Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
requiring the legislature to enact laws requiring reasonable notice of and public access to meetings of governmental bodies, including the legislature, and making members of the legislature subject to citations and civil penalties for violations of such laws (first consideration).
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Adopted, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
On June 14, 2011, in
Ozanne v. Fitzgerald
, the Wisconsin Supreme Court held
that under the constitutional separation of powers, the courts will not apply the
notice and public access requirements of the open meetings law to meetings of
legislative bodies.
The constitution also prohibits arrest of members of the legislature except for
treason, felony, or breach of the peace and exempts members from civil process
during the legislative session and for 15 days before and after the session.
This constitutional amendment, proposed to the 2011 legislature on first
consideration, requires the legislature to enact laws requiring reasonable notice of
and public access to meetings of governmental bodies, including the legislature, and
making members of the legislature subject to citations and civil penalties for
violations of such laws.
A constitutional amendment requires adoption by two successive legislatures,
and ratification by the people, before it can become effective.
Sponsors
Introduced by: Barca (D) , Berceau (D) , Bernard Schaber (D) , Bewley (D) , D. Cullen (D) , Doyle (D) , E. Coggs (D) , Fields (D) , Hebl (D) , Hintz (D) , Hulsey (D) , Mason (D) , Molepske Jr (D) , Pasch (D) , Pocan (D) , Radcliffe (D) , Richards (D) , Ringhand (D) , Roys (D) , Seidel (D) , Shilling (D) , Sinicki (D) , Staskunas (D) , Steinbrink (D) , Vruwink (D)
Votes
Suspending the rules (to take a vote immediately) needs a two-thirds majority — a higher bar than passing the bill, which needs a simple majority. That's why a suspension motion can show more Ayes than the passage vote that follows it. Glossary
Assembly: Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Assembly Organization and take up, Ayes 38, Noes 57
Failed 38–57 Feb 16, 2012 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Aug 9, 2011 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Richards, Barca, Berceau, Bernard Schaber, Bewley, E. Coggs, D. Cullen, Doyle, Fields, Hebl, Hintz, Hulsey, Mason, Molepske Jr, Pasch, Pocan, Radcliffe, Ringhand, Roys, Seidel, Shilling, Sinicki, Staskunas, Steinbrink and Vruwink;Cosponsored by Senators C. Larson, Holperin, Carpenter and S. Coggs
- Aug 9, 2011 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Homeland Security and State Affairs
- Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly
Withdrawn from committee on Homeland Security and State Affairs and referred to committee on Assembly Organization pursuant to Assembly Rule 42 (3)(c)
- Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly
Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Assembly Organization and take up, Ayes 38, Noes 57
- Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly
Failed to adopt pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1