Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Assembly Joint Resolution 100

Accounting and expenditure of state funds and reduction of deficit (first consideration)

Topics: Administration, Department of: Budget and fiscal issues, Appropriation, Bills, Legislative, Budget bills and process, Constitutional amendments: First consideration, Debt, Public

Passed the Assembly, then stopped

The Assembly passed it on Feb 21, 2012, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to ⁠. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new proposal.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 1, 2012

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Feb 21, 2012

  4. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.

  5. Adopted, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ⁠”

Read the proposal

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This proposed constitutional amendment, proposed to the 2011 legislature on first consideration, requires the state to account for and report all funds it receives or expends in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).

The amendment further authorizes the legislature to establish the budgetary basis of accounting, requires that any deficit of a state fund affected by a budget bill be reduced annually by 10 percent of any projected increase in tax revenues in that fund, and requires that once the deficit is eliminated, the legislature may not pass any bill that would result in a projected deficit.

Read the full summary

A constitutional amendment requires adoption by two successive legislatures, and ratification by the people, before it can become effective.

AJR100, s. 1 3 Section 1 .

Section 5 of article VIII of the constitution is amended to read:

AJR100,2,14 4 [Article VIII] Section 5. The legislature shall provide for an annual tax 5 sufficient to defray the estimated expenses of the state for each year; and whenever 6 the expenses of any year shall exceed the income, the legislature shall provide for 7 levying a tax for the ensuing year, sufficient, with other sources of income, to pay the 1 deficiency as well as the estimated expenses of such ensuing year.

The legislature 2 may establish the basis of accounting to be used for budget purposes. In addition to 3 the statutory basis of accounting, the state shall account for and report all funds it 4 receives or spends including, but not limited to, component units in accordance with 5 generally accepted accounting principles. The legislature may not pass any bill that 6 would cause an increase in the projected deficit in any state fund under generally 7 accepted accounting principles. The legislature shall pass an annual or biennial 8 budget bill that is projected to reduce any existing deficit in any state fund that is 9 affected by the budget bill reported under generally accepted accounting principles 10 by at least one-tenth of any projected annual increase of tax revenues deposited in 11 that state fund in each fiscal year. Once any deficit in a state fund under generally 12 accepted accounting principles is eliminated, the legislature may not pass any bill 13 affecting that fund that would result in a projected deficit in that state fund under 14 generally accepted accounting principles.

AJR100,2,17 15 Be it further resolved, That this proposed amendment be referred to the 16 legislature to be chosen at the next general election and that it be published for three 17 months previous to the time of holding such election.

AJR100,2,18 18 (End) Down Down /2011/related/proposals/ajr100 true proposaltext /2011/related/proposals/ajr100 proposaltext/2011/REG/AJR100 proposaltext/2011/REG/AJR100 section true Menu » 2011 » Related Documents » Proposal Text » AJR100: Joint Resolution Text × Details for PDF view Link (Permanent link) Bookmark this location View toggle Go to top of document Search in this chapter Search in this section Search in this agency Search in this chapter group Search in this chapter Search in this section Cross references for section Acts affecting this section References to this 1970 Statutes Annotations Appellate Court Citations Administrative Code Index Reference lines Clear highlighting $(document).ready(function () {

$('[data-toggle=tooltip]').tooltip({ container: 'body' });

});

Who's behind it

37 lawmakers are its ⁠. 35 are Republicans, 1 is a Democrat and 1 is a Independent.

9 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 46 names

Authors (37)

Signed on in support (9)

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this proposal, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 4 votes on this proposal.

Assembly Committee on Homeland Security and State Affairs vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 3 · Feb 16, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption recommended by committee on Homeland Security and State Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 61 to 33 · Feb 21, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 2 laid on table, Ayes 61, Noes 33”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 60 to 34 · Feb 21, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 3 laid on table, Ayes 60, Noes 34”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to adopt it

Passed, 69 to 25 · Feb 21, 2012 · 5 didn't vote

See how each of the 99 representatives voted

D: Democrat, I: Independent, R: Republican

Yes (69)

Didn't vote (5)

Official motion: “Read a third time and adopted, Ayes 69, Noes 25”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2012

    The session ended, and the proposal died with it.

  2. Feb 22, 2012

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.

  3. Feb 22, 2012

    The Senate received it.

  4. Feb 21, 2012

    The Assembly adopted it, 69 to 25.

  5. Feb 21, 2012

    The Assembly adopted it.

  6. Feb 16, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  7. Feb 16, 2012

    The committee voted to recommend adopting it, 5 to 3.

  8. Feb 8, 2012

    The committee held a public hearing.

  9. Feb 2, 2012

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  10. Feb 1, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Homeland Security and State Affairs.

  11. Feb 1, 2012

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 1, 2012 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Kooyenga, Marklein, Kapenga, Klenke, Strachota, Thiesfeldt, Krug, Craig, Honadel, Petersen, Litjens, Nygren, Steineke, Farrow, Kaufert, Rivard, Suder, Knilans, Mursau, Stroebel, Weininger, A. Ott, Jacque, Knudson, Brooks, Ziegelbauer, Kerkman, Van Roy, Spanbauer, Severson, Wynn, Williams, T. Larson, Knodl, Endsley, Loudenbeck and Molepske Jr;Cosponsored by Senators Zipperer, Lasee, Leibham, Lazich, Cowles, Schultz, Olsen and Grothman

  2. Feb 1, 2012 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Homeland Security and State Affairs

  3. Feb 2, 2012 · Assembly

    Representative LeMahieu added as a coauthor

  4. Feb 8, 2012 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Feb 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Report adoption recommended by committee on Homeland Security and State Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 3

  7. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  8. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 2-21-2012 by committee on Rules

  9. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  10. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Kooyenga

  11. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 adopted

  12. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representatives Bewley, Danou, Zamarripa, Jorgensen, Turner, Mason, Pope-Roberts, Hebl, Doyle, Ringhand and Billings

  13. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 laid on table, Ayes 61, Noes 33

  14. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 3 offered by Representatives Mason and Richards

  15. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 3 laid on table, Ayes 60, Noes 34

  16. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  17. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  18. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a third time and adopted, Ayes 69, Noes 25

  19. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  20. Feb 22, 2012 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  21. Feb 22, 2012 · Senate

    Read and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  22. Feb 22, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  23. Mar 23, 2012 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote