Skip to content

Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session

SB 114

Became law Official bill text Atom feed

legislative consideration of a biennial budget bill.

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Senate, completed
  3. Passes Assembly, completed
  4. Governor signs, completed
  5. Law, completed

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill makes the following changes relating to consideration of biennial

budget bills:

Earmark transparency report

The bill requires the Legislative Fiscal Bureau (LFB) to prepare an earmark

transparency report on each biennial budget bill and on each amendment thereto.

The report must contain all of the following: a list of all earmarks; the cost of each

earmark; and the beneficiary of each earmark. If the beneficiary is an individual,

LFB must identify the assembly and senate district in which the beneficiary resides.

If the beneficiary is an entity, LFB must identify the assembly and senate district in

which the beneficiary is located, incorporated, or organized. With respect to an

amendment to a biennial budget bill, LFB must identify the representative to the

assembly or senator who proposed the earmark.

Joint Committee on Finance consideration of biennial budget bill

The bill provides that the Joint Committee on Finance may not vote to

recommend passage of a biennial budget bill or an amendment thereto until LFB has

distributed a copy of the earmark transparency report to each member of the

legislature and has made the report available on the legislature's Internet Web site.

Senate and assembly consideration of biennial budget bill

The bill provides that neither house of the legislature may pass a biennial

budget bill until LFB has distributed a copy of the earmark transparency report on

the biennial budget bill, as amended, to each member of the legislature and has made

the report available on the legislature's Internet Web site. The bill further provides

that, if a committee of conference is convened on a biennial budget bill, a conference

report may not contain any earmark that was not included in the executive budget

bill or an amendment thereto that was passed by either house of the legislature but

may reduce any earmark that was so included.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Carpenter (D) , Galloway (R) , Kapanke (R) , Leibham (R) , Vukmir (R) , Zipperer (R)

18 cosponsors

Bernier (R) , Endsley (R) , Farrow (R) , J. Ott (R) , Jacque (R) , Kapenga (R) , Kestell (R) , Kooyenga (R) , Kramer (R) , LeMahieu (R) , Petersen (R) , Petryk (R) , Rivard (R) , Spanbauer (R) , Steineke (R) , Strachota (R) , Thiesfeldt (R) , Wynn (R)

Votes

Senate: Report passage recommended by committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations, Ayes 4, Noes 1

Passed 4–1 Feb 2, 2012 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Mar 5, 2012 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 89, Noes 4

Passed 89–4 Mar 15, 2012 official source full page

Aye · 89

Full history

  1. May 31, 2011 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Zipperer, Leibham, Vukmir, Carpenter, Galloway and Kapanke;Cosponsored by Representatives Kramer, Bernier, Endsley, Farrow, Jacque, Kapenga, Kestell, Kooyenga, LeMahieu, J. Ott, Petersen, Petryk, Rivard, Spanbauer, Steineke, Strachota, Thiesfeldt and Wynn

  2. May 31, 2011 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations

  3. Jun 9, 2011 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Dec 20, 2011 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Feb 1, 2012 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. Feb 2, 2012 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations, Ayes 4, Noes 1

  7. Feb 2, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  8. Mar 5, 2012 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  9. Mar 5, 2012 · Senate

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  10. Mar 5, 2012 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-6-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  11. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Read a second time

  12. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  13. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  14. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 30, Noes 3

  15. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  16. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  17. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  18. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:48 A.M. on 3-13-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22

  19. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  20. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  21. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  22. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 89, Noes 4

  23. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  24. Mar 16, 2012 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  25. Mar 26, 2012 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-26-2012

  26. Apr 5, 2012 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 4-5-2012

  27. Apr 6, 2012 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-6-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 220

  28. Apr 10, 2012 · Senate

    Published 4-19-2012