Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
expanding the number of tax incremental financing districts that may be designated as distressed or severely distressed.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under the current tax incremental financing program, a city or village may
create a tax incremental district (TID) in part of its territory to foster development
if at least 50 percent of the area to be included in the TID is blighted, in need of
rehabilitation or conservation, suitable for industrial sites, or suitable for mixed-use
development. Currently, towns and counties also have a limited ability to create a
TID under certain circumstances. Before a city or village may create a TID, several
steps and plans are required. These steps and plans include public hearings on the
proposed TID within specified time frames, preparation and adoption by the local
planning commission of a proposed project plan for the TID, approval of the proposed
project plan by the common council or village board, approval of the city's or village's
proposed TID by a joint review board that consists of members who represent the
overlying taxation districts, and adoption of a resolution by the common council or
village board that creates the TID as of a date provided in the resolution.
Also under current law, once a TID has been created, the Department of
Revenue (DOR) calculates the "tax incremental base" value of the TID, which is the
equalized value of all taxable property within the TID at the time of its creation. If
the development in the TID increases the value of the property in the TID above the
base value, a "value increment" is created. That portion of taxes collected on the
value increment in excess of the base value is called a "tax increment." The tax
increment is placed in a special fund that may be used only to pay back the project
costs of the TID. The costs of a TID, which are initially incurred by the creating city
or village, include public works such as sewers, streets, and lighting systems;
financing costs; site preparation costs; and professional service costs. DOR
authorizes the allocation of the tax increments until the TID terminates or, generally,
20 years, 23 years, or 27 years after the TID is created, depending on the type of TID
and the year in which it was created. Under certain circumstances, the life of the TID
and the allocation period may be extended.
Under certain limited circumstances, a TID that has paid off all of its project
costs but has not reached its mandatory termination date may become a donor TID,
continue to receive tax increments, and forward those increments to a recipient TID
created by the same city or village.
Currently, a city or village that acts before October 1, 2011, may designate a TID
that was created before October 1, 2008, as a distressed or severely distressed TID
(distressed TID) if a number of steps occur. The city or village must adopt a resolution
finding that its project costs incurred on the TID exceed the revenues the city or
village expects the TID to generate during its lifetime. The municipal clerk must
send to DOR and the joint review board a copy of the resolution and the related
financial data that the city or village used when it adopted its resolution.
Before the city or village may adopt the resolution concerning its project costs,
the common council must hold a public hearing at which interested parties may
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 9, Noes 0
Passed 9–0 Jul 14, 2011 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Apr 12, 2011 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Murtha, Fields, Petrowski, Rivard, Brooks and Petryk;Cosponsored by Senators Harsdorf and Moulton
- Apr 12, 2011 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Ways and Means
- Apr 25, 2011 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jun 2, 2011 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Jul 12, 2011 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Kerkman
- Jul 14, 2011 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Jul 14, 2011 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 9, Noes 0
- Jul 14, 2011 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 8, Noes 1
- Jul 14, 2011 · Assembly
Referred to Calendar of 7-20-2011 pursuant to Assembly Rule 93
- Jul 20, 2011 · Assembly
Laid on the table
- Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1