Skip to content

Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session

AJR 52

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

requiring the legislature to enact laws requiring reasonable notice of and public access to meetings of governmental bodies, including the legislature, and making members of the legislature subject to citations and civil penalties for violations of such laws (first consideration).

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Adopted, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

On June 14, 2011, in

Ozanne v. Fitzgerald

, the Wisconsin Supreme Court held

that under the constitutional separation of powers, the courts will not apply the

notice and public access requirements of the open meetings law to meetings of

legislative bodies.

The constitution also prohibits arrest of members of the legislature except for

treason, felony, or breach of the peace and exempts members from civil process

during the legislative session and for 15 days before and after the session.

This constitutional amendment, proposed to the 2011 legislature on first

consideration, requires the legislature to enact laws requiring reasonable notice of

and public access to meetings of governmental bodies, including the legislature, and

making members of the legislature subject to citations and civil penalties for

violations of such laws.

A constitutional amendment requires adoption by two successive legislatures,

and ratification by the people, before it can become effective.

Sponsors

Introduced by: Barca (D) , Berceau (D) , Bernard Schaber (D) , Bewley (D) , D. Cullen (D) , Doyle (D) , E. Coggs (D) , Fields (D) , Hebl (D) , Hintz (D) , Hulsey (D) , Mason (D) , Molepske Jr (D) , Pasch (D) , Pocan (D) , Radcliffe (D) , Richards (D) , Ringhand (D) , Roys (D) , Seidel (D) , Shilling (D) , Sinicki (D) , Staskunas (D) , Steinbrink (D) , Vruwink (D)

4 cosponsors

C. Larson (D) , Carpenter (D) , Holperin (D) , S. Coggs (D)

Votes

Suspending the rules (to take a vote immediately) needs a two-thirds majority — a higher bar than passing the bill, which needs a simple majority. That's why a suspension motion can show more Ayes than the passage vote that follows it. Glossary

Assembly: Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Assembly Organization and take up, Ayes 38, Noes 57

Failed 38–57 Feb 16, 2012 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Aug 9, 2011 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Richards, Barca, Berceau, Bernard Schaber, Bewley, E. Coggs, D. Cullen, Doyle, Fields, Hebl, Hintz, Hulsey, Mason, Molepske Jr, Pasch, Pocan, Radcliffe, Ringhand, Roys, Seidel, Shilling, Sinicki, Staskunas, Steinbrink and Vruwink;Cosponsored by Senators C. Larson, Holperin, Carpenter and S. Coggs

  2. Aug 9, 2011 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Homeland Security and State Affairs

  3. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Withdrawn from committee on Homeland Security and State Affairs and referred to committee on Assembly Organization pursuant to Assembly Rule 42 (3)(c)

  4. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Assembly Organization and take up, Ayes 38, Noes 57

  5. Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly

    Failed to adopt pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1