Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Assembly Joint Resolution 26

Deleting from the constitution the offices of secretary of state and state treasurer (first consideration)

Topics: Constitutional amendments: First consideration, Public Lands, Board of Commissioners of, Secretary of State, Treasurer: State

Stopped before the full Assembly voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new proposal.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Apr 12, 2011

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Adopted, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Failed to adopt pursuant to ⁠”

Read the proposal

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This proposed constitutional amendment, proposed to the 2011 legislature on first consideration, deletes from the constitution the offices of secretary of state and state treasurer.

Secretary of state Currently, the constitution assigns four duties to the secretary of state; all other duties are prescribed by law. The four duties prescribed by the constitution are to:

Read the full summary

1) serve as governor when there is a vacancy in the office of lieutenant governor and the governor dies, resigns, or is removed from office, or serve as acting governor when there is a vacancy in the office of lieutenant governor and the governor is absent from the state, impeached, or incapable of performing the duties of office; 2) keep a fair record of the official acts of the legislature and executive department of the state; 3) serve as a member of the Board of Commissioners of Public Lands; and 4) keep the great seal of Wisconsin.

Under this proposal, the secretary of state is replaced by the attorney general in the line of gubernatorial succession. The proposal deletes the requirement that the secretary of state keep legislative and executive records. The proposal also removes the secretary of state as a member of the Board of Commissioners of Public Lands. Under the proposal, the constitution continues to provide for a great seal, but its placement is determined by law.

State treasurer Currently, the only duty assigned to the state treasurer by the constitution is to serve as a member of the Board of Commissioners of Public Lands; all other duties are prescribed by law. The proposal removes the state treasurer as a member of the Board of Commissioners of Public Lands.

Terms of incumbents Under the proposal, the last election for secretary of state or state treasurer required by the constitution is the one that was held in November 2010. The incumbents will continue to serve until the first Monday in January 2015.

Reconciling split ratification When a proposed constitutional amendment incorporates more than one object or purpose, the legislature must submit each unrelated object or purpose to the people for ratification by a separate ballot question. The constitution provides that, "if more than one amendment be submitted, they shall be submitted in such manner that the people may vote for or against such amendments separately" [see section 1 of article XII of the constitution].

The changes proposed in this joint resolution are structured to permit submission of the amendment for ratification by separate ballot questions relating to each of the offices to which the amendment relates.

Board of Commissioners of Public Lands The three-member Board of Commissioners of Public Lands presently consists of the secretary of state, the state treasurer, and the attorney general. Under this proposal: 1) the attorney general remains a member; 2) the lieutenant governor becomes a member; and 3) the state superintendent of public instruction becomes a member if the offices of secretary of state and state treasurer are both deleted from the constitution.

Second consideration and ratification A constitutional amendment requires adoption by two successive legislatures, and ratification by the people, before it can become effective.

Who's behind it

20 lawmakers are its ⁠. 19 are Republicans and 1 is a Democrat.

4 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 24 names

Authors (20)

Signed on in support (4)

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this proposal.

Assembly Committee on Judiciary and Ethics vote to recommend it

Passed, 6 to 2 · Oct 12, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption recommended by committee on Judiciary and Ethics, Ayes 6, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2012

    The session ended, and the proposal died with it.

  2. Jan 26, 2012

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  3. Oct 12, 2011

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  4. Oct 12, 2011

    The committee voted to recommend adopting it, 6 to 2.

  5. Aug 18, 2011

    The committee held a public hearing.

  6. Apr 12, 2011

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Judiciary and Ethics.

  7. Apr 12, 2011

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Apr 12, 2011 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Krug, Jacque, August, Bies, Brooks, Endsley, Honadel, Jorgensen, Kerkman, Kestell, Kooyenga, LeMahieu, Meyer, Mursau, Nygren, J. Ott, Petryk, Rivard, Steineke and Strachota;Cosponsored by Senators Leibham, Olsen and Wanggaard

  2. Apr 12, 2011 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary and Ethics

  3. Aug 18, 2011 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Sep 29, 2011 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  5. Oct 12, 2011 · Assembly

    Report adoption recommended by committee on Judiciary and Ethics, Ayes 6, Noes 2

  6. Oct 12, 2011 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  7. Jan 26, 2012 · Assembly

    Senator Carpenter added as a cosponsor

  8. Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly

    Failed to adopt pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote