Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
corrections and sentencing.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
2009 Wisconsin Act 28
(the Act) made several changes to the adult correctional
system, most of which took effect on October 1, 2009. Prior to the effective date of
the provisions relating to the adult correctional system (pre-Act), a person who was
imprisoned for a felony he or she committed prior to December 31, 1999, was allowed
to petition the parole commission in the Department of Corrections (DOC) to be
released to parole after the person served 25 percent of his or her sentence, or six
months, whichever was greater. The parole commission determined whether, and
under what conditions, the person should be released to parole. A person who
committed a felony on or after December 31, 1999, is sentenced to a bifurcated
sentence, with the first portion of the sentence served in confinement and the second
portion served under extended supervision in the community.
Pre-Act, a person who was serving a bifurcated sentence was, with few
exceptions, required to serve the entire confinement portion of his or her sentence
before being released to extended supervision. A person's confinement portion could
have been extended if he or she violated a prison regulation. If a person's
confinement portion was extended for such a violation, the law pre-Act required his
or her extended supervision portion to be reduced so that the total length of the
person's sentence remained unchanged.
The law pre-Act allowed a person who is sentenced to a bifurcated sentence for
a Class C to Class I felony to petition the sentencing court to adjust his or her
sentence and release the person from prison to extended supervision if he or she has
served 85 percent (for Class C to Class E felonies) or 75 percent (for Class F to Class
I felonies) of the confinement portion of the sentence. If a person's confinement
portion was reduced by the sentencing court, the law pre-Act required his or her
extended supervision portion to be extended so that the total length of the person's
sentence remained unchanged. Pre-Act, a person who was released to extended
supervision was required to serve his or her entire sentence before extended
supervision terminated.
The Act renamed the parole commission the earned release review commission
(ERRC) and allows most persons who are incarcerated for a Class C to Class I felony
to earn "positive adjustment time" toward early release from confinement. Under
the Act, the amount of positive adjustment time a person can earn varies depending
on the classification of the felony, the person's history and likelihood of reoffending,
and other factors determined by DOC.
The Act allows DOC to release the person to extended supervision when he or
she serves his entire period of confinement, minus positive adjustment time earned,
subject to court review. Under the Act, if a person's period of confinement is reduced
by positive adjustment time, his or her period of extended supervision is increased
so that the length of the sentence does not change. The Act requires the ERRC to
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: Bies (R) , Brooks (R) , Endsley (R) , Honadel (R) , Jacque (R) , Kaufert (R) , Kestell (R) , Kleefisch (R) , Klenke (R) , Knodl (R) , Krug (R) , LeMahieu (R) , Marklein (R) , Mursau (R) , Murtha (R) , Petersen (R) , Petryk (R) , Ripp (R) , Rivard (R) , Severson (R) , Spanbauer (R) , Steineke (R) , Stone (R) , Strachota (R) , Suder (R) , T. Larson (R) , Thiesfeldt (R) , Ziegelbauer (I)
Votes
Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Criminal Justice and Corrections, Ayes 5, Noes 3
Passed 5–3 May 12, 2011 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Apr 7, 2011 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Suder, Krug, Jacque, Petersen, Spanbauer, Ziegelbauer, Steineke, Severson, T. Larson, Kestell, Mursau, Thiesfeldt, LeMahieu, Strachota, Kleefisch, Murtha, Endsley, Marklein, Rivard, Honadel, Bies, Kaufert, Stone, Brooks, Petryk, Ripp, Knodl and Klenke;Cosponsored by Senators Wanggaard, Leibham, Moulton, Zipperer and Galloway
- Apr 7, 2011 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Criminal Justice and Corrections
- Apr 7, 2011 · Assembly
Representative Williams added as a coauthor
- Apr 15, 2011 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 15, 2011 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 15, 2011 · Assembly
Representative Farrow added as a coauthor
- Apr 25, 2011 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- May 5, 2011 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- May 6, 2011 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- May 12, 2011 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by committee on Criminal Justice and Corrections
- May 12, 2011 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Criminal Justice and Corrections, Ayes 5, Noes 3
- May 12, 2011 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Criminal Justice and Corrections, Ayes 5, Noes 3
- May 12, 2011 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- May 12, 2011 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 5-17-2011 by committee on Rules
- May 12, 2011 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- May 17, 2011 · Assembly
LRB correction
- May 17, 2011 · Assembly
Placed at the foot of the calendar of 5-17-2011
- May 17, 2011 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Radcliffe
- May 17, 2011 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 3 offered by Representative Radcliffe
- Sep 13, 2011 · Assembly
Laid on the table
- Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1