Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Assembly Bill 82

Wildlife damage abatement assistance and claim payments for damage caused by cougar

Topics: County: Finance, Damage (to property), Game

Became law

The governor signed it on Apr 13, 2012. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Apr 7, 2011

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 97 to 0

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Mar 14, 2012

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2011 Wisconsin Act 280

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 17, 2012: “Published 4-26-2012”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Current law authorizes a person who owns, leases, or controls land on which certain wild animals cause damage to crops or livestock (wildlife damage) to apply to the county for wildlife damage claim payments and for wildlife damage abatement assistance (wildlife damage payments). With certain exceptions, the person may receive wildlife damage payments only if the person opens the land for hunting the type of animal that caused the wildlife damage. Wildlife damage for which a person is eligible to receive wildlife damage payments includes wildlife damage caused by deer, bear, and geese.

This bill adds wildlife damage caused by cougar to the type of damage for which a person is eligible to receive wildlife damage payments. The bill also exempts that person from the requirement that the land be open for the hunting of cougar in order to be eligible to receive wildlife damage payments.

Who's behind it

4 representatives are its ⁠. 2 are Democrats and 2 are Republicans.

4 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 8 names

Authors (4)

Signed on in support (4)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Natural Resources vote to recommend it

Passed, 12 to 0 · Nov 7, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Natural Resources, Ayes 12, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 97 to 0 · Mar 13, 2012 · 2 didn't vote

See how each of the 99 representatives voted

D: Democrat, I: Independent, R: Republican

Yes (97)

Didn't vote (2)

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 97, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 17, 2012

    The new law was published.

  2. Apr 13, 2012

    The governor signed it. It became 2011 Wisconsin Act 280.

  3. Apr 5, 2012

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Mar 14, 2012

    The Senate passed it too.

  5. Mar 13, 2012

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.

  6. Mar 13, 2012

    The Senate received it.

  7. Mar 13, 2012

    The Assembly passed it, 97 to 0.

  8. Nov 7, 2011

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  9. Nov 7, 2011

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 12 to 0.

  10. Oct 26, 2011

    The committee held a public hearing.

  11. May 2, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  12. Apr 7, 2011

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Natural Resources.

  13. Apr 7, 2011

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Apr 7, 2011 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Vruwink, Spanbauer, Turner and Ripp;Cosponsored by Senators Lassa, Schultz, Kedzie and Taylor

  2. Apr 7, 2011 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Natural Resources

  3. May 2, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Oct 26, 2011 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Nov 3, 2011 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Nov 7, 2011 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Natural Resources, Ayes 12, Noes 0

  7. Nov 7, 2011 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  8. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Rules suspended to withdraw from committee on Rules and take up

  9. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  10. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  11. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  12. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 97, Noes 0

  13. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  14. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  15. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  16. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  17. Mar 14, 2012 · Senate

    Rules suspended and taken up

  18. Mar 14, 2012 · Senate

    Read a second time

  19. Mar 14, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  20. Mar 14, 2012 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  21. Mar 14, 2012 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in

  22. Mar 14, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  23. Mar 14, 2012 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  24. Mar 20, 2012 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled

  25. Apr 5, 2012 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 4-5-2012

  26. Apr 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-12-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 280

  27. Apr 17, 2012 · Assembly

    Published 4-26-2012

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote