Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Senate Bill 114

Legislative consideration of a biennial budget bill

Topics: Budget bills and process, Data processing, Legislative Fiscal Bureau, Legislature: Finance, Joint Committee on, Legislature: Procedure

Became law

The governor signed it on Apr 6, 2012. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    May 31, 2011

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed 30 to 3

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 89 to 4

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2011 Wisconsin Act 220

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 10, 2012: “Published 4-19-2012”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill makes the following changes relating to consideration of biennial budget bills:

Earmark transparency report The bill requires the Legislative Fiscal Bureau (LFB) to prepare an earmark transparency report on each biennial budget bill and on each amendment thereto.

Read the full summary

The report must contain all of the following: a list of all earmarks; the cost of each earmark; and the beneficiary of each earmark. If the beneficiary is an individual, LFB must identify the assembly and senate district in which the beneficiary resides.

If the beneficiary is an entity, LFB must identify the assembly and senate district in which the beneficiary is located, incorporated, or organized. With respect to an amendment to a biennial budget bill, LFB must identify the representative to the assembly or senator who proposed the earmark.

Joint Committee on Finance consideration of biennial budget bill The bill provides that the Joint Committee on Finance may not vote to recommend passage of a biennial budget bill or an amendment thereto until LFB has distributed a copy of the earmark transparency report to each member of the legislature and has made the report available on the legislature's Internet Web site.

Senate and assembly consideration of biennial budget bill The bill provides that neither house of the legislature may pass a biennial budget bill until LFB has distributed a copy of the earmark transparency report on the biennial budget bill, as amended, to each member of the legislature and has made the report available on the legislature's Internet Web site. The bill further provides that, if a committee of conference is convened on a biennial budget bill, a conference report may not contain any earmark that was not included in the executive budget bill or an amendment thereto that was passed by either house of the legislature but may reduce any earmark that was so included.

Who's behind it

6 senators are its ⁠. 5 are Republicans and 1 is a Democrat.

18 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 24 names

Authors (6)

Signed on in support (18)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There were 4 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Judiciary vote to recommend it

Passed, 4 to 1 · Feb 2, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations, Ayes 4, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Mar 5, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 30 to 3 · Mar 6, 2012

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 30, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 89 to 4 · Mar 15, 2012 · 6 didn't vote

See how each of the 99 representatives voted

D: Democrat, I: Independent, R: Republican

Yes (89)

Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 89, Noes 4”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 10, 2012

    The new law was published.

  2. Apr 6, 2012

    The governor signed it. It became 2011 Wisconsin Act 220.

  3. Apr 5, 2012

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Mar 15, 2012

    The Assembly passed it too, 89 to 4.

  5. Mar 6, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. Mar 6, 2012

    The Assembly received it.

  7. Mar 6, 2012

    The Senate passed it, 30 to 3.

  8. Mar 5, 2012

    “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  9. Mar 5, 2012

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  10. Feb 2, 2012

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 4 to 1.

  11. Dec 20, 2011

    The committee held a public hearing.

  12. Jun 9, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  13. May 31, 2011

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations.

  14. May 31, 2011

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. May 31, 2011 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Zipperer, Leibham, Vukmir, Carpenter, Galloway and Kapanke;Cosponsored by Representatives Kramer, Bernier, Endsley, Farrow, Jacque, Kapenga, Kestell, Kooyenga, LeMahieu, J. Ott, Petersen, Petryk, Rivard, Spanbauer, Steineke, Strachota, Thiesfeldt and Wynn

  2. May 31, 2011 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations

  3. Jun 9, 2011 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Dec 20, 2011 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Feb 1, 2012 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. Feb 2, 2012 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations, Ayes 4, Noes 1

  7. Feb 2, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  8. Mar 5, 2012 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  9. Mar 5, 2012 · Senate

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  10. Mar 5, 2012 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-6-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  11. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Read a second time

  12. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  13. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  14. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 30, Noes 3

  15. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  16. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  17. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  18. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:48 A.M. on 3-13-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22

  19. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  20. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  21. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  22. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 89, Noes 4

  23. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  24. Mar 16, 2012 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  25. Mar 26, 2012 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-26-2012

  26. Apr 5, 2012 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 4-5-2012

  27. Apr 6, 2012 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-6-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 220

  28. Apr 10, 2012 · Senate

    Published 4-19-2012

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote