Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Assembly Joint Resolution 63

Recall of elective officers and a code of ethics for government officials (first consideration)

Topics: Constitutional amendments: First consideration, County: Officers, Ethics, Judge, Legislature, Legislature: Member, Public officers, Recall, Supreme Court, United States: Congress

Passed the Assembly, then stopped

The Assembly passed it on Mar 6, 2012, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to ⁠. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new proposal.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Oct 12, 2011

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 60 to 37

  4. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.

  5. Adopted, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ⁠”

Read the proposal

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This constitutional amendment, proposed to the 2011 legislature on first consideration, limits the grounds for the recall of an incumbent congressional, judicial, or legislative elective officer or any county elective officer specified in the Wisconsin Constitution (elective officer). Currently, a petition for recall may be filed with the officer who receives the nomination petition to the elective office in the primary (filing officer), and need not demonstrate any grounds for the recall of an elective officer. Under this amendment, an elective officer may be recalled only if he or she has been charged with a serious crime or if a finding of probable cause has been made that he or she violated the state code of ethics.

The amendment further requires the filing officer to determine, before a recall election is scheduled, that the petition for recall demonstrates sufficient grounds for recalling the elective officer.

Read the full summary

The amendment also requires the legislature to establish a code of ethics for government officials and a board to administer the code.

A proposed constitutional amendment requires adoption by two successive legislatures, and ratification by the people, before it becomes effective.

Who's behind it

22 lawmakers are its ⁠. All 22 are Republicans.

4 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 26 names

Authors (22)

Signed on in support (4)

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this proposal, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 3 votes on this proposal.

Assembly Committee on Election and Campaign Reform vote to recommend it

Passed, 4 to 2 · Mar 2, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption recommended by committee on Election and Campaign Reform, Ayes 4, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 60 to 37 · Mar 6, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 60, Noes 37”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to adopt it

Passed, 60 to 37 · Mar 6, 2012 · 2 didn't vote

See how each of the 99 representatives voted

D: Democrat, I: Independent, R: Republican

Yes (60)

No (37)

Didn't vote (2)

Official motion: “Read a third time and adopted, Ayes 60, Noes 37”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2012

    The session ended, and the proposal died with it.

  2. Mar 7, 2012

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations.

  3. Mar 7, 2012

    The Senate received it.

  4. Mar 6, 2012

    The Assembly adopted it, 60 to 37.

  5. Mar 2, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. Mar 2, 2012

    The committee voted to recommend adopting it, 4 to 2.

  7. Feb 9, 2012

    The committee held a public hearing.

  8. Oct 14, 2011 to Dec 14, 2011

    2 more representatives signed on in support.

  9. Oct 12, 2011

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Election and Campaign Reform.

  10. Oct 12, 2011

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Oct 12, 2011 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Vos, Farrow, Tauchen, Kleefisch, Craig, Knudson, Van Roy, Nygren, A. Ott, Rivard, Severson, Kaufert, Honadel, Kapenga, Litjens, Kuglitsch, Petersen, Kestell, Stroebel, Strachota, Meyer and Ballweg;Cosponsored by Senators Harsdorf and Holperin

  2. Oct 12, 2011 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Election and Campaign Reform

  3. Oct 14, 2011 · Assembly

    Representative Jacque added as a coauthor

  4. Dec 14, 2011 · Assembly

    Representative Thiesfeldt added as a coauthor

  5. Feb 9, 2012 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  6. Feb 28, 2012 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  7. Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly

    Report adoption recommended by committee on Election and Campaign Reform, Ayes 4, Noes 2

  8. Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  9. Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 3-6-2012 by committee on Rules

  10. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  11. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representatives Pasch, Barca, Pocan, Hebl, Bernard Schaber and Bewley

  12. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 60, Noes 37

  13. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  14. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  15. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a third time and adopted, Ayes 60, Noes 37

  16. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  17. Mar 7, 2012 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  18. Mar 7, 2012 · Senate

    Read and referred to committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations

  19. Mar 23, 2012 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote