Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Assembly Bill 80

Operating a motor vehicle without a valid driver's license or after suspension or revocation of an operating privilege and providing penalties

Topics: Court, Damage (personal injury), Death, Forfeiture, Legislature: Criminal Penalties, Joint Review Committee on, Motor vehicle: Driver's license, Railroad: Crossing, Sentences and penalties, Traffic officer, Transportation, Department of: Vehicles

Became law

The governor signed it on Dec 16, 2011. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Apr 7, 2011

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 69 to 24

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Nov 2, 2011

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2011 Wisconsin Act 113

Latest entry in the official record, Dec 20, 2011: “Published 12-30-2011”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Current law prohibits a person from operating a motor vehicle on a highway during any period in which the person's motor vehicle operating privilege is suspended (operating while suspended or OWS) or revoked (operating after revocation or OAR) or, with limited exceptions, if the person does not possess a valid operator's license (operating without a license or OWL).

Under current law, a person convicted of OWS must forfeit not less than $50 nor more than $200. In addition, a person convicted of "knowing" OWS may be required to forfeit not more than $200. A person convicted of OAR must forfeit not more than $2,500 unless the underlying operating privilege revocation was the result of specified traffic violations involving alcohol or controlled substances. A person convicted of OAR for whom the underlying operating privilege revocation was the result of specified traffic violations involving alcohol or controlled substances must be fined not more than $2,500 or imprisoned for not more than one year or both. Also under current law, as created in 2005 Wisconsin Act 412 , a person who, in the course of a "knowing" OWS violation or OAR violation, causes: 1) damage to the property of another must forfeit $1,000; 2) injury to another person must forfeit $5,000; or 3) great bodily harm or death to another person is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor, punishable by a maximum fine of $10,000 or a maximum term of imprisonment of nine months or both.

Read the full summary

Under current law, with limited exceptions, a person convicted of OWL with respect to a motor vehicle that is not a commercial motor vehicle may be required to forfeit not more than $200 for the first offense, may be fined not more than $300 and imprisoned for not more than 30 days for the second offense occurring within three years, and may be fined not more than $500 and imprisoned for not more than six months for the third or subsequent offense occurring within three years. Under one exception, if the OWL violation results from the person's operator's license being expired for not more than three months and the person has no prior OWL convictions, the person may be required to forfeit not more than $100 for the OWL violation.

Under another exception, as created in 2005 Wisconsin Act 412 , if, in the course of operating the vehicle knowingly without a valid operator's license or knowingly with an operator's license that has been revoked, suspended, or canceled, the person causes: 1) damage to the property of another, the person must forfeit $1,000; 2) injury to another person, the person must forfeit $5,000; or 3) great bodily harm or death to another person, the person is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.

This bill repeals "knowing" OWS as a separate and distinct violation and repeals all other provisions of 2005 Wisconsin Act 412 . The bill creates new penalties for OWS, OAR, and OWL violations in which the person, in the course of the violation, causes great bodily harm or death to another person.

Under the bill, a person convicted of OWL or OWS who, in the course of the violation, causes great bodily harm to another person: 1) must forfeit not less than $5,000 nor more than $7,500 if, at the time of the violation, the person did not know, respectively, that he or she did not possess a valid operator's license or that his or her operating privilege was suspended; or 2) is guilty of a Class I felony if the person knew. A Class I felony is punishable by a maximum fine of $10,000 or a maximum term of imprisonment of three and one-half years or both. If the person causes the death of another in the course of the OWL or OWS violation, the person: 1) must forfeit not less than $7,500 nor more than $10,000 if the person did not know, respectively, that he or she did not possess a valid operator's license or that his or her operating privilege was suspended; or 2) is guilty of a Class H felony if the person knew. A Class H felony is punishable by a maximum fine of $10,000 or a maximum term of imprisonment of six years or both. A person convicted of OAR who, in the course of the violation, causes great bodily harm to another person: 1) must be fined not less than $5,000 nor more than $7,500 or imprisoned for not more than one year or both if, at the time of the violation, the person did not know that his or her operating privilege was revoked; or 2) is guilty of a Class I felony if the person knew.

If the person causes the death of another in the course of the OAR violation, the person: 1) must be fined not less than $7,500 nor more than $10,000 or imprisoned for not more than one year or both if the person did not know that his or her operating privilege was revoked; or 2) is guilty of a Class H felony if the person knew.

Under current law, a court may suspend a person's operating privilege for any period not exceeding six months upon the person's conviction for OAR or OWS or operating a commercial motor vehicle during a period in which the person is disqualified (operating while disqualified or OWD). A court may revoke a person's operating privilege, for a period of six months or less, for a fourth or subsequent conviction for OAR, OWS, or OWD within a five-year period.

This bill requires a court to revoke a person's operating privilege if the person is convicted of OWL, OWS, or OAR and, in the course of the violation, the person causes great bodily harm or death to another person. The bill also provides that, as with OWS and OAR, the Department of Transportation may revoke a resident's operating privilege if the resident is convicted in another state for an OWL offense in the course of which the person causes great bodily harm or death to another person.

Under current law, a vehicle operator may not drive on or across a railroad crossing while any traffic officer or railroad employee signals to stop, while any warning device signals to stop, or, if any crossbuck sign is maintained at the crossing, while any train occupies or closely approaches the crossing. A vehicle operator may not drive through or around any crossing gate or barrier at a railroad crossing while the gate or barrier is closed or is being opened or closed. A court may revoke a person's operating privilege upon the person's first conviction of any of these violations and must revoke the person's operating privilege upon the person's second or subsequent conviction within a five-year period. The revocation is for six months.

This bill provides for suspension of a person's operating privilege, rather than revocation of the person's operating privilege, for any of these violations.

Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime, the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a report concerning the proposed penalty and the costs or savings that are likely to result if the bill is enacted.

Who's behind it

28 lawmakers are its ⁠. 14 are Republicans and 3 are Democrats. 11 have no party on record.

10 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 38 names

Authors (28)

Signed on in support (10)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There were 4 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Transportation vote to recommend it

Passed, 15 to 0 · Sep 7, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 15, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote

Failed, 31 to 65 · Oct 18, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Refused to refer to joint committee on Finance, Ayes 31, Noes 65”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 69 to 24 · Oct 18, 2011 · 5 didn't vote

See how each of the 98 representatives voted

D: Democrat, I: Independent, R: Republican

Yes (69)

Didn't vote (5)

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 69, Noes 24”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Transportation and Elections vote to recommend it

Passed, 4 to 1 · Nov 1, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by committee on Transportation and Elections, Ayes 4, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Dec 20, 2011

    The new law was published.

  2. Dec 16, 2011

    The governor signed it. It became 2011 Wisconsin Act 113.

  3. Dec 8, 2011

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Nov 2, 2011

    The Senate passed it too.

  5. Nov 1, 2011

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 4 to 1.

  6. Oct 31, 2011

    The committee held a public hearing.

  7. Oct 19, 2011

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Transportation and Elections.

  8. Oct 19, 2011

    The Senate received it.

  9. Oct 18, 2011

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  10. Oct 18, 2011

    The Assembly passed it, 69 to 24.

  11. Sep 7, 2011

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  12. Sep 7, 2011

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 15 to 0.

  13. Jun 8, 2011

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  14. May 24, 2011

    The committee held a public hearing.

  15. Apr 14, 2011

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  16. Apr 7, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  17. Apr 7, 2011

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Transportation.

  18. Apr 7, 2011

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Apr 7, 2011 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Krusick, Stone, Turner, Bies, Brooks, Kaufert, Kerkman, Kleefisch, Krug, LeMahieu, Mursau, Nygren, J. Ott, Ripp, Rivard, Spanbauer and Staskunas, by request of The family of Nicholas Dams, the family of Kristy Wanek, Rob Dams, father of Nicholas and retired Police Chief, Wisconsin Chiefs of Police Association, Milwaukee County Law Enforcement Executive Association, Milwaukee Police Association, Milwaukee Deputy Sheriffs' Association, Milwaukee County District Attorney John Chisholm, and Greendale Professional Police Association;Cosponsored by Senators Carpenter, Lazich, Darling, Hansen, Olsen, Schultz and Zipperer

  2. Apr 7, 2011 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation

  3. Apr 7, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Apr 14, 2011 · Assembly

    Representative Vos added as a coauthor

  5. May 24, 2011 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  6. Jun 8, 2011 · Assembly

    Representative Jorgensen added as a coauthor

  7. Aug 30, 2011 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  8. Sep 7, 2011 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 15, Noes 0

  9. Sep 7, 2011 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  10. Oct 12, 2011 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 10-18-2011 by committee on Rules

  11. Oct 18, 2011 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  12. Oct 18, 2011 · Assembly

    Refused to refer to joint committee on Finance, Ayes 31, Noes 65

  13. Oct 18, 2011 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  14. Oct 18, 2011 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  15. Oct 18, 2011 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 69, Noes 24

  16. Oct 18, 2011 · Assembly

    Representative Steinbrink added as a coauthor

  17. Oct 18, 2011 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  18. Oct 19, 2011 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  19. Oct 19, 2011 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation and Elections

  20. Oct 31, 2011 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  21. Nov 1, 2011 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  22. Nov 1, 2011 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by committee on Transportation and Elections, Ayes 4, Noes 1

  23. Nov 1, 2011 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  24. Nov 1, 2011 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 11-2-2011 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  25. Nov 2, 2011 · Senate

    Read a second time

  26. Nov 2, 2011 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  27. Nov 2, 2011 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  28. Nov 2, 2011 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in

  29. Nov 2, 2011 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  30. Nov 3, 2011 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  31. Nov 7, 2011 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled

  32. Dec 8, 2011 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 12-8-2010

  33. Dec 16, 2011 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 12-15-2011. 2011 Wisconsin Act 113

  34. Dec 20, 2011 · Assembly

    Published 12-30-2011

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote