Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Assembly Joint Resolution 21

Creation of the fiscal responsibility fund (first consideration)

Topics: Appropriation, Constitutional amendments: First consideration

Passed the Assembly, then stopped

The Assembly passed it on May 11, 2011, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to ⁠. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new proposal.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Apr 1, 2011

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 57 to 37

  4. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.

  5. Adopted, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ⁠”

Read the proposal

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Currently, the state maintains the budget stabilization fund which is established and administered as required by statute. This proposed constitutional amendment, proposed to the 2011 legislature on first consideration, requires the legislature to establish the fiscal responsibility fund in the treasury, and to deposit into the fund the greater of 1) one-half of 1 percent of the actual general fund tax collections in the second preceding fiscal year; or 2) the amount, if any, by which the actual general fund tax collections in the second preceding fiscal year exceeded 6.5 percent of state personal income in the calendar year in which the second preceding fiscal year began. The 6.5 percent threshold may be modified by law by a two-thirds vote of the legislature. The amendment would permit the legislature to appropriate moneys from the fund by a two-thirds vote or by a majority vote if the governor declares that the national real gross domestic product is projected to decline in either the current or succeeding fiscal year. In each fiscal year following a fiscal year in which the balance in the fiscal responsibility fund exceeded 10 percent of actual general fund tax collections in that fiscal year, the legislature shall appropriate by law from the fiscal responsibility fund the excess to be used for property tax relief in the same manner as the net proceeds of the state lottery under article IV, section 24 (6) (a), of the constitution.

A proposed constitutional amendment requires adoption by two successive legislatures, and ratification by the people, before it can become effective.

Who's behind it

20 lawmakers are its ⁠. All 20 are Republicans.

1 more lawmaker ⁠.

See all 21 names

Authors (20)

Signed on in support (1)

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this proposal, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 9 votes on this proposal. Taking a bill up right away needs two-thirds of the members, a higher bar than passing it, so that vote can draw more yeses than the final one.

Assembly Committee on Ways and Means vote to recommend it

Passed, 6 to 5 · Apr 12, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption recommended by committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 6, Noes 5”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 57 to 38 · Apr 14, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 57, Noes 38”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 57 to 38 · Apr 14, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 2 laid on table, Ayes 57, Noes 38”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 57 to 38 · Apr 14, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 3 laid on table, Ayes 57, Noes 38”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 57 to 38 · Apr 14, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 4 laid on table, Ayes 57, Noes 38”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 57 to 38 · Apr 14, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 5 laid on table, Ayes 57, Noes 38”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 57 to 38 · Apr 14, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 6 laid on table, Ayes 57, Noes 38”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to take it up right away

Passed, 56 to 39 · Apr 14, 2011 · 1 didn't vote

See how each of the 96 representatives voted

D: Democrat, I: Independent, R: Republican

Yes (56)

No (39)

Didn't vote (1)

Official motion: “Refused to suspend rules to read a third time, Ayes 56, Noes 39”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to adopt it

Passed, 57 to 37 · May 11, 2011 · 1 didn't vote

See how each of the 95 representatives voted

D: Democrat, I: Independent, R: Republican

Yes (57)

No (37)

Didn't vote (1)

Official motion: “Read a third time and adopted, Ayes 57, Noes 37”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2012

    The session ended, and the proposal died with it.

  2. May 13, 2011

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations.

  3. May 12, 2011

    The Senate received it.

  4. May 11, 2011

    The Assembly adopted it, 57 to 37.

  5. Apr 12, 2011

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. Apr 12, 2011

    The committee voted to recommend adopting it, 6 to 5.

  7. Apr 7, 2011

    The committee held a public hearing.

  8. Apr 1, 2011

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Ways and Means.

  9. Apr 1, 2011

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Apr 1, 2011 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Tranel, Jacque, Ripp, Ballweg, Knilans, Brooks, Marklein, A. Ott, Rivard, Kestell, Spanbauer, Pridemore, Steineke, Bernier, Petryk, Honadel, Endsley, Tauchen, Kaufert, Mursau and Farrow;Cosponsored by Senator Schultz

  2. Apr 1, 2011 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Ways and Means

  3. Apr 7, 2011 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Apr 8, 2011 · Assembly

    Representative Farrow withdrawn as a coauthor

  5. Apr 12, 2011 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Apr 12, 2011 · Assembly

    Report adoption recommended by committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 6, Noes 5

  7. Apr 12, 2011 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  8. Apr 12, 2011 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 4-14-2011 by committee on Rules

  9. Apr 14, 2011 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  10. Apr 14, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Staskunas

  11. Apr 14, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 57, Noes 38

  12. Apr 14, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Staskunas

  13. Apr 14, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 laid on table, Ayes 57, Noes 38

  14. Apr 14, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 3 offered by Representative Staskunas

  15. Apr 14, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 3 laid on table, Ayes 57, Noes 38

  16. Apr 14, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 4 offered by Representative Staskunas

  17. Apr 14, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 4 laid on table, Ayes 57, Noes 38

  18. Apr 14, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 5 offered by Representative Staskunas

  19. Apr 14, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 5 laid on table, Ayes 57, Noes 38

  20. Apr 14, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 6 offered by Representative Staskunas

  21. Apr 14, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 6 laid on table, Ayes 57, Noes 38

  22. Apr 14, 2011 · Assembly

    Refused to refer to committee on Ways and Means

  23. Apr 14, 2011 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  24. Apr 14, 2011 · Assembly

    Refused to suspend rules to read a third time, Ayes 56, Noes 39

  25. May 10, 2011 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 10:03 A.M. on 5-11-2011 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 9

  26. May 11, 2011 · Assembly

    Read a third time and adopted, Ayes 57, Noes 37

  27. May 11, 2011 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  28. May 12, 2011 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  29. May 13, 2011 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations

  30. Mar 23, 2012 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote