Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
temporary service by a court of appeals judge in the supreme court in judicial disciplinary proceedings (first consideration).
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Adopted, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Article VII, section 11, of the Wisconsin Constitution, provides that justices and
judges are subject to reprimand, censure, suspension, or removal for cause or for
disability by the supreme court pursuant to procedures established by the
legislature. Article VII, section 4 (3), of the Wisconsin Constitution, prohibits the
temporary appointment of a court of appeals judge or circuit court judge to the
supreme court.
This proposed constitutional amendment, proposed to the 2011 legislature on
first consideration, requires that the supreme court assign on a temporary basis a
court of appeals judge to aid in the proper disposition of judicial disciplinary
proceedings in the supreme court to provide an odd number of justices for the
consideration of the proceedings. The person assigned must be the most senior court
of appeals judge eligible to be assigned.
Under current statutory law, the judicial commission is charged with
investigating the alleged misconduct or permanent disability of a judge. If the
judicial commission finds probable cause that a judge is engaging or has engaged in
misconduct, it files a formal complaint with the supreme court. If the judicial
commission finds probable cause that a judge has a permanent disability, it files a
petition with the supreme court [s. 757.85, stats.].
After the judicial commission finds probable cause of misconduct or permanent
disability and before it files a complaint or petition, the matter is heard by a panel
consisting of either three court of appeals judges or two court of appeals judges and
one reserve judge or by a jury. The supreme court reviews the findings of fact,
conclusions of law, and recommendations submitted following the hearing and
determines appropriate discipline or action [ss. 757.87 and 757.91, stats.].
This amendment was prepared for the Joint Legislative Council's Special
Committee on Judicial Discipline and Recusal.
A constitutional amendment requires adoption by two successive legislatures,
and ratification by the people, before it becomes effective.
Sponsors
Full history
- Mar 8, 2012 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Hebl, Jorgensen, Roys, C. Taylor, Berceau, Turner, Pasch, Richards, Bewley, Pope-Roberts and Kessler;Cosponsored by Senators S. Coggs and C. Larson
- Mar 8, 2012 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary and Ethics
- Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly
Failed to adopt pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1