of ballots after an election

Topics: Elections: Ballots, Elections: Contested elections, Elections: Officials, Voting machine

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 15, 2012

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Assembly vote, not reached

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Assembly Committee on Election and Campaign Reform. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill makes various changes in election laws relating to the discontinuance of the use of voting machines, recounts of machine-readable ballots, petitions for recounts, the inspection of areas where voted ballots are stored, and the destruction of ballots after an election.

Discontinuance of the use of voting machines Currently, with limited exceptions, every municipality with a population of 7,500 or more must use voting machines or an electronic voting system at all primaries and other elections held in the municipality. Either mechanical or electronic voting machines may be used. No electronic voting system, including an electronic voting machine, may be used unless the system meets statutory standards and is approved by the Government Accountability Board for use at elections held in this state. All voting machines must be tested before each election to determine if they are functioning properly. If voting machines are used, ballots need not be printed and distributed to electors, but if electronic voting machines are used, the machines must maintain a cumulative tally of votes cast that is retrievable in the event of a power outage, evacuation, or malfunction so that the record of the votes cast prior to the time that the problem occurs is preserved. This bill discontinues the authorization for municipalities to use mechanical or electronic voting machines at elections held in this state. Under the bill, if an electronic voting system is used, the system must be of a type in which printed ballots are distributed to electors.

Read the full summary

Recounts of machine-readable ballots Currently, with a limited exception, a board of canvassers must use automatic tabulating equipment to conduct a recount of ballots that are in machine-readable form. However, a candidate, or an elector if the recount is for a referendum question, may petition the circuit court for an order requiring ballots in machine-readable form to be recounted by hand or by another method approved by the court. To obtain such an order, the candidate or elector must show by clear and convincing evidence that due to an irregularity or mistake committed during the voting or canvassing process the results of a recount using automatic tabulating equipment will produce incorrect results and there is a substantial probability that recounting the ballots by hand or by another method will produce a more correct result and change the outcome of the election. This bill provides instead that the elector who petitions for a recount, a candidate at the election, or an elector who voted in a referendum that is the subject of a recount may file a written demand for the board of canvassers to recount the ballots in an election, or the ballots from a specified ward or polling place, by hand, in which case the board of canvassers must recount those ballots by hand.

Petitions for recounts Currently, any candidate voted for at an election may petition for a recount of the votes cast at the election. If the difference between the votes cast for the leading candidate and the candidate receiving the next highest number of votes is less than ten if 1,000 or less votes are cast or not more than 0.5 percent if more than 1,000 votes are cast, the cost of the recount is paid by the local government or governments where the votes are cast. If the difference in the numbers of votes cast exceeds that level, the petitioner must may a fee that depends upon the difference in the numbers of votes cast. This bill permits any elector who voted in an election for an office to petition for a recount of the votes cast at the election. Under the bill, the petitioner must pay a fee equal to the actual cost of performing the recount.

Destruction of ballots after an election Currently, ballots at an election may be destroyed no earlier than 30 days after the election except that: 1) ballots at a federal election must be retained until 22 months after that election; 2) if a recount or appeal of a recount is pending or if the time for petitioning for a recount or review of a recount determination has not expired on the 30th day after an election, ballots must be retained until the recount or appeal is finally adjudicated; and 3) a court may order the retention of ballots for a longer period. This bill provides that ballots at an election must be retained until 14 days before the next regularly scheduled election but in no case earlier than 30 days after an election.

Inspection of areas where voted ballots are stored This bill permits any individual, with reasonable prior notice to a municipal clerk or board of election commissioners, to inspect an area in which ballots relating to an election are stored after the election. The bill does not permit an individual to inspect ballots or to require the breaking of seals on ballot bags or containers.

Who's behind it

Kelda Roys, a Democrat, is its ⁠.

See all the details

Author (1)

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2012

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Mar 15, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Election and Campaign Reform.

  3. Mar 15, 2012

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representative Roys

  2. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Election and Campaign Reform

  3. Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor